First of all, I'm assuming a heated debate is about to ensue. This seems to be a much contended topic with 1911s.
There are two types of firing pin block with 1911s. Colt's trigger safety, and the Schwartz safetly. You're right that the Colt system is often thought to produce a sub-standard trigger pull. But the Schwartz safety, which was actually invented before WWII and is now used by Kimber, among others, is disengaged by depressing the grip safety -- it doesn't interfere with the trigger pull at all.
As for their need... mass accidental dischages? No. But they've happened. Now again, I'm talking mainly about 1911s here -- a healthy 1911 with no firing pin block should not fire if dropped muzzle down from a realistic height. The firing pin will simply not come down far enough or hard enough to pop the primer. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it needs to be dropped from a height of ~30 feet before you have a discharge in a gun with no firing pin block.
The problem you can have is with a broken, worn, or otherwise faulty firing pin spring. If that spring isn't strong enough to keep the firing pin to the rear, then it can happen.
The other scenario that could cause a discharge is the sear breaking or wearing down. Remember, the sear is basically the part that keeps the hammer cocked. Because the thumb safety and grip safety impede movement of the hammer via the sear and trigger assembly, the gun will discharge if the sear shatters. Unless it's equipped with a firing pin block. That situation is probably one in a million though.
Now the reason I'm talking pretty much just about 1911s is that I'm not aware of any modern pistol that uses no firing pin safety of any kind -- besides some 1911s.
Some will tell you they're "lawyer junk." And some will tell you they're necessary. I'm not even going to weigh in, because I don't feel like debating it. Just thought I'd help sort out some of the facts.