Aikibiker
Member
As some of you may know I started working last year as a corrections officer. We don't use firearms very often in our job although we have a few secured at the jail for use on transports and just in case. I was aware that the agency issue handgun was a .38 revolver. Nothing wrong with this at all. While I prefer a semi auto I don't feel at all unarmed with a revolver.
Today I finally found myself inside the armory at the institution. What I saw in there was like a bizarre timewarp. I took the opportunity to peek into all the cabinets. We have a few AR-15 carbines and some Remington 870s. Nothing unusual about that. It was when I got to the ammo closet that my eyes bulged out. The duty ammunition that is issued to any CO walking in public with a gun is LEAD ROUND NOSE RELOADS. To my horror I found box after box of American Eagle along with boxes from a reloading company I have never heard of called "Zero". The ammo for the rifles was also American Eagle fodder.
Honestly I don't know how to express how disgusted I am by this. That a county sponsored agency would still issue LRN ammunition in 2005 blows my mind. That they are to cheap to buy brand new unfired brass is totally unforgivable.
Can anyone give me some advice on how to bring this issue up with the goal of changing this policy? I think citing liability issues would be a good lever. Any others?
Today I finally found myself inside the armory at the institution. What I saw in there was like a bizarre timewarp. I took the opportunity to peek into all the cabinets. We have a few AR-15 carbines and some Remington 870s. Nothing unusual about that. It was when I got to the ammo closet that my eyes bulged out. The duty ammunition that is issued to any CO walking in public with a gun is LEAD ROUND NOSE RELOADS. To my horror I found box after box of American Eagle along with boxes from a reloading company I have never heard of called "Zero". The ammo for the rifles was also American Eagle fodder.
Honestly I don't know how to express how disgusted I am by this. That a county sponsored agency would still issue LRN ammunition in 2005 blows my mind. That they are to cheap to buy brand new unfired brass is totally unforgivable.
Can anyone give me some advice on how to bring this issue up with the goal of changing this policy? I think citing liability issues would be a good lever. Any others?