This may be another garbage response, but I submit that if as much development time and money was spent on getting the Glock competitive as a Bullseye gun, it would hang in there with the Colt Browning 45 ACP.
The service pistols converted by the federal armories were to outward appearances a standard 1911A1 while inside were tricked out in the same way as a stock car compares to your family sedan. There has been no similar concerted effort to trick out a Glock, but give it 40 or so years and you might have some decent aftermarket parts possibilities. The 1911A1 has about sixty years head start on Gaston's baby.
Also, the trigger would not be a problem to a good shooter. They can work around some big difficulties. The 1911A1 trigger makes it easier to fire high scores, maybe, but a Glock trigger is by no means as bad as some people make it out to be. YMMV JMTC Etc.
The service pistols converted by the federal armories were to outward appearances a standard 1911A1 while inside were tricked out in the same way as a stock car compares to your family sedan. There has been no similar concerted effort to trick out a Glock, but give it 40 or so years and you might have some decent aftermarket parts possibilities. The 1911A1 has about sixty years head start on Gaston's baby.
Also, the trigger would not be a problem to a good shooter. They can work around some big difficulties. The 1911A1 trigger makes it easier to fire high scores, maybe, but a Glock trigger is by no means as bad as some people make it out to be. YMMV JMTC Etc.