Sour Kraut
Member
Ouch....those are potent loads!
thanks for the info!
thanks for the info!
I have seen many hikers open carry in the Smokies. Part of it is I like concealed carry for self defense against 2 legged threats. The other is my pack design makes open carry harder than in the waist pocket. The waist belt hits to low for a waist holster. I would need to find a leg holster.If you have a CCW, and it's recognized in Tennessee, why not open carry?
They have black bears and have had bears attack humans and fatalities in the Smokies.
I also plan on hiking Yellowstone and have seen Grizzlies there in the past.
I’ve lived within 45 minutes of the Smokies for 69 years. I can’t remember an instance where a bear attacked a person that didn’t provoke the bear. Usually someone tries to feed the bear a cookie and the bear swats the person and injured or kills them but this is rare. I remember a teacher trying to feed one a few years ago and the bear knocker he head off with one swat. Attacks are pretty much always because someone got too close or was feeding the bear. I’ve seen people do it and seen a photo of a tourist putting their child on the bears back.
If you want to see a bear up close and personal keep food in your pack where they can smell it. If they can detect food they’ll find you. Bears venture into Gatlinburg and wander into shops looking for food. I’m 45 minutes from the park and a bear was seen in my neighborhood. The even venture into the city, Knoxville downtown, looking for food. About two years ago one wandered into the Knoxville Zoo and climbed a fence into the bear habitat looking for food and companionship.
bears have gotten lazy and look for the easy food from campers and hikers and have destroyed a few cars looking for food.
Other than attracting a hungry bear your biggest danger is getting lost. Weather is unpredictable and changes quickly. It’s not unusual for hikers to be killed by lightning or get lost and die of exposure in colder weather.
As far as 2 legged critters, it’s extremely rare for there to be any problems on the trails.
Have fun! Be safe!
This in a Simply Rugged Chesty Puller rig.
View attachment 934504
If I'm concerned about animals that might eat me the last thing I want to worry about is digging a handgun out from some hidden spot.
I’m sorry, but I would want something more decisive than a condiment that may or may not work. I’m not opposed to having both a firearm and bear spray at your disposal, but if you really want to end a threat...
As I mentioned earlier my Wife will be carrying besr spray.
There's plenty of "brown," as well as cinnamon and blond Black Bears in Yellowstone and Grand Teton (right next door) National Parks. Did you see any Grizzlies?
Sorry, I'm not trying to be a wise guy. It's just that there's a lot of people that think Black Bears are black, while Grizzlies are brown, and that is simply not true. Not that you couldn't have very well seen a few Grizzlies in Yellowstone - there's something like 800 of them in and around Yellowstone, and a bunch more just a little north of there, in and around Glacier National Park.
That said, I carried a heavily loaded Ruger 45 Colt or a heavily loaded Taurus 41 Magnum (along with bear spray) for bear protection when my wife and I were into backpacking. I didn't carry concealed though - didn't see a reason for having my handgun concealed when my wife and I were 30 miles into the Idaho wilderness. There are both Black Bears and Grizzlies in Idaho too BTW, along with wolves and mountain lions.
However, I can very well see the reasoning behind your wanting to carry concealed if you're occasionally going to be running into other people on your hikes. As a matter of fact, running into other people all the time is one of the main things my wife and I disliked about the few hikes we did in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks - where I did carry concealed. But as far as that goes - almost every time we saw a bear (either Black or Griz) in Yellowstone or Grand Teton National Park, there was a bunch of gawkers standing around staring, and getting entirely too close as far as we were concerned.
Yes the 41 mag is a little hand cannon. I have not had any problems with the little Taurus. Fact is all three guns are very reliable.I voted the 686. Bottom line is that I wouldn't be comfortable carrying any of these if I really thought I needed to deal with a black bear, which admittedly in the region you describe, should not be horrifically formidable in terms of size and weight. The barrels are all too short.
That said, a lot of people in a lot of fora over the years have scoffed at .357 vs even black bear, whereas 10mm is now ubiquitous in AK to deal with browns/grizzlies and its record in doing so has been quite good.
I put a chart together for these calibers:
cal type fps lbft momo cap
357 mag 158 jsp 1471 759 232 7
357 mag 180 HC 1400 783 252 7
10mm 200 HC 1250 694 250 16
10mm 220 HC 1200 703 264 16
45 Sup 230 FN 1100 618 253 13
45 Sup 255 HC 1075 654 274.125 13
45 ACP+P 255 HC 925 484 235.875 13
41 mag 230 Keith 1450 1074 333.5 5
where I compared caliber to bullet type, typical velocity (mfr), energy, momentum in g*fps/1000, and typical capacity (for .45 I used HK USP and I referenced 45 Super along with what I'd consider the best round for woods duty in 45 ACP+P)
Nobody considers the 10mm inadequate at this point yet we can see that .357 in 180gr HC offers more energy and either more or nearly the same momentum as 10mm in either of the load types typically used for "bear duty." The 45 Super while lower in energy is the momo king between the 357, 10, and 45. Alaskan Ballistics has done penetration comparisons between 10 and 45 Super; they're basically equivalent.
The 41 is significantly more powerful than any of these, however, you're in a Taurus, with a short barrel, and 5 shots. It will produce more terminal effect from this platform than either of your other weapons, but controlalbility has got to be poor from that pistol. A 3.8" barrel in 45 is right at the threshold for me for use against humans- reference Lucky Gunner's test results to see that .45 suffers a considerable falloff in velocity in quite a few rounds, along with precipitous drop in energy and effectiveness as barrels get really short. I switched to .40 for short barrels because that caliber is more tolerant to shorter barrels.
For SC black bear, I think .357 is easily enough just on the numbers with the right ammo. The .45 even in +P, with a 3.8" barrel, is just not packing the right punch. A full size maybe but a compact? All you have is round count going for you. For these choices, the 7 rounds in the 686+ with 180g HC is probably what I'd go with. 2nd choice is the .41 just on the power of the cartridge...but it would be a handful with that barrel and that platform.
Other than attracting a hungry bear your biggest danger is getting lost. Weather is unpredictable and changes quickly. It’s not unusual for hikers to be killed by lightning or get lost and die of exposure in colder weather.
As far as 2 legged critters, it’s extremely rare for there to be any problems on the trails.
Have fun! Be safe!
Thanks for the mapThis is a map of actual bear fatalities in North America from 2000 to 2018. I posted it on another forum and it was scoffed at. Surely bears are more deadly!
View attachment 935791
LOL! Your post was post #71. It's usually brought up sooner than that.Isn't this where someone brings up the bear that was killed with a .22LR?