Carry Gun: Thinking About Rethinking

I think the OP is an example of apples and oranges. First off the OP's pistol doesn't have the capability of the other gun. I have no ideal of the shooter's skill levels but that could have also been a factor. Just the sight differences would have been a big part of it for me. Even though I am capable of using iron sights with no glasses again I am still better with a red dot although far from being a good competitor at my age.

Second thing is that self defense is usually a close up situation and about anything made today should be capable of hitting center mass if the user is capable of doing so. I can understand where a commander sized 1911 in 45 might be just a little much for a 13 year old too. The 1911 is available in 9mm and in my limited experience they are less intimidating to a younger shooter. An example is when my oldest gg daughter was 13 I asked her if she wanted to shoot my fill sized 1911 9mm. No pressure, her choice. Sure and she liked it. I asked if she wanted to try the 45 version. Sure, but 2 shots and she gave it back saying it was a little too much for her. Grandpa is equally accurate with either but I am faster with the 9mm just because of the difference in recoil.

A commander sized 1911 in 9mm might fill the OP's bill.
 
How many times can you hit it in one second--the time it would likely take for an attacker to close from seven yards to two yards?

...or more realistically, in half that time, since starting firing at seven yards might well not happen?
IMHO, the secret is to make the first one count. Hunting is a prime example of this. Take a newbie out pheasant hunting behind a good pointer. Even knowing where the bird is and already being poised for the shot, they generally miss the first shot, because they forget to aim, or in their excitement, they take the first shot without having the gun properly shouldered. Many times they hit on the second, because they take their time and aim. After the first point, their shooting gets better, because they remember to aim. They remember to look at the sights. Make the first one count and many times you do not need to follow it up. If you are on target with the first shot, odds are if the target is getting closer, you will still be on it.

Everyone here is a critic. You want to know even if I can make a good hit @ 7 yards, how many times more can I hit the attacker as he moves in on me? @ 2 yards, I doubt if there is anyone here who would miss, if they are still able to shoot. Someone will ask next, "but what if the attacker is 25 yards out?" or, "can you do it left handed because you've been shot in your right arm?", etc, etc. What folks need to do is to strive to do their best in any scenario. That means to practice. Not only to find the best accuracy with a particular firearm and ammo, but to familiarize oneself to the point they don't have to remember, they just need to react. Not only is everyone here a critic, they are also an expert. They tend to know which gun is better than yours, as well as what ammo is better. They know their holster is better and how they practice is better. I see it also at the Sporting Clays course I shoot. Guys with stick on dots on their glasses and a case of 5 different chokes that still struggle to shoot as well as the ol' fart with his Pheasant SxS. Comes down to shooting the best with what you have. Comes down to shooting what you feel most comfortable with, have the most confidence in, and are the most proficient with.

Seems to me, the OP has lost his confidence with his EDC. Either he needs a different gun or he needs to regain his confidence in what he has somehow. Either or both can be a simple solution.
 
HO, the secret is to make the first one count.
How could one ever ensure that when the things that one must hit to "count" are small, moving irregularly and rapidly in six axes, and completely hidden?

Hitting any of them is a matter of luck. The likelihood of effecting a stop increases markedly when more rounds strike the attacker..
 
Seems to me, the OP has lost his confidence with his EDC. Either he needs a different gun or he needs to regain his confidence in what he has somehow. Either or both can be a simple solution
Kinda of the gist of it. Well and whether or not it's even worth considering if this is right:
I think the OP is an example of apples and oranges
It was mostly just a dumb idea to shoot it against a solid shooter in a competition setting with not equal equipment.
 
Its a simple solution "if" youre willing to make it simple, but simple and easy are two totally different things too.

It seems people have a lot of ideas as to what is what when it comes to guns and carrying them. Shooting them is just a whole other level.

My basis for what I carry has always been, find the realistic gun you shoot the best with, across the board and with some reality, and make that your carry gun. Thats always been the full/duty sized guns for me. Easiest to shoot well with and still easily carried concealed on a daily basis.

Contrary to what you often hear, carrying a full sized handgun is not a big deal, or hard to do, and in the normal clothes you usually wear. You just have to make some appropriate changes and figure it out. Its a lifestyle too, and not just a random thought sort of thing. You need to make the appropriate changes and "live" them to the point of it being natural. Doesnt take long, and once you're there, you wont give it a thought.

When it comes to the shooting part, Im really amazed at some of the replies sometimes, and what people seem to base their skills on, or what they think their skills are. I guarantee you, that we ALL overestimate our skills and abilities. Thats just human nature and a fact. No doubt, some are better than others, and those that are, are generally regularly putting in the necessary time and effort to try and get there. And you never "get there". ;)

"Hunting" is great and all, but shooting something that likely doesn't know its getting shot, and/or is trying to flee, isn't what I consider building SD type skills. Maybe if all your hunting is based on hunting big/dangerous things on the ground at close range with a handgun, that are actively trying to kill you, yea, that's more in line with things.

As far as kids go with the larger caliber guns go, a lot of that is up to the kids and how they were taught to shoot. No doubt, size and ability have a lot to do with this, but kids in the 10-12 year range really shouldn't have too much trouble with things like a 1911, High Power, Glock etc, with the proper guidance. And like any of us, the more they shoot, the better they get.

Prime example here. Looks like she has the right attitude and encouragement. :thumbup:

 
How could one ever ensure that when the things that one must hit to "count" are small, moving irregularly and rapidly in six axes, and completely hidden?

Hitting any of them is a matter of luck. The likelihood of effecting a stop increases markedly when more rounds strike the attacker..
.....since IYO, the chance of hitting your opponent, is nuttin' but shear luck, it sounds like you are promoting the ol' "spray and pray" philosophy when it comes to SD. Accuracy and practice don't matter, just keep pullin' the trigger and hope. Actually, COM on a target @ 7 yards is pretty large and easy to accomplish. One shot to COM is going to do more than 5 to the limbs, and better than 10 going off in every direction towards innocnet bystanders.

I hate to keep inputting hunting to this, but there are many similarities. For most, when game is sighted our heart rate increases and adrenaline flows, just like in a SD scenario. Even when a bird is in front of a pointer, we do not know exactly which direction it is going to go, if it is going to run first before flying, or if indeed it is even legal game(hen or rooster). Even the biggest of pheasants have a COM much smaller than a human and many times move at a faster rate, and are moving to escape, to to intercept. Yet fol;ks hit them all the time and not out of shear luck. Growing up as a kid in rural Wisconsin in the 60s, there was nuttin to do in the winter time but hunt rabbits. We got so good at it, that we left the shotguns at home and hunted them with our .22s. After a while we got pretty dang proficient at it, even tho their COM was much smaller than a human, they were running and hopping faster than any human is capable of and the distance was generally much farther out than normal SD distance. It was much more than luck and most of the time it was with a entry level firearm and ammo. At my personal range, I have an old spring powered extension cord reel that used to have 100 ft of extension cord on it. It now has about 100' of parachute cord with a horesball on the end. Used to be a tetherball, but have upgraded to a ball that keeps it's shape better without air. It's a great tool for practicing for SD against Humans or DG and is hard to do without getting excited. With practice, it gets to be not that difficult to hit, even tho it is no larger than COM.

I ain't saying I'm an expert or great at SD, I know I'm far from that. But I'm not one that believe that a hit on an opponent during a SD scenario is going to be nuttin' but luck. Otherwise, why practice? Why even carry a gun, why not just hope you're lucky and the BG misses? I'm also one who is not telling folks my way is the best for them too. My way works for me, and that's all that matters. I am confident in what I carry, even if others aren't. My hoping for luck is not that I will hit an opponent, but that I am lucky enought to never have to use a weapon in SD.
 
As mentioned in another thread, a couple of things happened recently that have me considering rethinking what I carry.

The 2nd thing was when I was shooting with my 13 year old son last weekend, he decided he wanted to try shooting my carry gun. He'd never shot anything bigger than 9mm in my Dan Wesson Guardian. 2 rounds fired. First hit the 8" steel at 25'. 2nd went who knows where, but the recoil really bothered him and he was done shooting it.
I become incapacitated and I'm unable to defend my kid or myself. He knows how I carry and how the gun functions and would ideally give himself a chance at least. But he can't shoot this gun.
There are training methods/drills to deal with when: ""I become incapacitated and I'm unable to defend my kid or myself.""

These drills most often start out with you leading him thru any hostile environment/crowd, with him having his weak hand on your shoulder as he walks behind you, and his strong hand having access to your gun.
This is assuming you carry at 3/4/5 o'clock and are both right-handed, so he can reach/draw the gun.
What happens next depends on what you encounter, and you can alert your son with predetermined signals (i.e. raising your hands, etc.).
Your son (or wife) will be able to identify these non-verbal signals by your shoulder movement and respond accordingly.
I suggest you find someone who can train you this or some online vids you can review.
jmo,
.
Edit: And while he is following you, he will be watching your 3/6/9 as you concentrate on straight ahead.
 
Last edited:
Accuracy and practice don't matter, just keep pullin' the trigger and hope.
Skill and accuracy absolutely make a difference. It's not a matter of spraying and praying, but it is unrealistic to assume there will be no misses.
Actually, COM on a target @ 7 yards is pretty large and easy to accomplish.
I've seen people miss human-sized silhouette targets in training classes at closer than that distance when shooting on the move. And that's with the target stationary and no one shooting at them.
 
.....since IYO, the chance of hitting your opponent, is nuttin' but shear luck,
I did not say that. I said that hitting a critical internal body element with any one shot is a matter of luck--a matter of chance.

it sounds like you are promoting the ol' "spray and pray" philosophy when it comes to SD.
No.
Actually, COM on a target @ 7 yards is pretty large and easy to accomplish.
Yes, if one is good--but what counts is what the bullets hit inside that zone--things that are hidden, moving, and inside that moving three dimensional body.

At a MAG-10 course some years ago, Mas Ayoob urged everyone to acquire, study, and keep close at hand a copy of Gray's Anatomy. He had a reason for that.

And--one will have little time. Seven yards? In the old Tueller drill, that's where the defender starts the draw--if he is lucky. He is then faced with a rapidly closing target a much closer distance.
 
A while back, Ayoob had an article in the American Handgunner about a foot chase and shootout that broke out between a cop and bad guy, that happened at a distance of 5-6 "FEET". Both shooters using 45acp, the cop a Glock, the bad guy a stolen SIG P220. 23 rounds fired between them in 5-10 seconds, both guns to slide lock. The bad guy got one hit out of 9, the cop 7 out of 14. Both lived too.

There are a ton of police shootings on body cam on the web that show what a real, close range encounter is like, and its nothing like what you usually hear from those telling you its going to be all over with a well placed round or two.
 
So my concerns are:
1- I can't honestly say I carry the gun I shoot best.
The pistol I shoot best is a Super 14 Thompson-Center Contender in 30-30 Winchester.
I do have a holster for it, but it is a bit bulky . . . sorta heavy too.

On the plus side, one hit will certainly do the trick.
 
Last edited:
As mentioned in another thread, a couple of things happened recently that have me considering rethinking what I carry.

The first thing was shooting my carry gun (Officer size SIG 1911 .45) in a competition and getting smoked. Granted, I was shooting my bone stock gun against a CZ Orange running an optic, Comp, etc...but felt like I should have been able to make it respectable. I didn't.

The 2nd thing was when I was shooting with my 13 year old son last weekend, he decided he wanted to try shooting my carry gun. He'd never shot anything bigger than 9mm in my Dan Wesson Guardian. 2 rounds fired. First hit the 8" steel at 25'. 2nd went who knows where, but the recoil really bothered him and he was done shooting it.

So my concerns are:
1- I can't honestly say I carry the gun I shoot best. I know I can't carry a competition level gun, but I do shoot the DW better. It's got a bigger profile and isn't as easy to conceal though.

2-I don't choose what to carry based on how someone else shoots my gun, but the thought crossed my mind... We'd talked about a situation when we're out somewhere, things happen. I become incapacitated and I'm unable to defend my kid or myself. He knows how I carry and how the gun functions and would ideally give himself a chance at least. But he can't shoot this gun.

Overthinking? Worth considering? Complete overhaul needed?

A few questions . . .
  1. What type of competition (USPSA, IDPA, ??) and what division?
  2. How much experience do you have and what is your classification?
I ask because getting "smoked" in USPSA or IDPA or any other game with any variant of points/sec scoring is rarely just a matter of equipment. Experience, skill level, stage analysis and planning, and athletic ability typically play a bigger role than the gun (although there are exceptions).

You could switch to a gun that you shoot better based on objective criteria (such as the accuracy and speed needed to do well in USPSA and IDPA), or you could shoot the gun you chose to carry more often (in dry practice, live fire practice, competition, and training) so that it becomes the gun you shoot the best.

For what it's worth, I shoot the same gun (or an identical copy) in competition, training, and practice that I rely upon for defense.
 
In competition, there's such a thing as fair/unfair. In a self-defense encounter there's only whether you can shoot better and faster than the other guy with your equipment or whether you lose. You get no handicap for the gun you pick and no consideration if he's picked a gun that is easier to shoot and holds more rounds than yours.
That would be the tail wagging the dog to me. Buying a gun for capacity only.
 
I just had another thought. I think a lot of shooters who never try action-oriented competition or professional training tend to consider only accuracy in slow fire when determining which gun they "shoot the best." Unfortunately, other factors come into play when using a firearm for defense.

I think a better idea to evaluate what you shoot best is to include other parameters into the testing. For example, how about testing (with a shot timer) using a Bill Drill? For those who don't know, that's drawing from the holster at the start signal and firing six shots at an IPSC Metric Target (now known as the USPSA Target) at seven yards and only A-zone hits count. If you carry concealed, do the drill using your actual carry holster, the actual type of concealment you use daily, etc. Do it a few times to get a baseline average time for getting the six A hits from concealment. Then, do the same with any other gun you are considering, also from concealment exactly as you would carry it. The one that allows you to get the six good hits in the shortest time should be the front runner for your carry gun.
 
In competition, there's such a thing as fair/unfair. In a self-defense encounter there's only whether you can shoot better and faster than the other guy with your equipment or whether you lose. You get no handicap for the gun you pick and no consideration if he's picked a gun that is easier to shoot and holds more rounds than yours.
Yes, that.
And the safety aspect ingrained in (run/gun) competition can be a handicap in a self-defense encounter.
jmo,
.
 
That would be the tail wagging the dog to me. Buying a gun for capacity only.
I certainly wouldn't recommend buying a self-defense/carry gun based solely on any single feature it provides, whether that's low recoil, high capacity, caliber, concealability, weight, sights, etc. A good decision will take all the gun's pertinent features into account to ensure a good balance is struck.

My comment was more oriented towards the idea that there's such a thing as fair/unfair comparisons when it comes to carry/self-defense guns. Fairness is a concept that has to do with rules and competitions. If you end up in a gunfight for your life, there won't be any fair/unfair there will only be whether you win or lose. If you run out of ammo before the other guy does and he kills you, then you won't get a do-over because he had an unfair advantage of higher capacity. If he can shoot his gun in low light and you can't see your sights and you get killed, you will get no consideration for the fact that his gun is better equipped than yours. If he shoots better than you, you won't be able to complain that he should be competing in a higher performance class. If his gun recoils less or he happened to steal a gun with a compensator and he can get more accurate shots off in a shorter time period than you can and that puts you at a disadvantage, you can't complain to the match director about the disparity in performance between the guns.

That means the goal isn't to pick a gun based on "fair comparisons" with other guns, it's to pick a gun that gives you the best chance of success when everything is considered. It needs to be easy enough to carry that you won't look for excuses to leave it at home. It needs to carry enough ammo that you have a reasonable chance of dealing with whatever you consider to be a reasonable threat, based on a realistic assessment of miss rates in real-world gunfights and a realistic assessment of what it takes to actually do the job with a good hit. It needs to be a gun you can shoot well enough that it doesn't unduly handicap your performance. It needs to be one you will practice with. And so on and so on...
 
In competition, there's such a thing as fair/unfair. In a self-defense encounter there's only whether you can shoot better and faster than the other guy with your equipment or whether you lose. You get no handicap for the gun you pick and no consideration if he's picked a gun that is easier to shoot and holds more rounds than yours.
Plus the crook has the advantage of surprise, knows exactly who and when they intend to strike, and don’t give a hoot about liability if they miss and hit others.

Best to do all you can to level out the odds with good equipment and training.

Stay safe.
 
Recoil is an issue that isn't always taken as seriously as it should be. Even for folks who are completely immune to the psychological aspect, physiology still takes a toll: nobody is as fast with a hard kicker as with a light one.

And then there are all the folks who aren't immune - and that includes almost all of us. The 13 year old is probably a good example: nearly everyone is going to be affected by a hard kicking gun. It was only a few decades ago that the .357 was considered the limit of human endurance, and that a .32 was a rational solution. Physiology hasn't changed during the intervening years, and a .45 still kicks.

For the most part, I agree with the folks who argue that the first hit usually wins. If you can get that hit with a .500 Magnum then good for you. If you are like most of us, though, then you are far better off with a cartridge you can control not only on the first round but also on the fiftieth.
 
As mentioned in another thread, a couple of things happened recently that have me considering rethinking what I carry.

The first thing was shooting my carry gun (Officer size SIG 1911 .45) in a competition and getting smoked. Granted, I was shooting my bone stock gun against a CZ Orange running an optic, Comp, etc...but felt like I should have been able to make it respectable. I didn't.

The 2nd thing was when I was shooting with my 13 year old son last weekend, he decided he wanted to try shooting my carry gun. He'd never shot anything bigger than 9mm in my Dan Wesson Guardian. 2 rounds fired. First hit the 8" steel at 25'. 2nd went who knows where, but the recoil really bothered him and he was done shooting it.

So my concerns are:
1- I can't honestly say I carry the gun I shoot best. I know I can't carry a competition level gun, but I do shoot the DW better. It's got a bigger profile and isn't as easy to conceal though.

2-I don't choose what to carry based on how someone else shoots my gun, but the thought crossed my mind... We'd talked about a situation when we're out somewhere, things happen. I become incapacitated and I'm unable to defend my kid or myself. He knows how I carry and how the gun functions and would ideally give himself a chance at least. But he can't shoot this gun.

Overthinking? Worth considering? Complete overhaul needed?

You likely need to learn recoil management, which means you likely need to learn to actually shoot. My guess is that your gun is not the problem and your training is the actual problem. This could only be confirmed on the range spending time with you analyzing what you are doing. Given that I cannot see what you are doing, I'm going to guess and give you some assignments so you can discover your own path.

You can try Paul Sharp's "Recoil Mitigation" material. However, while I highly recommend his material, there is no substitute for experience. You should consider attending a variety defensive shooting courses from different trainers. I took a wide variety of courses and got many different perspectives on shooting.

Shooting with a coach means you have someone evaluating what you are doing during a string of fire. I cannot emphasize this enough. Even just shooting with a friend will be helpful to you. However, a professional will notice those tiny details that make all the difference in your shooting.

Always remember that mastering the fundamentals means you can master shooting. Flawed fundamentals will hold you back and turn into bad habits. ALWAYS GO INTO CLASS LOOKING AT THE FUNDAMENTALS THE TRAINER IS TEACHING OTHERS. Not only will you pick up some tips, you will start learning how to teach others. This will help your development over time.

You'll learn so much more in one 8-10 hour block than a series of one hour sessions. Nothing like a bunch of bloody fingers and botched magazine changes with a Browning High Power to convince me to switch to a Glock.

My recommendations are to take your primary gun:

1) Try Paul Sharp's material (appended below). Watch the video with at least one friend. Go to the range with this person. One acts as teacher, the other student. Then switch. Take 200 rounds and give it enough time (at least 2 hours) to make sure you get it.

2) Attend any two day defensive pistol course. Local is good since it reduces costs, but obviously some of the big name schools are really good.

3) Attend a longer course within six months, including:

Rogers Shooting School https://rogersshootingschool.com/
Rangemaster https://rangemaster.com/
Thunder Ranch
Gunsite Academy
Mas Ayoob MAG-40

4) Create/beg/borrow/steal a dry fire regimen that includes drawing the gun and includes metrics. You can use Mantis X for this. Commit to 15 minutes of dry fire per day.

5) Attend any sort of competition that includes pistols.

6) Finally...read some books.

"Guns, Bullets and Gunfights" by Jim Cirillo
"No Second Place Winner" by William Jordan
"Practical Shooting" by Brian Enos
Any other interesting book

----

Paul Sharp's "Recoil Mitigation"




Training points:

Mitigating muzzle rise from the wrist (Videos 1-4):

1) Lock wrist on each hand that is touching the gun
2) Hard pinky finger pressure
3) Push thumb(s) forward hard
4) Proper grip: High in the tang, high under the trigger guard. Forward thumb on support hand. Check by placing trigger finger and support hand thumb on frame. They should be equal on the frame (point up to check).

Test by attempting to bend the wrist upward. Instructor places finger on wrist tendon to verify (Video 5). The shooter will tighten up and prevent as much movement as possible.

Mitigating side to side muzzle movement (Videos 6-7):

1) Tighten the elbow of each hand on the gun
2) Tighten the shoulder of each hand on the gun

Test by attempting to move the gun in a circle.

Mitigating gun push backwards (Videos 8-13) :

1) Use hard push-pull. Some people think push-pull doesn’t work in a fight so an alternative is to bring your elbows down a bit to pinch your palms together.
2) Push from the primary hand shoulder.
3) If support hand is on the gun, pull back into the primary hand.
4) Nose over toes. Stance is aggressive and nose should be over or slightly past the forward toe. There are no stances in a fight, but this is the optimal case.

Instructor tests by pressing with continuous pressure against the shooter's hand. Their head should not move very much. The instructor should watch for head movement by comparing to a static item in the background. Properly done, the shooter's head will barely move during recoil. Watch the shooter's toes. They should not rise.

Video 14 is a summary of training points.

The only addendum I have is that you can pinch your palms together a bit to tighten your groups up at speed.
 
Last edited:
A few questions . . .
  1. What type of competition (USPSA, IDPA, ??) and what division?
  2. How much experience do you have and what is your classification?
Pretty informal local stuff. Bowling pins and dueling trees. No timers-just head to head (except steel challenge which is rimfire only). Some accomplished competition shooters come down just for the practice and that's who I try to measure myself against.
 
Can you get it out of your pants or coat or whatever very quickly and get an accurate round off very fast?

If not, you might be rethinking the wrong thing.

I've never told anyone that they were carry something that looked large, slow, and awkward to deploy... but I've thought it quite a few times. ;)
 
Last edited:
Can you get it out of your pants or coat or whatever very quickly and get an accurate round off very fast?

If not, you might be rethinking the wrong thing.

I've never told anyone that they were carry something that look large, slow, and awkward to deploy... but I've thought it quite a few times. ;)
Leave me. And my 10" 44 Magnum. Carried IWB. Alone.
1707764012132.png


:neener:
 
Back
Top