Well, let's look at the specifications - -
Dr.Rob makes a very good point. It may well be unimportable, thanks to the provisions of GCA 1968. Unfortunately,
THAT law did NOT sunset.
If this little
pistola is from CZ, I'll stipulate it must be well made and reliable.
Working out the calculator a bit, it appears to me that weight, 309 grams, equals very close to 10.8 ounces. Eight rounds of .25 ACP?
How is the CZ92 better than, say, the Kel Tec P32? Slightly higher and wider, 2/10" shorter, three ounces heavier, and 8 .25 ACP vs. 7+1 of .32 ACP. And, just for grins, toss in the KT P3AT specs for comparison - -
CZ92 (From the CZ site)
Caliber: 6,35 mm Browning (.25 Auto)
Magazine capacity 8
Overall length 125,5 mm
Barrel length 64 mm
Height 94,5 mm
Width 24,2 mm
Weight 309 g
KT P32 (From the Kel Tec web site)
Technical Specifications
Calibers: .32 AUTO
Weight unloaded. 6.6 oz. 186g
Loaded magazine 2.8 oz. 81g
Length 5.1" 129mm
Height 3.5" 89mm
Width .75" 19mm
Barrel Length 2.7" 68mm
Sight radius 3.8" 96mm
Muzzle energy max 200ftlbs 240J
Capacity 7+1 rounds
KT P3AT (From the Kel Tec web site)
Caliber: .380 AUTO
Weight unloaded: 7.2 oz
Loaded magazine: 2.8 oz
Length: 5.2"
Height: 3.5"
Width: .77"
Sight radius: 3.8"
Muzzle energy max: 250ftlbs
Capacity: 6+1 rounds
Trigger pull: 5 lbs
Friends, I'll bet it
is indeed a
COOL GUN - I just wonder if it's an improvement on what we already can easily obtain?
Best,
Johnny