Anna's Dad
Member
For years I've preferred buying guns from private individuals. Not only is it simpler (no paperwork except maybe a bill of sale), cheaper (no transfer fees or taxes and no shipping fees when done locally) but I always felt like it was done without the eyes of Big Brother watching. I have to say the latter was one of the most attractive aspects of the face-to-face purchase.
Now I'm wondering if that concern was justified at all. I recently read an article which indicated that the Brady Campaign was trying to have NICS records retained indefinitely. I had just assumed this was always the case!
I looked into a little further and it sounds like records are maintained for 60 days. Not very long at all really.
Combine this with the fact that law enforcement isn't allowed to maintain records of firearms purchases (at least in my state) and it seems like an "on the record" purchase isn't really visible to the government at all.
One thing I'm not sure about is how long dealers are required to maintain records of firearms purchases. I'm guessing this probably varies from state-to-state as well, but there are probably federal requirements as well. If anyone has info on this, I'd appreciate it.
Of course then I got to thinking that many dealers, particularly larger ones, probably maintain computerized records of purchases well beyond federal or state requirements for marketing reasons. Just the existence of these records would allow the government access to that information should laws change in the future (which certainly seems possible given current makeup of the legislative, executive and to some extent, even the judicial branches).
What do you all think about this? Appreciate any opinions but please disclose whether or not you're wearing a tinfoil hat while replying!
Regards...
Now I'm wondering if that concern was justified at all. I recently read an article which indicated that the Brady Campaign was trying to have NICS records retained indefinitely. I had just assumed this was always the case!
I looked into a little further and it sounds like records are maintained for 60 days. Not very long at all really.
Combine this with the fact that law enforcement isn't allowed to maintain records of firearms purchases (at least in my state) and it seems like an "on the record" purchase isn't really visible to the government at all.
One thing I'm not sure about is how long dealers are required to maintain records of firearms purchases. I'm guessing this probably varies from state-to-state as well, but there are probably federal requirements as well. If anyone has info on this, I'd appreciate it.
Of course then I got to thinking that many dealers, particularly larger ones, probably maintain computerized records of purchases well beyond federal or state requirements for marketing reasons. Just the existence of these records would allow the government access to that information should laws change in the future (which certainly seems possible given current makeup of the legislative, executive and to some extent, even the judicial branches).
What do you all think about this? Appreciate any opinions but please disclose whether or not you're wearing a tinfoil hat while replying!
Regards...