Drug dealer's guns

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know where you'd find such statistics, or how one could determine with any degree of accuracy that "most" of them are stolen.

Here's a large sample size study from Chicago;

http://www.cityofchicago.org/dam/ci...ess Releases/2014/May/05.27.14TracingGuns.pdf

There's tons of articles out there about street guns;

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/11/u...ort-all-too-easily.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

The gangs and other criminals also get weapons through barter, or "trade-ins." The gangs trade narcotics for the guns of drug-addicted burglars, who will sell a $500 pistol for less than $100.

"We get half our guns through trade-ins with dope fiends," said a gang member on the South Side. "If you wanted a gun right now, we could put in an order and you'd have it. It's like going through the drive-through window. 'Give me some fries, a Coke and a 9-millimeter.' "

Terry spoke to one gang leader who got his first gun from a drug addict, had just bought 27 guns an addict stole from a retired police officer’s house, and regularly went to gun shows to buy and then resell at a substantial profit on the black market—a combination of the many ways guns are exchanged in the city.

Then you have Frontline and the ATF saying only 10-15% of street guns are stolen. (But that is surely different on a regional basis)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/guns/procon/guns.html


So, it really depends on whose study you read, but regardless, the stolen guns.. they're sold cheap!

The ones that are bought at gun shows / bought through straw purchases will be higher (as with the Mexican cartel purchases I linked before).
 
I really doubt the drug dealer paid much at all for the guns. How many buyers do you have for a hot Glock? Then on top of the lack of buyers the drug dealers money is leveraged. He didn't pay cash for the guns. He traded drugs at street price for the guns.

According to the article, if a drug dealer steals a gun from a family member or a friend it doesn't count as a theft. . An additional way criminals gain access to guns is family and friends, either through sales, theft or as gifts. Drug dealers also get guns from crooked FFL dealers. I do not know if the laws are different in other states but here in NC an FFL has to keep a bound book. He logs every gun that comes into the shop in his bound book. Once a gun is seized in a crime or from a felons hands it shouldn't require Dick Tracy to find where the gun came from.

From the document issued by the city of Chicago. The largest out-*‐of-*‐
state sources of Chicago’s illegal guns were Indiana, Mississippi, and Wisconsin,
which supplied 19 percent, 6.7 percent, and 3.6 percent of these crime guns, respectively. None of
these states have laws that require background checks for purchasers who buy firearms at gun
shows or on the Internet.

It is a federal law if you buy a gun online or at a gun show you have to go through a background check. How does state law supersede federal law? The city of Chicago wouldn't mind telling a bald face lie to blame someone else.
 
Last edited:
Point of the Thread

Who cares how much a drug dealer pays for guns?
Or, how many guns are stolen from homes?
Even how many illegal possession guns are around?

We already have laws against drugs (and dealers), and burglary, and felonious possession of guns, etc., et al, ad infinitum........

What we do need is to enforce the laws on the books (fully), and to eliminate loopholes in the law, and see that the violators "do the time".

At every angle, in every way possible, each of us needs to see that the law works, against the perp and for the honest citizen.
 
Last edited:
Johnny_B_Goode:
I do not know if the laws are different in other states but here in NC an FFL has to keep a bound book. He logs every gun that comes into the shop in his bound book.

FFL holders are subject to Federal regulations, which are the same in every state.

Johnny_B_Goode:
It is a federal law if you buy a gun online or at a gun show you have to go through a background check. How does state law supersede federal law? The city of Chicago wouldn't mind telling a bald face lie to blame someone else.

That is NOT a federal law (Thankfully!). Background checks are required to purchase firearms FROM DEALERS at gunshows, but NOT from a non-dealer individual, unless a state's laws require it. You can purchase a firearm online from a non-dealer individual in your state and not be required to have a background check, unless your state's laws say otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Johnny_B_Goode:

FFL holders are subject to Federal regulations, which are the same in every state.

Johnny_B_Goode:

That is NOT a federal law (Thankfully!). Background checks are required to purchase firearms FROM DEALERS at gunshows, but NOT from a non-dealer individual, unless a state's laws require it. You can purchase a firearm online from a non-dealer individual in your state and not be required to have a background check, unless your state's laws say otherwise.

At the prices charged by online sellers and the prices the reports quoted guns being sold at street level I would hardly think online sales would be an issue as no thug buyer is going to pay the over inflated online prices!
In Illinois you can buy a firearm from same state individual but the sale must be conducted face to face and, both seller and buyer must provide personal information and that information must be kept on record for ten years.
There is no requirement or law that a federal phone check need be conducted unless transfer takes place at a gun show.
CookCounty/Chicago is probably more stringent than the rest of the state, cannot transfer magazines larger than ten rounds, etc.
 
What we do need is to enforce the laws on the books (fully), and to eliminate loopholes in the law, and see that the violators "do the time".

At every angle, in every way possible, each of us needs to see that the law works, against the perp and for the honest citizen.

Like the straw purchase law that lands people in prison when they buy a gun for somebody who is completely lawful to possess/purchase guns themselves?

Or like the interstate transfer restrictions that make it a federal crime for a father to give his daughter a gun simply because they live in different states (both 100% legally able to buy and possess said firearm)?

Or the "gun show loophole" the antis keep raving on about? Because you know that as soon as you use that word, people's biases and agendas will lead to any number of PERFECTLY LEGAL activities being labeled as "loopholes" because it sounds more insidious than saying "perfectly abiding by the letter of the law"

"Enforce laws on the books" and "eliminate loopholes" comes off as a quick sound-byte answer a politician might give but it doesn't really address the problem, and strictly enforcing ALL of the laws that are on ALL of the books would really screw with a lot of "honest citizen's" lives.

Sometimes the problem really is too many laws, or overreaching laws, or laws that just plain should not be laws.

Not hint there illegal in my state except for the cocaine.


Nothing there would be illegal in the majority of states. But being a convicted felon with a restraining order he couldn't legally possess those in ANY state, including yours.
 
Last edited:
Handgun wise the Taurus 92 has been long time favorite. Very well proven reliable design.
 
I'm sure he was on his way to the police station to register all of his guns. That explains why he didn't have much blow on him.

On another note, is it just me or is that s really nice stock on the AK? Maybe he is a choosy thief?
 
On another note, is it just me or is that s really nice stock on the AK? Maybe he is a choosy thief?

That's a post-1989 Chinese MAK-90. (Or, Chinese Type 56S assault rifle)

Those stocks are pretty but the wood is soft and prone to cracking VERY easily.

They were cheap, reliable, and very well built - unfortunate that Bush banned Norinco products.
 
That's a post-1989 Chinese MAK-90. (Or, Chinese Type 56S assault rifle)

Those stocks are pretty but the wood is soft and prone to cracking VERY easily.

They were cheap, reliable, and very well built - unfortunate that Bush banned Norinco products.


Seems very anti-AK to have put something out on the street that is aesthetically nice, but operationally fickle.
 
Trent: How about people breaking into parked freight trains and stealing select-fire military rifles and hand grenades? Maybe they had inside tips.

An LEO was in his part-time job as security in a hotel lobby a few months ago, near the university in Lafayette LA.
He told me that this shipment was in a car trunk on a LA interstate. The very subtle ways 'certain' drivers use turn signals and change lanes
(or take the next ****) helped them spot this car.

Trained LEOs notice many trivial characteristics and patterns that few of us would catch.
 
Well the other guns and the cash are oriented correctly, so yes, that's a lefty AR.

I knew lefties were trouble.

Also, did someone suggest death penalty for drug dealers at some point?
 
He was probably going to turn the one once of cocaine into crack and double his money. I suppose with the cutting agents he wouldn't need a lot of cocaine to still make a profit.

Hopefully the guns go to a rightful owner or are auctioned off.
 
I cant believe these cops can actually keep job, its possible they hurt his feelings.....accusing a man of being a"drug Dealer" in these politically correct times would certainly have him properly labeled "undocumented pharmacist" with his "Assault weapons"........


I blame society for his troubles. :barf:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKIaS0lh-uo
 
Good eye, I caught that too. It has to be, the photo is not flipped look at the twenty's
Check out the shell carriers on the shotguns
 
Good eye, I caught that too. It has to be, the photo is not flipped look at the twenty's
Check out the shell carriers on the shotguns

Good call. The guns are obviously selected/chosen and set up for a lefty. Either somebody who was left handed had a bunch of his firearms stolen in the exact manner he had them set up and the thief/buyer didn't change them OR, more likely, this drug dealer was well armed with firearms he chose that were set up the way he wanted.

Despite being a convict from NY in CT.

Gun control. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top