Of late we've had multiple threads involving comparing one cartridge to another, One recurring theme appears to be that many folks don't grasp how bigger-faster isn't necessarily better and may not be worth the costs of a bigger cartridge.
To start off lets compare 264win mag to 260rem and 6.5grenedel
120g bullets in all cases, velocities as per my "ballistic" Iphone app. Case capacities represent grs of water.
the 264 win mag has a case capacity of just under 80grs @ 64,000 psi
The 260 comes in at 54grs @ 60,000 psi
Lastly the diminutive 6.5 Grendel which holds 35.0grs @ 50,000 psi
This means the 264 magnum is 128% larger than the Grendel and 48% larger than the 260rem with a much higher pressure rating to boot.
Given this disparity someone not in the know MIGHT assume that the 264 is going to be twice as fast as the 6.5grendel. So lets compare the velocity numbers for 120grain loads
264 mag- Nosler 120g B-tip 3250 FPS
260 rem- Federal 120g B-tip 2950 FPS
6.5 Grendel- AA 120g B-tip 2520 FPS
as a percent of 264's velocity
260---89%
6.5G--70%
So given just how little you're giving up with a smaller cartridge in terms of ballistics the real question becomes a matter not of bullet drop but one of Powder consumption, recoil and barrel life. Is it really worth in the case of 260 vs 264 burning almost 50% more powder and suffering with only a quarter of the barrel life to gain 10% in external ballistics.
For me and many others probably not. THIS is what folks are referring to when they speak of the law of "diminishing returns". Which all boils down to the fact that no matter how big your case the expanding gas from the burnt propellant can only get out that hole in the end of the case so fast to push on the bullet and it only has the length of the barrel to try to do so.
And no I'm not on some sort of vindictive anti magnum or 264 trip. These examples were used as they represent one of the most extreme spreads where the same bullets can be compared (apples to apples)
To start off lets compare 264win mag to 260rem and 6.5grenedel
120g bullets in all cases, velocities as per my "ballistic" Iphone app. Case capacities represent grs of water.
the 264 win mag has a case capacity of just under 80grs @ 64,000 psi
The 260 comes in at 54grs @ 60,000 psi
Lastly the diminutive 6.5 Grendel which holds 35.0grs @ 50,000 psi
This means the 264 magnum is 128% larger than the Grendel and 48% larger than the 260rem with a much higher pressure rating to boot.
Given this disparity someone not in the know MIGHT assume that the 264 is going to be twice as fast as the 6.5grendel. So lets compare the velocity numbers for 120grain loads
264 mag- Nosler 120g B-tip 3250 FPS
260 rem- Federal 120g B-tip 2950 FPS
6.5 Grendel- AA 120g B-tip 2520 FPS
as a percent of 264's velocity
260---89%
6.5G--70%
So given just how little you're giving up with a smaller cartridge in terms of ballistics the real question becomes a matter not of bullet drop but one of Powder consumption, recoil and barrel life. Is it really worth in the case of 260 vs 264 burning almost 50% more powder and suffering with only a quarter of the barrel life to gain 10% in external ballistics.
For me and many others probably not. THIS is what folks are referring to when they speak of the law of "diminishing returns". Which all boils down to the fact that no matter how big your case the expanding gas from the burnt propellant can only get out that hole in the end of the case so fast to push on the bullet and it only has the length of the barrel to try to do so.
And no I'm not on some sort of vindictive anti magnum or 264 trip. These examples were used as they represent one of the most extreme spreads where the same bullets can be compared (apples to apples)