CraigC
Sixgun Nut
I'll give you a good example. I got my 4 5/8" Super Blackhawk back in the mid 90's. As you probably know, the short barreled guns have the standard XR3-RED grip frame on them. The .44Mag was brutal with full loads and I could only stand to shoot maybe 50rds in a sitting. Same for shooting "Ruger only" loads in a friend's .45Colt Vaquero. After a couple years, I decided to convert it to a Bisley with the kit from Brownell's. I got the Hogue cowboy grips because they were cheap. I found out that they were nice and thick and perfectly rounded. After all the filing and sanding, I had the grip frame fitted well enough to shoot it. The first shots fired were a religious experience. It was actually comfortable and fun! It strikes a fine balance, distributing the recoil evenly between thrusting back into your palm and levering up as muzzle rise. It's not trying to wrench itself through your hand, it's easy for your grasp to roll with the grip frame. No pain. No discomfort. No hot spots. Pure pleasure. Sometime later I found out how much of a difference the Hogue grips made compared to the thin and poorly shaped factory grips.Craig......How does the recoil impulse compare: Bisley vs. SAA or Ruger BH/Vaquero? I've never fired a Colt or Ruger's version of the Bisley, and wondered if the gun still rotated up and back in recoil...a motion much more comfortable in my hand than any DA revolver...this is with heavy loads where it makes a difference.
Just mimicking the grip angle...it seems to me that the SAA/Ruger BH leaved my wrist in a more or less 'neutral' position; whereas the Bisley requires the wrist cocked somewhat up to achieve the same barrel angle...tough to explain in words....Rod
The Colt pattern is different. It wants to naturally point the muzzle down, more so than the Ruger. It takes some getting used to but I find it comfortable with the Keith .44Spl load.