Wait,
CA AG is asking the same judge who just destroyed their best argument with an 86 page order and judgement now to stay his own order for the same reasons why he ruled unconstitutional?
Really? Wow ... They must be desperate
... or crazy.
I am not seeing judge Benitez granting a stay.
http://michellawyers.com/duncan-v-becerra/
"To effectively preserve the status quo, and to prevent a sudden influx of large capacity magazines (LCMs) into the State of California (the “State”), Defendant respectfully requests that the Court issue an immediate, temporary stay pending its ruling on the application for a stay pending appeal.
Even if this Court, or the Ninth Circuit, ultimately issues a stay pending appeal, the State will suffer irreparable injury if LCMs are permitted to flow into the State in the interim. Defendant respectfully requests that such a temporary stay be issued by no later than April 2, 2019."
Oooops, too late as vendors started shipping "arms"/magazines and people have made out-of-state purchases.
"... the State will suffer irreparable injury if LCMs are permitted to flow into the State in the interim"
I could just hear judge Benitez asking, "How?" as significant number of LCMs ALREADY existed in the state for decades.