My 2 cent Beretta Pico Review, to offer a different opinion.
Pros:
I am very pleased with the overall build quality.
Mine has been reliable.
Very easy to conceal.
While some may criticize the flush fit mag release, I am completely satisfied with it. For my use, I enjoy the fact that it is purpose built for concealment and think that is a desirable trade off.
Also the paddle release, I wouldn’t prefer that in a full size gun, but for a tiny little gun like this it works really well! I don’t actually manipulate a standard button release on tiny guns any faster. It’s always going to be a 2 handed scenario for me. The plus is that this style on a tiny little gun lends itself to gross motor skills under stress and also wards against accidently magazine drops that can happen with some pocket pistols.
I don’t mind the bore axis. Actually that tall slide is easy to grip now that they improved the traction.
In the realm of double action pistols with second strike capability, the trigger is decent. I’m satisfied with that.
Cons:
The flush fit magazine is a 1 finger affair, and for me it is not controllable at all. The extended baseplate for me points low and feels unnatural. There are no other aftermarket magazines that I can find. I’d love an +1 or +2 extended magazine. I couldn’t find any other baseplates either.
I think overall beretta does not take advantage of the modular design of the gun. The lasers are and stuff are fine, but there should be more grip frames available for different styles of carry. I don’t think that would be hard or expensive to do. For instance I would appreciate some grips that allow for a better purchase of the gun, maybe those that want a two finger or three finger grip like the ct380. That would really add a lot of value to me for having a modular gun, to be able to change its size seasonally.
They are never going to make a .32acp version. They talked the talk at release but never mentioned it again.
I find dry fire to be a valuable part of practice. I know to use snapcaps but I see no reason why they couldn’t design or upgrade the gun with a more durable firing pin like every other modern gun in existence. I respect durability and this reminds me of the problem they have with another of their pocket pistols, the tomcat, which has a weak point in the frame that can crack (some dont care but its a dealbreaker for me). If you look into the problem with the tomcat, you will see there is no reason they could not just make that weak point in the frame a little tougher, and after all these years they don’t care and that disturbs me because there’s a lot I liked about that gun.
As far as the flush fit magazine. I started off shooting without one, but later found out that I can control the gun better with the extended grip.But more importantly, I found out that It makes it great for quick drawing of the gun in any position. The fingers naturally pull the gun up and quick.
Yes, it would seem that Beretta would do better with the great design of being modular. I like the ability to change grips, make the gun very easy to work on or minor repairs or replacement, through cleaning and lubrication etc. I am totally happy with the size of the grip, but I would see Beretta befitting for folks that like a larger grip.I personally do not believe in lasers, but appreciate folks that desire them.
I personally am not interested in a 32.cal version. Why? Because the gun already shoots so very mild. I just recenlty bought a Keltec P32. I was so impressed with the weight of only 6.6 oz. NO, it is not the quality of the Beretta, but it is a very capable little gun, crude in compariso, but a tool that works. Especially with the New Underwood Defender. Now if Beretta decides to make a 32.cal that weighs the same as the Keltec, I am a buyer.
I have absoultely no Problem with the fact that I have to use snapcaps. I do this with ALL my guns, no matter what the manuals have to say. Cheap insurance. And one thing for certain, there has never been a issue with broken striker pins. They are plenty sturdy as I have thousands of rounds through two gun and no issues. In fact, when I read about a few problems on the internet with them breaking, I ordered spares just in case and have yet to use them.
I certainly would not compare to the Tom cat with the crack frame issues. The cracked frames is the gun and not a part and is unacceptable, especially considering how much money they cost.
Love the Pico trigger. One thing about them is the fact that they will wear in to be very nice and smooth. Just a very natural smooth pull at this stage.
One thing about the Pico, mine have proven themselves to be some of the most reliable guns I have. And I love shooting them. I know I will end up with a third soon, just because.
That said, I have alway's believed that there is not a perfect fit for every shooter. And I would not recommend one to a newbie or someone that does not want to put the effort and time into training. My Kahr is a very nice well built gun, and I have heard many nice reports from the Rem380 from folks that I trust that are into pocket guns.