henschman
Member
I have a lot of experience with various .22 mag-fed semi autos, being an Appleseed Shoot Boss, and having owned and shot quite a few myself. My vote would be for the 10/22. Preferably an older one. The older the better. The new ones are as reliable as ever, but the finish isn't very good quality (at least on the base model carbines) and the trigger pull is terrible. They have some upper scale models like the Deluxe and International that have better finish and come with rubber butt pads, sling swivels, etc., but the new factory triggers are universally atrocious.
My Dad bought a Marlin 795, and while it was cheaper than the Ruger, it took a lot of work to make it work as well. It had a bad stovepiping problem until I polished the feed ramp and inside of the receiver. From the many reports of similar feeding issues I have read, I am not the only one to experience this problem. Also the Ruger comes with a picatinny mount from the factory, while the Marlin just has a dovetail mount. We kept having trouble with scope rings sliding rearward on the Marlin after prolonged range sessions, so we had to shell out the bucks for a picatinny mount. Plus, there is just no mistaking that you are shooting a .22 when you are shooting the Marlin. It comes with a narrow, flimsy plastic stock, as compared to the more substantial wood stock that is standard on the Ruger. Another annoying feature about the Marlin is that it has a mag disconnect. This makes it hard to dry fire, which is something that is very important to building good fundamentals.
The Ruger may have a terrible factory trigger pull, but that is easily remedied by an inexpensive target sear from Volquartsen. At least they generally run reliably out of the box. As for accuracy, the base carbines are typically are capable of 2 MOA or so in factory configuration. If this isn't good enough for you, it can be improved by the many aftermarket barrels, stocks, trigger groups, and other parts that are made for the Ruger.
My Dad bought a Marlin 795, and while it was cheaper than the Ruger, it took a lot of work to make it work as well. It had a bad stovepiping problem until I polished the feed ramp and inside of the receiver. From the many reports of similar feeding issues I have read, I am not the only one to experience this problem. Also the Ruger comes with a picatinny mount from the factory, while the Marlin just has a dovetail mount. We kept having trouble with scope rings sliding rearward on the Marlin after prolonged range sessions, so we had to shell out the bucks for a picatinny mount. Plus, there is just no mistaking that you are shooting a .22 when you are shooting the Marlin. It comes with a narrow, flimsy plastic stock, as compared to the more substantial wood stock that is standard on the Ruger. Another annoying feature about the Marlin is that it has a mag disconnect. This makes it hard to dry fire, which is something that is very important to building good fundamentals.
The Ruger may have a terrible factory trigger pull, but that is easily remedied by an inexpensive target sear from Volquartsen. At least they generally run reliably out of the box. As for accuracy, the base carbines are typically are capable of 2 MOA or so in factory configuration. If this isn't good enough for you, it can be improved by the many aftermarket barrels, stocks, trigger groups, and other parts that are made for the Ruger.