I'm sure most of you have read how many companies have finally gotten a pair and are starting to boycott states that pass laws to infringe upon the 2nd Amendment. Notable heroes are Magpul, Olympic Arms, and possibly Beretta if they leave Maryland. The big question is what happens when large departments like the NYPD renew their contracts with a company like Glock when it comes time? I completely agree with the stance of some of the gun makers they will NOT knowingly support criminal behavior and when the state of NY uses its authority to usurp the 2nd Amendment right of its citizens they will not sell them weapons to enforce it but when it comes time, will people support Glock when they decide to continue arming the NYPD? Or would you rather they take the same stance and refuse to renew its contract with them? Would it effect your purchasing decisions in the future if they did continue to arm the police in states where they choose the oppress people's rights? I was in the market for a Glock this year but personally I'm going to wait and see how they handle the situation. I'm spending money on those companies that are taking a stand.
Edit: After reading the rules of this portion of the forum I thought I would clarify to be a bit more "concise". What I am proposing is that we support the companies that are taking a stand for the 2nd Amendment against the states that are oppressing it by showing our support to those companies to offset the cost of that stand AND we show our displeasure with those companies who don't support that position by showing them we will no longer buy their products if they support states like Colorado, NY, and Maryland. I would also suggest we avoid spending ANY money in those states. Money talks louder than words in many cases. Additionally, I want your opinion on whether or not companies supplying the law enforcement of those states will factor into your future purchasing decisions.
Edit: After reading the rules of this portion of the forum I thought I would clarify to be a bit more "concise". What I am proposing is that we support the companies that are taking a stand for the 2nd Amendment against the states that are oppressing it by showing our support to those companies to offset the cost of that stand AND we show our displeasure with those companies who don't support that position by showing them we will no longer buy their products if they support states like Colorado, NY, and Maryland. I would also suggest we avoid spending ANY money in those states. Money talks louder than words in many cases. Additionally, I want your opinion on whether or not companies supplying the law enforcement of those states will factor into your future purchasing decisions.
Last edited: