ClickClickD'oh
Member
[QUOTE="wojownik]... decision in Bateman v. Perdue[/QUOTE]
I don't think Bateman v. Perdue is applicable in this case since that was based on a far more wide reaching law that even went as far as to prohibit the purchase or sale of ammunition, the transportation of weapons or ammunition from site to site and even hunting in rural areas.
That was as narrowly tailored as an atom bomb, especially considering NCs tendency to declare state wide emergencies for cloudy skies. A law like that, which is clearly just a catch all, has no chance of surviving scrutiny by the courts.
A better set of cases to look at would be how courts have handled Free Speach Zones.
I don't think Bateman v. Perdue is applicable in this case since that was based on a far more wide reaching law that even went as far as to prohibit the purchase or sale of ammunition, the transportation of weapons or ammunition from site to site and even hunting in rural areas.
That was as narrowly tailored as an atom bomb, especially considering NCs tendency to declare state wide emergencies for cloudy skies. A law like that, which is clearly just a catch all, has no chance of surviving scrutiny by the courts.
A better set of cases to look at would be how courts have handled Free Speach Zones.