Changing your carry gun?

Every gun magazine these days seems to have a new "ultimate" carry pistol on the cover. I was a long-time 1911 guy, then moved to Glocks years ago. I have continued to be satisfied there and assembled the magazines and holsters for those guns. Was not impressed enough with the new guns to change. Lately I have begun to switch to a Beretta 92X Compact because it has the first DA/SA trigger I personally like, it's accurate and proven (heavy yes, but I'll deal with that) and it just fits my hand. How many of you have made a shift to a new platform in the face of all these "new" guns coming to the market?
You are right, the Beretta 92X Compact is heavy. But that is the only derogatory mark I can find with the piece. Quite some time ago I purchased one (decocker only) on a whim. The trigger was great and accuracy was fantastic. This pistol is so slick and easy to operate and a big plus it’s so easy to clean. Normal carry for me is a much smaller and lighter pistol, but with winter coming on and a heavyweight coat, the Compact Beretta may get some carry time.

IMG_1426.jpeg
 
index.php


I have been a pocket carry fan for a very long time:
I started with the CZ-45 in 25 acp about 35 years ago.
Switched to the NAA Guardian in 32acp for more power when it first came out.
Switched to the LCP in .380 when it came out. Considerbly lighter weight and bigger bullets.
Added the KelTec P32. I carried the P32 every day at work where printing and flashing were not an option.
Added the Kahr CM9 which I found to be too big to pocket carry. I carried it IWB when I wanted bigger bullets.
Added the XDs in .45 acp. The size is close enough to the CM9 that I stopped carrying the CM9. The XDs became my IWB big city gun.
Added the Diamondback DB9 which became my daily pocket carry and mostly replaced my LCP. But I still carry the LCP depending on what I am wearing.
The XD mod 2 in .45 acp is my woods / big city IWB gun with its 9 round magazine. With the 13 round magazine it is my nightstand gun.
The Remington R51 is junk. I paid $150 for it on a close out. I over paid.
I picked up the CZ-75D compact for $300 and never liked it. The ergonomics are all wrong for my hand and it is WAY too heavy. I will always choose the XD mod 2 .45 over the CZ. I gave the CZ to my girl friend because she really liked it and it fits her hand quite well. It is her home protection gun.
The NAA 22wmr's are just fun. I will pocket them in the middle of summer when wearing shorts or a swimming suit. One of them will often go kayaking with me.
 
Last edited:
For the last couple of decades, I have been changing up carry guns. I keep coming back to the same J frame for pocket carry.

The full size or compact on the hip- they're all so easy to shoot, I could carry anything. Right now it's an aluminum frame Browning Hi-Power.

I would have saved a lot of money over the years if I had just stuck with what works. But the little guns are neat. I just couldn't help myself.
 
I haven’t changed my ccw pistol per se, but I did just add a Primary Arms micro dot to my Glock 43X. This will require me to become familiar and competent with this new sighting device.

IMG_3090.jpeg

(This is now my third dot-equipped pistol so it’s not totally new.)

Luckily the sights on board can be seen and used if the dot croaks, which gives me a bit of extra confidence in case the sight is damaged or fails.

IMG_3093.jpeg

Looking forward to getting this sighted in and ready for carry.

Stay safe.
 
Luckily the sights on board can be seen and used if the dot croaks, which gives me a bit of extra confidence in case the sight is damaged or fails.

IMG_3093.jpeg


Looking forward to getting this sighted in and ready for carry.
Mind, my preference (others' differ) is to get the dot at 12 o'clock on the front sight with irons lined up. If the dot is ever out for any reason, the aimpoint is the same no matter what.
It's absolutely not the way I'd set up a sight on a carbine or rifle.
But it works for me.
Your Goldilocks may be different.
 
When I first got my carry permit in the early 1990s, I carried the only handgun I had: a huge .44 magnum that I'd bought from a guy in my church who needed money. My carry ammo was .44 Special. Needless to say, that got old quickly. I went to a couple of .357 4-inch revolvers but the cylinders pressed against me when I sat down and that got old, too. I went to a S&W 457 for awhile (my very first .45 semi-auto). It was a good solid gun and ate everything I fed it but it didn't carry comfortably and I always shot low with it. I traded the 457 in on a Springfield 1911 but couldn't hit all that well with it, either. Eventually, I tried Glocks, which I can hit with better than any other handgun I've ever owned. Plus, I finally had something I could carry comfortably, too....at least, at that time. That worked for me for several years until I started getting a little more "chubby" and didn't want my roscoe to be so noticeable, even under a draped-over shirt. I pretty much figured out that the way I had to go was to go toward more concealment. A couple of years ago, I started pocket carrying a Charter Arms Undercover .38 and a Keltec Pf9 I bought for a relative that didn't work out for her. At first, I preferred the Charter because it seemed to be quicker and less "snaggy" coming out of a pocket, but I improved my draw and I'm now starting to see the PF9's advantages: more power, bettter choices in ammo, more shots before a reload, and I can hit with it better than the Charter. I could care less what the new trendy carry gun is. I'll keep what I already have and make it work, I'm tired of changing.
 
Last edited:
I haven’t changed my ccw pistol per se, but I did just add a Primary Arms micro dot to my Glock 43X.
Let us know how that PA works out for you.

I'm currently running the Romeo Zero, Romeo 1 and a Trijicon RMR (6.5 MOA dot and ridiculously expensive, cost more than the pistol!) To be honest, I have just not become hooked on RDS for pistols yet, likely because I haven't committed to them yet, but mainly because I feel that if I start using them all the time, I won't give all my other handguns (especially the revolvers) the range time they deserve... Kinda feel as though iron sights are sufficient for any self-defense scenario this old retired guy is likely to encounter. Now if I still had to qualify quarterly or semi-annually, I'd be all over the RDS for my duty weapons.
 
The old "tried and true" comes to mind when carrying for self defense. I Sleep with and carry the same pistol day in and day out...
 
I started carrying with a Ruger SP101.

Then a SA XDs in 45acp.

Now I have two carry guns. A Sig P938 Legion is my small CC gun, and a SA XDm Elite 3.8” in 10mm.

Woods carry is typically a full size steel framed gun in 10mm.

I had a Hellcat but sold it to fund something else. I may pick up another one.

Marketing is good for information gathering on availability, but multiple user reviews are far more valuable for making a decision. Try not to let the new flashy, magic, best thing since sliced bread marketing cause you to waste money and space in your home.

That being said, if you never try something new, you may actually be missing out. Changing platforms isn’t a bad thing, it just needs to provide a measurable benefit.
 
Shorter Answer: My hands have aged-out of wanting to try new concealed-carry-oriented compact guns, and my retiree’s budget is not ideal for accommodating the thousands of rounds that I would want to fire, in order to develop unconscious competence with a new system. The last time I adopted a totally new-to-me pistol system was in 2002, and that was when I had to choose a new duty pistol, from among four choices. My beloved 1911 duty pistols, which were “grandfathered” under the older firearms rules, were not working well with the then-mandated duty holster, so, I reluctantly transitioned to the Gen3 G22, for police duty, and added G27 and G29 pistols for back-up and personal carry. (In actual practice, I tended to carry revolvers during personal time, rather than the Glocks.) After a couple of years of being disappointed with my accuracy potential, with Glocks, I discovered that there was an optional trigger available for SIG pistols, that enabled me to get “enough finger” on the face of a double-column-mag SIG. I’d had prior experience with the SIG P220, which I had liked. So, I got away from Glocks, for a number of years, but eventually returned to the Glock system.

Notably, Gen4 and Gen5 Glocks fit me better, resulting in better accuracy potential than when I was using Gen3 pistols, during my first go-‘round with Glock.

Longer Answer: My last totally voluntary switch/change/transition, to a totally new pistol, though not a new system/platform, was to the SIG P229 DAK, in 2004. While I was somewhat constrained by the weapon policies of the PD which employed me, I really liked the P229. The SIG P229 grip shape fit my hands better than the Gen3 .40 Glocks I had been using, and the SIG’s slide protrudes less to the rear, which improved concealability, compared to the blockier Glocks. I’d used an old-school P220, 1991-1993, for both duty and personal carry, so, I was not unacquainted with the SIG platform, but, the wider grip frame, the optional slim factory trigger, and the DAK trigger system, represented a substantially different weapon. Notably, DAK was my personal preference. Most of my colleagues, who opted for SIG, were using DA/SA.

I gradually started reverting to Glocks, though 9mm Glocks, this time ‘round, in 2012/2013, for “orthopedic” reasons. I wanted to step-down from .40 S&W, and and use a weapon with a lower bore axis than my SIG P229, .40 S&W duty pistol. I had to keep using the SIG as long as I was assigned to uniformed patrol, but, could apply for an investigative role, which would enable me to use a Glock G19 as a duty pistol. First, I bought a pre-owned Gen3 G17, to make sure that a 9mm Glock would be noticeably easier on my aging hands. Then, I bought two “blue label” Gen4 G19 pistols, after discovering that the Gen4 was a noticeably better fit, in my hands. In September 2015, my then-chief OK’ed 9mm to be an alternative duty cartridge for uniformed patrol, so, I immediately bought a “blue label” Gen4 G17, which became my duty pistol, and often my personal-time carry gun, too.

I have, since then, added more Gen4 and Gen5 Glocks. I retired from LEO-ing in 2018, so, all handgun carry is now “off the clock.” In the absence of any such thing as department policy, I could adopt a totally new handgun system, for carry, if I chose, but 9mm Glocks continue to make sense, for carry, some of the time. I do not always carry Glocks. I still carry 1911 pistols, occasionally. A 1911 was my very first handgun purchase, at age 21, in late 1982 or early 1983, largely because I was a history buff, with much interest in the World Wars and subsequent conflicts during the Cold War. I have added some revolvers, recently, too, though no new “platforms” that I had not already been using for a number of years. My handgun I am most likely to carry, these days, is a K-Frame S&W snub-gun, not unlike one that I ordered while attending a police academy, in late 1983.

In case the above makes me seem like I do not like trying new pistols, well, I did plenty of wild experimenting and switching, in the Eighties and Nineties. By the late Nineties, when I was in my late Thirties, I was settling-down, and might well have finished my days, using 1911 pistols for duty and some personal-time carry, and DA revolvers for just about everything else, supplemented by the occasional pocket pistol for special purposes.

Notably, this is all about carry guns. Collecting is a separate hobby. I do not feel a need to carry my collectible firearms.
 
The progression: LCP>Ruger P95>XD45>XD40>Sig P220>Sig P226>Sig P365>Sig P229>Sig P239. P239 40SW is carried 95% of the time with a back up mag. P365 is only carried when I'm in gym shorts and running a quick local chore.
 
Let us know how that PA works out for you.

I'm currently running the Romeo Zero, Romeo 1 and a Trijicon RMR (6.5 MOA dot and ridiculously expensive, cost more than the pistol!) To be honest, I have just not become hooked on RDS for pistols yet, likely because I haven't committed to them yet, but mainly because I feel that if I start using them all the time, I won't give all my other handguns (especially the revolvers) the range time they deserve... Kinda feel as though iron sights are sufficient for any self-defense scenario this old retired guy is likely to encounter. Now if I still had to qualify quarterly or semi-annually, I'd be all over the RDS for my duty weapons.
For those contemplating; Adding a red dot to a ccw gun is something that will require enough shooting to get used to several things.

The most obvious is “finding the dot” on a draw. If you are practiced and familiar with automatically finding the sights on the draw, the dot is going to appear in your screen as expected.

Racking the slide is different, as I am a “hand over” slide-rack guy and the sight is on the rear of the slide. My hand needs to move forward a bit more, again a practice/familiarity thing that will take a bit of time.

When cleaning, don’t touch the glass! I accidentally did so with oil on my finger and it took a bit of effort to clean it off.

The dot does obscure a bit of target if you are shooting for precision. (These are 5:8” sized blacks on these air gun targets). The shots at 7 yds landed close, but not right on the spots (yet, I hope!). A bad guy sized target is not that small, so for the vast majority of potential engagements Micro-precision isn’t as big a deal as it is in a bullseye match. I think I still need to move the poi just a hair to the right, that is my goal for my next range trip.

IMG_3102.jpeg

I did shoot out to 15 yards, they all stayed well within the 9 of a B-27.

The Primary Arms dots are pretty good for a sub $150 tool. The Micro fit right on the 43X and the larger one went right onto a 507c footprint on my aftermarket Glock 17 slide. Both took very little adjusting right out of the box, just a bit of turning of the screws with the provided hex key and bullets went where they need to go..

The dots I bought don’t have a “shake awake” feature so I will have to turn it on/off as I carry and put it away. (The literature says it shuts off after 12 hours) The sight will need to come off to swap batteries, so when that happens I will know how much of a re-zero job it will need.

For a decent dot at an entry-level price I am happy with these PA units. They probably don’t have all of the features of a $300+ unit, but they certainly seem better than Rugers new $100 non-battery, non-zero able “dots”. I read the review, those got pretty much eviscerated in Gun Tests this month.

Stay safe.
 
With any of my carry/home defense handguns, I can look at an aim point a few yards away, close my eyes, sidestep (or not), draw (or bring the gun up from low ready), point the gun at the object and when I open my eyes, the sights will be aligned and the gun will be pointed at the aim point with an error of less than 6". I can do that either with a one hand hold (strong handed--still need some work weak-handed) or a two hand hold. I'm not talking about being able to do this at the end of a long practice session where I've been repeating it over and over--I'm talking about doing it cold, on the first try.

I'm sure I could learn to do that with other guns that fit me/point differently, but I don't see why I should put in the effort. My current carry guns were picked partly because they pointed naturally for me. So I won't be switching carry guns unless I find handguns that are suitable for me in terms of manual of arms, reliability and other requirements and that also fit me/point the same as the ones I'm using now.
 
I buy and sell stuff and try different things regularly because it entertains my curiosity. Variety is the spice of life and I'm always hunting for the next thing. I settled on an LC9s pro like 8 years ago and nothing has come along to dethrone it. When the Max 9 came out, which is just a double stack LC9s, I didn't care for to look or the sights so I got another LC9s slide and put it on there. So now my two most frequent carry guns are the same gun but with the option of an 8 round single stack mag or 12 round double stack mag. I carry the lc9s when I want to pocket carry and the max 9 when I want to wear my OWB holster. I doubt anything will come along anytime soon to dethrone those two but never know. I suspect I'll be carrying them 20 years from now feeling like an old fart with my outdated guns like some of the revolver and 1911 guys feel like now. When I can no longer get fresh night sights for them that will probably force my hand.
 
I mostly bounce between a 1911 or a Glock 19. Others come and go but I always seem to end back up with one of those.
 
Recently bought a Shield Plus and a LCP Max----have been bouncing around those 2 with a 642 once and a while---getting ready to attempt to carry a 3in 629 in the winter--but waiting for the gun to come back from S&W.
 
Started out concealed carry with just revolvers: Charter Arms Undercover, and later with a S&W Model 38. When I added semi-autos to the mix it was with a Colt Mustang. Then after awhile a move to 9mm., by way of a Kahr CM9. Eventually I replaced the Model 38 with a S&W Model 649 and a Model 638. I still use them both, as well as the Kahr. But now I have focused on some of the more popular Micro-9s, like the SIG P365X (frontrunner), the Glock Model G43X and G48, along with a S&W Model Shield Plus. I also picked up a Ruger LCP Max as a "slip in a pocket" auto; just like I used to do with my Beretta Jetfires, especially when making a late night run to the store!
 
I'm in the process of switching to a 3" Tauris 856 - .38 Special, 3" barrel. It weighs 17 ounces. I'm trying to replace separate hiking gun, and coat pocket gun with one. This seemed like the right thing to try for that. 17 ounces.
 
i’m a revolver guy, for decades my carry and home piece was some 2 or 3” j frame 38sp by taurus, s&w or rossi. about 4 years ago i bought a keltec p32 pistol on a whim, it’s now my preferred ccw. the revolvers are mainly for home or field use now.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2379.jpeg
    IMG_2379.jpeg
    220.9 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Snubbie, then Glock 26, now mainly Ruger LCP max with 12 round magazine in pocket. I think I carried my 1911 once and my Glock 17 once.
I am experimenting with appendix carry and apparently it is easier to conceal a larger gun that way.
 
I changed not because of a new gun, but because of one that was no longer available.

I carried an XD45C for perhaps 20 years; pretty much ever since they first came out. But Springfield recently stopped selling the XD.

So, about a year ago, I switched to an M&P9C.

Both are reliable, easy-to-shoot guns in effective calibers. I still have several XD45s. But I now carry an M&P.
 
Back
Top