Well, I bought the 3-9x32 (has the dual colored lighted reticle). Bought a simmons 3-9x32 and a truglo trushot 3-9x32 as well. All cheap scopes. The simmons and Trulgo went on Ruger 10/22's and the center point went on a 597. The simmons was the closest to center upon initial sighting. Shot a nice tight group after sighting in. The Trushot was off quite a ways, but had enough adjustment to get to the bullseye and shot a nice tight group there after. The center point was all the way to the right side of an 50 yrd target. After much adjusting, it still shoots wherever it wants too, no two shots are anywhere close to another.
I cannot verify as of today that its all the scopes fault, but prior to scoping these three rifles, for plinking purposes, I thought the 597 was the most accurate of the bunch with open sight. I'm pulling the scope tomorrow to try target paper with the open sites and see what happens. I got a feeling I got a bad Center point. If that's the case, I'll try to return it to Dick's Sporting Goods, probably not for another Center Point. I'm sure if the scope is bad, the next one will most likely be 'ok', its just that out of the 3 scopes, the Center Point is the most difficult to sight through, but does have a tad better appearance through the optics than the Truglo Trushot. The Simmons had the nicest optics of the 3 and I believe it was the cheapest of the 3.
While I would like a nice scope on my 22, I just don't want to spend much over 50-60 bucks for one. So.... I try out the cheap scopes and hope for the best. If I end up returning the center point, I think I'll try a bushnell, although I should probably just get another Simmons. I'd really like to have the Nikon Rimfire, but I just don't want to spend that 100 bucks.