Beretta 300, 390, 391, 3901, 400???

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have an A400 "smurf gun". One of these days, I'll shoot it but I like shooting my over/unders so much.:)
 
My favorite is the 391 sporting guns. The 391 guns have chrome lined barrels and are easy o clean with a spray like G-96 that dissolves plastic cup scrapes, and a bore snake. Just use a can of starter fluid, outside, to spray off the gas cylinder, carbon just runs off. I own three 391 sporting guns, with Angle Portbolt handles and easy bolt release parts.
 
I think that the 390 was perfect and there was no need for Beretta to develop past that. But I guess the shooting public needs the latest and greatest.

The Gold Mallard 390 was the pinnacle of the platform.
 

Attachments

  • gold_mallard3s.jpg
    gold_mallard3s.jpg
    140.5 KB · Views: 11
For about 10 years I have coached in a kids' program. We have used several makes/models of shotguns, but the Berettas have always been the most reliable and easiest to clean. Now down to just Berettas -- either 391's or A400's in 20-ga. I personally own a 20-ga. A400 and a 12-ga. A400. The 12 is a great gun but since I no longer shoot competitively the 20 is what gets taken to the range most often these days.

The A400's will go longer without cleaning than the 391's, shooting the same shells. All of the 300-series were great guns, but they did make slight improvements with each model change.
 
The 390 is my favorite gas shotgun. I’ve had Browning Gold and Maxus and other Beretta models but always go back to the 390. The 3901 is the same shotgun with an American made barrel and comes with different trim levels. Every 390 I have seen were sold originally at WalMart and have a chrome lined barrel made in Turkey by Stoeger. The receivers are made by Beretta. I had a 3901 Statesman and a 390 - they feel the same and function the same. The 3901 Statesman had fancy wood and a bird dog engraved on the receiver. They are reliable work horses. I wish I would have bought a couple more when Walmart had them. I don’t think any of the newer models are an improvement, but rather just an answer to the other manufacturers race to make lighter shotguns. I prefer the weight of the 390/3901.
 
I'm going off memory here, and it ain't what it used to be, but...

The AL 300 & 301 were similar to the AL1, AL2 & AL3 series guns from the 70s. The gas system was a more picky on what type of shell was used. Some guns operated best with used to be called "High Brass" or full power loads.

The AL302 & 303 had an improved self-compensating gas system to improve cycling a wider range of shells.

The AL390 guns have a further improved the gas system and have a reputation for handling a wide range of shells from soft target loads to full power 3" shells extremely reliably. Early guns have the humpback receiver and later ones have a rounded receiver. There are fans of both types. Both are equally reliable. Available in both wood and plastic furniture.

As mentioned, the AL3901 was a US made version of the AL390 targeting lower cost outlets like Walmart. Plastic furniture instead of wood. I think there is a matt finish on metal. I think the magazine release button was also eliminated but I could be wrong.

The AL391 was Beretta's answer to complaints from some shooters that the AL390's forearm grip was too big or bulky. The gas system was redesigned to fit into a sleeker forearm. Some people prefer it and some prefer the 390 forearm. I think they also introduced 3.5" versions of the 391.

The AL400 is Beretta's current version of a gas operated semi-auto shotgun. I'm not sure what the changes are because I already have an AL390 and an AL391 and I can find no reason to get rid of them for a newer model. If the 400 series is as good as my 390 and 391, it should be a very good gun.


On a related note, Beretta also sold some inertia recoil field guns in the '80s and '90s. The model 1200 and 1201 were pretty much the same as Benelli Black Eagles and Montefeltros. With plastic stocks they were very light weight and great for field carry. Reliable too. They did kick pretty hard since the inertia system did not absorb any recoil and the light weight, so they could be punishing on the target range.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top