Disarming William Tell? (times are changing in Switzerland)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Disarming William Tell?


by Bob Kroon, 24 January 2003

Patrons of the Dynamik snackbar, take note: "No firearms in this restaurant.'' But that does not apply to Dynamik owner and arms dealer Ricardo Teixeira. Two .44 Magnums are in full view on the bar and Ricardo totes a Czech CZ pistol and a 9 mm Heckler & Koch in side holsters. Outside, the shooting range reverberates with the staccato of small-arms fire.

A Hollywood film stage in Texas? Not exactly. Dynamik is a canteen-plus-armoury in the Geneva countryside, and there are hundreds of such establishments in peaceful Switzerland.

The number of firearms in this Alpine country is a multiple of the seven-million population, reflecting the Swiss tradition of the arms-bearing citizen, the heritage of the legendary William Tell, the 13th century national hero – even if his existence has never been proven.

The arms supermarket of Europe
Like used cars, small arms can be freely traded in Switzerland, or legally purchased in dozens of armouries or via the Internet.

The Swiss army is a national militia, with an army rifle in the home of every able-bodied citizen. So far, no problem. Swiss criminals may settle their scores with knives or clubs, but usually leave the official shooting-iron alone.

But even in this placid Alpine country times are changing. In 2001 a deranged burgher used his army weapon to decimate the cantonal parliament of Zug. Last year guns blazed in more than a dozen bloody family feuds.

To curb the mayhem and counter Switzerland's reputation as the ‘arms supermarket of Europe', the federal government wants to enact stringent arms control laws. In the future, gun aficionados or collectors will need official permits to buy or exchange their hardware and police can search homes without warning for ‘particularly dangerous weapons,' – such as the lethal 50 BMG, a favourite toy of one shooting club in the Bernese Oberland. This long-range sniper's rifle with laser-scope can knock out an armoured personnel carrier from a distance of one kilometre.

Pro-Tell lobby
But the Swiss arms lobby is no less militant than its American brothers-in-arms of the National Rifle Association. The ‘Pro-Tell' lobby, grouping hundreds of thousands weekend-shooters, is lambasting the government project as "a sinister attempt to disarm the people.'' The new rules, Pro-Tell darkly warns, herald "a slide toward dictatorship."

But polls suggest that a majority of the people, women in particular, are in favour of shackling the gun toters, tradition or no. Ultimately, the issue may be decided in a nationwide referendum.

http://www.rnw.nl/hotspots/html/swi030124.html
 
The NRA is considered militant?? Somewhat huffy at times, but militant? As much as the NRA comprimisies, militant is not a term I would use. But I guess standing up for your rights, even on ocassion, is an alien concept to some people, and besides, we all know the NRA is an evil organization that promotes the unrestricted use and ownership of <gasp> guns.
 
"This long-range sniper's rifle with laser-scope can knock out an armoured personnel carrier from a distance of one kilometre."
:rolleyes:
 
In 2001 a deranged burgher used his army weapon to decimate the cantonal parliament of Zug.
a) He was not a member of the militia.
b) He was not issued the StGw 90 by the army.

Our Swiss members may please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
They must still be using the original Volkswagen Beetle as their "armoured personnel carriers" never having had a need for something with thicker armor. :rolleyes:
 
Zug killings trigger debate about gun laws

swissinfo September 27, 2001 11:37 PM

The killing of 14 people by a lone gunman in the Zug cantonal parliament has forced the authorities to reassess the security needs of public buildings and officials, and is likely to spark debate about the nation’s gun laws, which are among the most liberal in the world.


The gunman used a standard Swiss army issue assault rifle – a 5,6 mm SIG “Sturmgewehr 90†- to kill his victims, before turning the weapon on himself.

At the same time, another army issue assault rifle was used in a family killing in Lucerne, when a 49-year old Swiss killed his 23-year old stepson before shooting himself.

Both the killers may have been among the 500,000 Swiss men who keep their rifles at home. The population is heavily armed because of Switzerland’s militia system, which requires men above the age of 20 to be ready for a call to service. Soldiers also have the right to keep their rifles after they have been de-mobilised.

According to an army spokesman, Philippe Zahno, there are 320,000 “issue 90†assault rifles currently in circulation in Switzerland. In addition, at least 100,000 of the army’s older “issue 57†assault rifles and several thousand army issue handguns are stored in private households.

Parliament reacts

Parliamentarians have already called for the gun laws to be reviewed in the wake of Thursday’s killings. “We still had the pictures in our minds of the attacks in New York and Washington – and now the blind-rage attack in Zug,†said Social Democrat, Paul Günter, a member of the parliamentary committee on security affairs.

“The threshold of violent aggression seems to be coming down, and in such a situation we have to ask ourselves whether we can still entrust almost every male citizen with a gun.

“The situation is especially alarming with the issue 90 assault rifles, which are lighter and a lot more lethal than the older generation of assault rifles.â€

Within the next decade, the first issue 90 assault rifles will come into the private possession of newly demobilised reservists, as were the army’s older rifles.

There are also few controls on the sale of rifles held by ex-servicemen. The law requires that they draw up a sale contract with a buyer, registering his or her name and address. If bequeathed to a family member, army issue rifles can change hands even without that minimal requirement.

The Kosovo conflict

During the 1999 Kosovo conflict, ethnic Albanians were reportedly using Swiss army issue 90 rifles acquired in Switzerland to fight the Serbs.

Switzerland’s gun controls have repeatedly been debated in the past, but to little effect. Supporters of the right of every soldier to keep his rifle at home point to the fact that violent crime is relatively rare in Switzerland despite the liberal gun laws.

But Otto Schoch, a veteran army expert and member of the liberal party, expects the debate will change after Thursday’s massacre in Zug. “The professionals in the ministry of defence will discuss the problem soberly, but I’m less sure that politicians in parliament will be up to the challenge.â€

With the country’s gun law currently under revision, left-wing parties are demanding tighter controls. “As a minimum measure, the private sale and the inheriting of army issue hand-guns and rifles must be controlled in the same way that buying a gun in a shop is already,†said Günter.

Switzerland's gun lobby

After Thursday’s attacks, it’s likely that there will be calls to restrict the keeping of army weapons in private households. But any talk of restrictions would almost certainly run into against stiff opposition from Switzerland’s gun lobby.

Hans-Ruedi Sollberger, president of “Pro Tellâ€, an association fighting for the right of servicemen to keep army issue guns in their homes, thinks it is much too early to talk about tightening gun controls.

“I don’t want to talk about it before I know whether the killer in Zug procured his assault rifle legally or illegally,†Sollberger told swissinfo.

Pro Tell has said in the past that Switzerland’s liberal gun laws were part and parcel of Swiss “freedom†and “democracyâ€.

But Sollberger says he is more concerned with the need for continuous training of Switzerland’s reserve militia. “If reservists are not allowed to keep their guns at home, you can forget about the annual shooting course at a range in their town, which is still obligatory at the moment,†he said.

But politicians Günter and Schoch say that, since the end of the Cold War, there is little need for soldiers to keep their weapons at home. “It’s a Cold War concept. When it was feared that the Soviets could reach Switzerland within 48 hours, it was necessary for every Swiss reservist to be able to fight his way to his regiment’s assembly point,†says Günter.

As for the ideological merits of Switzerland’s gun laws, Schoch dismisses them outright: “The thought that we’re in any way lesser ‘Swiss’ if we don’t keep our own assault rife in a cupboard at home is ridiculous. The independence of our nation doesn’t depend on that.â€

http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=844363
 
And to add about Leibacher (the guy who killed 14 people in Zug):

- he wasn't allowed to own guns, yet he got a purchase permit
- he was known to own guns despite above fact

So the question remains why the authorities didn't act. Enforcement of current laws would have prevented this massacre.

If 10 politicians had carried a loaded pistol that day, Friedrich Leibacher would be a sidenote in history.

Unfortunately, I cannot push forward an investigation as I'm not a politician in the canton of Zug.
 
That proves that it's always the same.

The guy in Dunblane was known by the authorities, yet they didn't act.
The authorities in Erfurt had enough reason to check Steinhäuser, yet they didn't act.

And who pays for it? :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top