jrfoxx said:
I'd rather not get any warnings from mods
It would be heavy-handed to say "touchy," but this is an 'iffy' concern of mine. In fact,
I've discussed it with some mods.
For example, in the real world, we have
The Doctrine of the Reasonable Man. And I think it's a good one. If you're just about ready to sink your teeth into a scrumptious cheeseburger after loading padlocks for nine hours and long motorcycle ride which is now highlighted by a drunken townie belching threats into your ear, I consider it reasonable to stir him vigorously with a ash pool cue until he is the consistency of an emulsion which allows the effortless pouring of his remains into his double-wide. But I digress.
My point is that activity sanctioned in life should be the same standard for forums.
If some poser snorts at me, I should be able to use
reasonable language to chase the little goober back into his mother's basement. If I catch someone lying, I should be able to expose him, his handcuffs of fantasy and his galleria of Purple Hearts.
Or if he simply insults me, I should be able to comment on his kin and their ability to arboreal brachiate.
To my way of thinking, if those actions are done to my face, then my actions should be allowed when done to my computer. Short of that, (and if we ever have serious problems) we should just develop a "troll hole."
And to be fair, I have a pretty good relationship with the mods. And as in real life amid my personnel files at corporations, I'm establishing a fair record of PMs which begin, "Dadgum it Chico, what were you thinking...?"