Colt: The Continued Soap Opera.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have worked in union shops and nonunion. No difference in the quality of product based on union status. Quality control is a function of the quality control system that the management puts in place.
Sorry, but me, too...for about the last 30 years.
There is one big difference.

It is nearly impossible to fire a piece of crap union employee. And the big problem is that they know it...and the pieces of crap prosper and multiply.

So no matter what policies are "put in place"...they are un-enforceable.
And that is where the problems arise. Discipline...grievance, mediation, arbitration, employee re-instated....most likely with full pay.
Every other employee hears about it and knows that he is un-touchable.
What kind of climate does that produce? Use your imagination...or do some google-fu.
 
Sorry, but me, too...for about the last 30 years.
There is one big difference.

It is nearly impossible to fire a piece of crap union employee. And the big problem is that they know it...and the pieces of crap prosper and multiply.

So no matter what policies are "put in place"...they are un-enforceable.
And that is where the problems arise. Discipline...grievance, mediation, arbitration, employee re-instated....most likely with full pay.
Every other employee hears about it and knows that he is un-touchable.
What kind of climate does that produce? Use your imagination...or do some google-fu.
Yep. A plant I worked at a few years ago finally just closed it's operation down at a sister facility in Canada because the CAW was just too much to deal with. They put the plant up for sale, moved all the production to other plants and let the building rust away with no interested buyers. So what did that union do for its members other than ensure that they became unemployed in the 2008 slump? Zilch.

Now, applying this to Colt. They have been in financial trouble for a while snd haven't taken action to fix that. The action could have been based on throughput, profitability, soft expense, etc, but it would have been the same thing most likely. Move the bulk of production to the plant or plants with the best numbers. Most likely that a non-union shop where production goals are part of a merit pay system and you never hear "that's not MY job".

Since I'm in EHS professionally I also see where the unions came from. There was a point in history that they were absolutely a good thing. They helped fight big money for safe working conditions and pay rates that a person could survive on, not to mention laws governing fair treatment of employees. Those things that were fought for are now federal and state laws. The unions hayday is over. They now are cumbersome and detrimental. Any company who is not healthy and thriving should be going out of their way to either stay non-union or to become non-union by following the laws and treating their employees well.
 
Getting repetitive.

Let's try the Judgment From God angle for a while, just for something different. :)

I'll start it: Colt has pissed off a higher power and wrath floweth.
This bankruptcy filing is just the beginning, the Plagues Of Egypt follow.

Next?
Denis
 
:eek: I think I will check my portfolio and make sure I don't have any bonds from any company in which Sciens might have a remote interest. :scrutiny:
 
Last edited:
that god thing might be a nice change of pace. usually, when something good happens, people shout IT'S A MIRACLE ! then they run around rejoicing.
i notice when something bad happens they don't mention who gets credit.
 
Good point. :)
Denis

I think, just to get out of the same rut, we could go a few more rounds with this, and then move out of religion & into politics by blaming the Democrats.

Maybe once they wind down, we could move on to the Masons being behind it all.
 
Last edited:
NO. Labor issues are small beer compared to what Science has done to the company with its financial engineering and machinations.

Forget the union and labor stuff. Read the following article to really understand the pathological Financials of Colt: http://mobile.breakingviews.com/storypage/story.aspx?id=21203911

I really appreciate your postings. Thank you.

It gets irritating to read about "QC" concerns when it doesn't appear that Colt has any. Similarly with "union" issues which no longer seem to exist -- Colt's labor has been very supportive of the company when CT passed new gun control laws. At least we haven't seen the "move them to Texas" fetishers weighing in lately...
 
move the whole company to texas :neener::neener::neener::p

LOL .. niice one.

So, here's a question. An affiliate of the current owners (Sciens) also has 30% of the company that is landlord to Colt. They own the land and property on which Colt currently resides.

So, if Sciens is forced out as Colt owner, what is their next move as Colt landlord?

And, if Colt has to move, what is the possible downtime to move an operation of this scale. Months? Years?
 
LOL .. niice one.

So, here's a question. An affiliate of the current owners (Sciens) also has 30% of the company that is landlord to Colt. They own the land and property on which Colt currently resides.

So, if Sciens is forced out as Colt owner, what is their next move as Colt landlord?

And, if Colt has to move, what is the possible downtime to move an operation of this scale. Months? Years?

Why would they have to move? Unless they cannot pay the rent, I'm sure they have a lease...
 
They have a lease. According to the article posted in #128, it expires in October which gives Sciens a key bit of leverage if their 30% interest gives them any influence in the comany that holds the lease.
 
Well, business being what it is, driving a tenant from a building or raising their rent just for spite may not make a lot of sense if your building is going to set vacant for awhile. I just did a quick search and it looks like the economy in Hartford isn't all that great.

http://www.bestplaces.net/economy/city/connecticut/hartford

CT. also is also listed as one of the worst states in the country to own a business for tax reasons.

http://taxfoundation.org/blog/map-2014-state-business-tax-climate-index

This is just another reason I think the company surviving in it's present location isn't possible.
 
Colt: Florida ...

First: Once again, like other topic posts, I'm not saying Colt is or will relocate all staff or skilled labor to central Florida. I'm also not saying only younger Colt workers can produce high quality firearms. :confused:
My point(s) are the Colt labor is mostly older now. If no new employees or staff learn the required tooling, engineering, design skills then who will fabricate the Colt firearms of the future? :uhoh:

I'm not a union member now but would join a trade union if required. I do agree that unions can permit problem employees to stay on or put demands/constraints on the company.
A local news station did a recent media item on how a public transportation service retained or kept bus drivers who had traffic accidents/unsafe driving incidents. The drivers would file union grievances or civil service complaints. :rolleyes:

Colt doesn't seem stable or viable at this point. Maybe a larger company can sweep in then buy the entire firm but that corporate action may lead to major changes with the production lines/firearms.
 
Two things most (not directed at Rusty) who casually say "They just need to move!" are not taking into consideration is that there WOULD be a disruption in production that could last from several months to well over a year, and that most of the workers would not move from Conn to places as distant as Texas or Florida, leaving homes, families, and lifetime friends behind.
Especially those older workers, long established with solid roots in Conn.

Both would severely impact at least availability, and while a new workforce was being trained, it could easily affect quality too.

Such a move would also cost Colt a huge chunk of money, and as you've seen here- huge chunks of money are not just sitting around in Colt's bank account.
Denis
 
Maybe some good news for a change....

Apparently Sciens and Colt's current owners/management are not going to get what they want without a fight. It looks like their rose-colored plan may be about to hit a big speed-bump. :uhoh:

Emerald Capital Advisors Seeks Financial Advisor Assignment for Colt Creditor Committee

Colts Creditor Committee will be formed in Delaware Bankruptcy Court on June 25, 2015

Delaware – Monday, June 15th, Colt Defense, filed for Chapter 11 protection in the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware. Sciens Capital Management also announced its intent to become the stalking horse for Colt Defense, in which it already holds a majority of the equity.

Emerald Capital Advisors is a leading financial restructuring shop focused on advising distressed situations, with a core competency in representing Official Creditors Committees in Chapter 11 cases. In the last decade, Emerald Professionals have represented in excess of 45 Official Committees. Emerald Capital Advisors is led by John P Madden, the founder and Senior Managing Director of Emerald Capital. John has more than 17 years of direct experience advising various types of clients in all phases of both financial and operational restructuring. Emerald will be seeking the assignment as the financial advisor to the creditor committee, an effort bolstered by its Senior Advisor, and industry veteran, Michael H Blank. Mr. Blank is no stranger to this type of an effort having worked the shutdown of the Winchester licensee US Repeat Arms in 2006. Mr. Blank also handled the Sabre Defence collapse in 2011 and has had involvement in a host of similar deals in the industry working for both creditors and bidders.

"I am reaching out to those who are facing financial uncertainty do to this situation" said Mr. Blank. "This includes not only bondholders and trade creditors, but all unsecured creditors alike. Sciens has put forth a plan, but things rarely go according to plan. This is definitely true in situations like this where so much is being contested in court." Blank continued, "Let's face it, despite best intentions Colt has made some serious missteps to be in this much trouble despite a boom market that was concentrated in the products to which their brand should own in the marketplace." Mr. Blank went on to state that he is optimistic that this still strong brand will attract a lot of interested parties, particularly as their brand does have such a role to play in both the concealed carry and the MSR segments. "Colt is one of those brands that has always held a special place in the hearts of the gun owners, not only in the US, but across the globe. It's hard to quantify what the value of that is to a go forward operation at this moment, but there definitely is value and that value, at this time, is what we will try to help harness to the benefit of the creditors."

Contrary to the current plan put forth by Sciens, John Madden believes the bankruptcy process will last much longer than the originally proposed 60-90 day period and further, he believes it is unlikely that Sciens and the current management team will be in place at the end of the process. "Due to Sciens Capital Management attempting to completely wipe out the bonds and retain equity ownership - despite not putting any new capital into the Estate - their proposed transaction, which effectively attempts to end-run the Absolute Priority Rule, will be strongly contested." Mr. Madden also asserts that since the current proposed bid is effectively zero cash consideration, it sends a strong signal to the market place that may trigger a robust auction with many interested parties. "As in all Chapter 11 363 sales processes, the transaction still allows for higher and better bids, and the low floor set by Scien's Stalking Horse bid may spark interest from strategic and financial purchasers who have been following the situation closely." Madden added that, "In addition to purchasers, there will also undoubtedly be competing Plans of Reorganization that are proposed as alternatives to a sale.

" Due to the current proposal (which will be heavily scrutinized as an insider transaction by Judge Silverstein), the objection of the bondholders, competing plans, and the potential for many unknown purchasers, it is crucially important that unsecured creditors (bondholders and trade vendors) get active in the process. Considering the uncertainly of the Company's future, unsecured creditors cannot count on any promises from current management. Those who seek a seat on the Unsecured Creditor Committee afford themselves the chance to get unprejudiced, professional services of the Committee's choosing. These Professionals are paid for by the Debtor's Estate and can help attain assurance for payments on pre and post-petition claims, as well as ensure a healthy, well capitalized entity to do business with post restructuring.

About Emerald Capital Advisors

Emerald's comprehensive platform is supported by extensive research, in-depth knowledge, and access to capital, with a reputation for providing clear, unbiased, innovative solutions to distressed companies and their stakeholders across all industries and sectors. For over 17 years, Emerald professionals have advised distressed companies or their constituents across all levels of the capital structure on a myriad of transactions ranging from large complex deals to small unique situations exceeding $100 billion in aggregate debt restructured.

Contact: Michael H Blank MBlank@EmeraldCapitalAdvisors/646-861-2475

See more at: http://www.shootingwire.com/story/349462#sthash.QiBEWVBP.dpuf

http://www.shootingwire.com/story/349462
 
First: Once again, like other topic posts, I'm not saying Colt is or will relocate all staff or skilled labor to central Florida. I'm also not saying only younger Colt workers can produce high quality firearms.
My point(s) are the Colt labor is mostly older now. If no new employees or staff learn the required tooling, engineering, design skills then who will fabricate the Colt firearms of the future?...

You haven't made this point. You keep expressing your opinion, but you haven't proven that Colt has an inordinately old workforce.

Colt doesn't seem stable or viable at this point. Maybe a larger company can sweep in then buy the entire firm but that corporate action may lead to major changes with the production lines/firearms.

Colt will always be "viable" -- its health depends on how much debt it will have to service. Unless something really unexpected happens, I suspect the value of Colt should it go through a C11 reorganization is more than any company would be willing to pay for it, hence no one is going to buy it.
 
They have a lease. According to the article posted in #128, it expires in October which gives Sciens a key bit of leverage if their 30% interest gives them any influence in the comany that holds the lease.

I'm not sure that it does. I'm not sure they would be willing to shoot themselves in the their heads just to be vindictive about things should they not prevail in BR court.

Ultimately, I think they would be thankful to have a tenant even if they do lose...
 
That is a good and sensible argument, but does not alleviate the threat if Sciens decides not to be good and sensible. Since they are portrayed as big, bad meanies, there can be an advantage in threatening to act as portrayed. If the threat doesn't work, they can be good and sensible then.
 
If Blank's getting into it (Mr. Save Winchester & Mr. Merwin Hulbert), I've just lost hope for Colt.

Smoke & mirrors.
Denis
 
If Blank's getting into it (Mr. Save Winchester & Mr. Merwin Hulbert), I've just lost hope for Colt.

Smoke & mirrors.
Denis
Honestly, didn't sound like you held out much hope for Colt before this.

At a minimum it just means that the existing owners insider strategy won't go unchallenged. And it doesn't preclude another strategic buyer coming in from the wings either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top