Nightcrawler
Member
First I had a .45 Colt revolver, then a .41 Mag, then a .45ACP, then a .357...
Folks, it's time Nightcrawler finally got with the program and got himself a .44 Magnum. A good "do all" gun.
I'm not really considering it for a concealed carry piece. Utah is too hot most of the year to wear enough clothing to conceal an N-Frame revolver.
So, I want a 629 .44 Magnum. I'll need to save up money, of course, and some guns that I don't use so much might go to the chopping block to provide funds, but...yeah. It's time I stepped up. I love my 625 and all, but it's weight inefficient for its power levels. The 686+ is a neat revolver, and I like it, but...well, I've always been a big bore guy. I think I'd rather have .357 in a snubby. I don't have much use for a 4" duty type gun in that cartridge.
So, yeah, Nightcrawler needs a 629. Question is...4" or 5"? I must say, I love the look and feel of the 5" full underlug N-Frames, and the 5" 629 Classic would fit the holster I've got for my 625 5".
But the 4" guns are lighter, easier to pack, maybe less easy to shoot well? Faster to draw? Faster on target? Talk to me.
Tell me what you prefer in a .44. Given the choice between the two, a 4" or a 5" tube, which would you choose and why?
Again, not really a CCW piece. A range and field gun mainly (assuming I ever have time to go afield). Don't hunt, but I might. .44 Mag is good for just about anything.
Mainly going to be shooting light loads through it. Those .44 Mag "cowboy" loads, a 240 grain LSWC at 1,100fps seem just about right. And they can be had in bulk for cheap.
So, sell me. 4" or 5", and why?
Folks, it's time Nightcrawler finally got with the program and got himself a .44 Magnum. A good "do all" gun.
I'm not really considering it for a concealed carry piece. Utah is too hot most of the year to wear enough clothing to conceal an N-Frame revolver.
So, I want a 629 .44 Magnum. I'll need to save up money, of course, and some guns that I don't use so much might go to the chopping block to provide funds, but...yeah. It's time I stepped up. I love my 625 and all, but it's weight inefficient for its power levels. The 686+ is a neat revolver, and I like it, but...well, I've always been a big bore guy. I think I'd rather have .357 in a snubby. I don't have much use for a 4" duty type gun in that cartridge.
So, yeah, Nightcrawler needs a 629. Question is...4" or 5"? I must say, I love the look and feel of the 5" full underlug N-Frames, and the 5" 629 Classic would fit the holster I've got for my 625 5".
But the 4" guns are lighter, easier to pack, maybe less easy to shoot well? Faster to draw? Faster on target? Talk to me.
Tell me what you prefer in a .44. Given the choice between the two, a 4" or a 5" tube, which would you choose and why?
Again, not really a CCW piece. A range and field gun mainly (assuming I ever have time to go afield). Don't hunt, but I might. .44 Mag is good for just about anything.
Mainly going to be shooting light loads through it. Those .44 Mag "cowboy" loads, a 240 grain LSWC at 1,100fps seem just about right. And they can be had in bulk for cheap.
So, sell me. 4" or 5", and why?