Beretta 3901

Status
Not open for further replies.

Balrog

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
3,211
Does anyone have on of these? I am thinking of getting the 3901 Target RL because I am looking for shotgun with a short length of pull. How are these guns finished? I can't tell from the beretta website if the gun is blued or matte?

Does anyone have photos?


How does it shoot?
 
I don't have one, but a friend of mine bought one a month or so ago. Very nice wood, satin finished. Metal sort of plain, matte black. Good looking gun, I don't think she's shot it yet.
 
What makes them so nice?
I think I want one, but in what way is it better than a Remington 1100?

Also, how do they compare to the 391 Urika 2?
 
Ok, the Remington 1100 was introduced in 1963. It quickly came to dominate the clay sports where folks used semi autos. However, when the Beretta 390 came out the 1100 just as quickly became displaced.

The old A390ST that I have is a treasure. It fits me well, and can be tuned to fit most folks of reasonable proportions. It is so absolutely reliable that it has pretty much ruined me for anything else. It is also very easy to break down and clean. The wood on it was just too pretty to beat up in the field, so I traded a Remington 11-87 in on one of the "Wal Mart" guns. I bought it at Bass Pro though. It has been immersed in black gumbo mud, whacked against trees, dinged, banged, etc. But it has never failed me. At $549.00, give or take, it is one of the best values in an auto loading shotgun available today.

There is a great deal of discussion about the difference between the 390 / 3901 and the 391 series. Some folks think that the 391 is a great improvement... I personally don't. They added some complex stuff that really did not improve anything and made the gun a lot more trouble to break down and clean.

Here is a very good discussion of the whole thing:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/beretta_300series_mystery.htm

Now, everybody pays their money and takes their choice. Some would rather eat worms than give up their 1100's. That's ok, but for me I find the 390 / 3901 to be far more reliable. The 1100 design is nearly 50 years old. In its day it was about as good as it got. I personally don't think so anymore.
 
When it comes to using a semiauto for serious clays, I think by far the top choice is a Beretta. Either a 391, 390, or 3901. And they really don't cost any more than lesser brands. You can buy the 390 version with plastic stock sold at chain stores for $550.
 
IMO, both the Rem. 1100 or the Ber. 3901 shoot well; the differences in the shooting experience will depend on personal fit and preferences. However, the 3901 one can make some adjustments.

if you do a search there will be plenty of opinions. :D
 
My 390 Sport has one failure to cycle in many, many thousands of rounds and that one was the first shot after a complete takedown and thorough inside/out cleaning. I field stripped it and reassembled and everything has been perfectly flawless since. Never figured out the reason for the malfxn either.
 
I have a Beretta 391 Urika 2 and would highly recommend it. I have put well over 2500 rounds through it and it works great. Also, it has a great recoil system. 12 gauge 391 Urika 2 kicks less than my Charles Daly 20 gauge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top