FK BRNO impressions...

Status
Not open for further replies.

bc1023

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
1,215
I picked up a BRNO pistol a few months ago and figured to report on it here. This gun is extremely impressive in every way. In short, the BRNO is heavily based on the tried and true CZ design from the mid 1970’s. However, it is modified to handle a much more powerful cartridge, producing 900-950 ft/lbs of energy. The heavy recoil spring, along with a 5oz weight is positioned well below the barrel to keep the recoil impulse low and lessen muzzle rise. The design is SAO, with no ambidextrous controls whatsoever.

Opening up the very sturdy case and you will find the gun, two 16 round magazines, an extra (heavier) recoil spring, an extra set of sights (3-dot), and a very nice full color owner’s manual. As you can imagine, everything is packaged extremely well. Even the cardboard outer case seems well done. The case is also serial numbered to the gun, which is a nice touch. The FK ships with a box of ammo.

As for the pistol itself, I must say that I’m quite highly impressed in every way. Build quality appears impeccable. The refinement and fit and finish is top notch. There isn’t a machine mark anywhere on the gun inside or out. The entire pistol has a “melted” appearance and everything is nicely rounded without a hint of a sharp edge to be found anywhere. The aluminum G10 grips are like artwork and also fit the pistol incredibly well. The finish is called "dark gray nitration'. I’m not exactly sure what that means, but it looks flawlessly beautiful and is supposedly very durable as well. It looks not unlike a really nice bluing from years past. It’s really impressive. Even the roll marks are done with the utmost care and precision. The slide rides inside the frame like its on ball bearings and it locks up extremely tight, which is not surprising considering the pistol’s accuracy prowess. The slide release is extended and easy to operate. The thumb safety is perfectly weighted with a very positive feel. The beavertail completes the FK’s outstanding ergonomics. The front of the trigger guard and the front strap are both finely serrated. The bottom of the grip frame is flared into a small magwell.

The standard rear sight is called a butterfly, which is very different from anything else I own (see picture). The front sight is a super small red dot. It was designed small to not block targets 200 yards away. As mentioned above, it also ships with a set of 3-dots. The gun’s heft is readily apparent as soon as you pick it up. It weighs 51oz empty, making it one of my heaviest semi autos. Between the large size, the muzzle weight, and its all-steel construction, that’s to be expected. This is welcome for me because I love heavy pistols at the range.

The trigger is good, but not great. The weight is only 3lbs, but there is a slight bit of creep after the take up, which I found disappointing. That being said, the FK wasn’t designed with target shooting as its main objective. Its meant for use in the field. I personally don’t quite get that, but it is what it is. My only other minor complaint is that the serrations on the front strap are so fine that it almost feels smooth. Coupling that with the slick finish and I’d imagine it can be hard to get good traction with sweaty hands. I will say that the serrations are so nicely done that I can get over it and the grip checkering is good.

The proprietary 7.5 FK round is a scorcher. The 95 grain bullet has been chronographed at almost 2100fps. When zeroed at 100 yards, bullet drop is minimal at 200, so it’s a very flat shooting cartridge. Watching some YouTube videos of people testing the round is very entertaining. The performance is incredible and it hits like a ton of bricks. FK will be coming out with some different loadings in the future, but there is only one at this time. At $1.50 per round, it isn’t cheap either. While it looks a lot like the 7.62 Tokarev round in size and shape, it is much, much hotter (as in about double the energy).

My first range session was brief, but the pistol definitely lived up to my expectations. The round is HOT. Saying it produces 900+ ft/lbs of energy doesn’t begin to describe the way it feels to shoot it. The sound and muzzle blast are really awe-inspiring, for the lack of a better term. Recoil itself is not bad, due to the gun’s weight. However, you definitely know you aren’t shooting a typical service caliber either. The power of the round is immediately evident with each trigger pull and the speed at which it hits the dirt berm at 25 yards is instantaneous. I look forward to shooting at some longer distances in the future.

The gun feels extremely solid under fire. Nothing moves, other than the glass-like slide, which you can’t even feel. There is no noise and no rattle whatsoever.

Upon field stripping the gun to clean it, it’s quite evident that this is no CZ or Tanfo. The slide glides inside the frame as smooth as a Sig P210. The attention to detail inside and outside of the entire package is breathtaking. Hell, even the rounds are beautiful to look at between the flawless brass and the high quality bullets.

I do have one MAJOR shooting complaint. The butterfly rear sight just flat out doesn’t work for me. I switched to the 3-dot sight to use going forward.

Other than that, I have nothing bad to say. This pistol feels world class in every way. It’s the real deal. To me, between the immense quality and capability of the gun, coupled with the amazing 7.5FK round, the package is worth the price. It’s unlike anything I’ve shot before and I've shot a lot of very cool handguns.

At any rate, that’s enough babbling. Have any of you had the pleasure of shooting one of these yet? I understand BRNO wants to build 1000 of the Field Pistols and then possibly move on to a 5” model. Whether or not that’s true, I’m not sure. Perhaps the 5” model will be a bit more affordable if and when it does appear. This is one of the first built, at #30.

Please enjoy the pictures. I tried my best to capture the FK's craftsmanship with my camera, but pics don't do it justice.

Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts. :)


dtOw7p.jpg

evXTKo.jpg

H9aGzT.jpg

zAu33v.jpg

CgyG00.jpg

9Cb0b2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Interesting gun and thanks for sharing.

Wish they were more affordable. Prepper Gun Shop had them listed for like $8000 a few months back. They may still be listed there. I'll have to stick with my 10mm if I want a powerful autoloader. That price would be more than I can allocate to shooting and gun buying for an entire year.

That rear sight is interesting. It's like a peep sight on a handgun.

So the gun manufacturer is the only source for the ammo? I wonder if a loading press and dies could be set up to load your own ammo since like you said, it's similar to a Tok. Seems a prudent thing to do as an owner to make sure you have access to ammo, though if you can afford that gun, you can probably afford to buy enough ammo for a lifetime.
 
Last edited:
Nice gun. Short of winning the lottery I'll never own one though.

To me that's one custom BHP, an AR with an ACOG, a Tikka CTR .308 with a nice scope, a PTR-91 and a Ruger .357.
 
They can be had at $7000-$7500.

$8000 was what some were being charged when they first hit the market. I got mine for $7500.
 
That is not a lot for bench assembled & finished limited production "Robocop" gun chambered for proprietory cartridge. The only thing not to like are the phillips head screws holding grip pannels in place.
 
That is a seriously cool gun in an impressive chambering, but is way out of my reach price wise, even at the $7500 mark.
 
I'm not a fan of the grips screws either, but it is what it is.

Not sure why they decided to go that route.
 
I have seen one, didn’t fire it, did handle it.

Honestly not even remotely impressed, particularly for north of $7K. It has build quality at least on the exterior about like a semi custom 1911, I’m just not seeing the value at $7.5K.

The pistol is large and heavy for what it actually brings to the table in terms of performance. A 95gr bullet at 2100fps sounds impressive, until I consider that I can launch a 240gr bullet at 1900fps out of my Freedom Arms .454 Casull that weighs about the same as the BRNO costs a lot less, and has readily available ammunition. Granted one is a single action revolver and the other is a semi-auto pistol, but I don’t see the FK being carried for duty or CCW.

As a rare collectible handgun it may have merits, for any other practical use it’s pretty much useless. No way I’d hunt deer sized game for example with 95gr bullet starting out at 2100fps unless it was within 50 yards and there are better choices than that if your expected shot is inside 50 yards.
 
I have seen one, didn’t fire it, did handle it.

Honestly not even remotely impressed, particularly for north of $7K. It has build quality at least on the exterior about like a semi custom 1911, I’m just not seeing the value at $7.5K.

The pistol is large and heavy for what it actually brings to the table in terms of performance. A 95gr bullet at 2100fps sounds impressive, until I consider that I can launch a 240gr bullet at 1900fps out of my Freedom Arms .454 Casull that weighs about the same as the BRNO costs a lot less, and has readily available ammunition. Granted one is a single action revolver and the other is a semi-auto pistol, but I don’t see the FK being carried for duty or CCW.

As a rare collectible handgun it may have merits, for any other practical use it’s pretty much useless. No way I’d hunt deer sized game for example with 95gr bullet starting out at 2100fps unless it was within 50 yards and there are better choices than that if your expected shot is inside 50 yards.
Well sure, it’s not a practical gun. Never said it was.

However, I like the heavy weight. I have some 9mms that weigh nearly as much. It’s not a carry gun, so I’m not worried about firepower to weight ratio. However, 17 rounds at 900-950 ft/lbs of energy each is no slouch. That’s a ton of firepower and that round does a lot of damage.

I own and have owned dozens of semi custom 1911’s, including a Wilson Super Grade. I also have some full blown custom 1911’s. None of them impress me like this gun. Besides that, it’s just a 1911, so you aren’t paying for any R&D on the gun or the round.

I own multiple Freedom Arms revolvers. They are beautifully made, but a bit apples and oranges, in my opinion.

If you just want firepower, you sure don’t need to spend $3000 on a Freedom Arms. Anyone can go buy a used Ruger Super Redhawk in 454 for cheap and call it a day. Not really the point of high end guns at all, so I’m not sure of your point.

I’m not saying the gun is for everyone. However, it impresses the hell out of me, which is saying something because very, very few new production handguns do.

To each their own of course. I do think the price is steep, so I’m hoping the 5” model is a bit less. Even $5-$6000 would be a welcome reduction. I plan to have one either way.
 
My observation is based only on external examination, and a personal consideration of what use I would have for it.

I don’t mind paying for a premium product that fulfills a use I have. Your comparison of a basic Ruger to my Freedom Arms is spot on, I like nice things and will pay for them if I have a use for them.

The FK unfortunately doesn’t fill any niche capabilities I’m looking for. It’s a solution to a question very very few people have asked, and an expensive solution at that. I suspect that soon it will be an orphaned design and caliber. Get ammo, and brass while you still can.
 
Well sure, it’s not a practical gun. Never said it was.

However, I like the heavy weight. I have some 9mms that weigh nearly as much. It’s not a carry gun, so I’m not worried about firepower to weight ratio. However, 17 rounds at 900-950 ft/lbs of energy each is no slouch. That’s a ton of firepower and that round does a lot of damage.

I own and have owned dozens of semi custom 1911’s, including a Wilson Super Grade. I also have some full blown custom 1911’s. None of them impress me like this gun. Besides that, it’s just a 1911, so you aren’t paying for any R&D on the gun or the round.

I own multiple Freedom Arms revolvers. They are beautifully made, but a bit apples and oranges, in my opinion.

If you just want firepower, you sure don’t need to spend $3000 on a Freedom Arms. Anyone can go buy a used Ruger Super Redhawk in 454 for cheap and call it a day. Not really the point of high end guns at all, so I’m not sure of your point.

I’m not saying the gun is for everyone. However, it impresses the hell out of me, which is saying something because very, very few new production handguns do.

To each their own of course. I do think the price is steep, so I’m hoping the 5” model is a bit less. Even $5-$6000 would be a welcome reduction. I plan to have one either way.
Hey, its only money. If it brings you joy in its lines, polish, shooting dynamics, or just for the sake of owning a bespoke example of gun making, then it is well worth the price.

I get it- no haterade here bro. Beautiful gun.:thumbup:

You know, if you write FK, I'll bet they would send you some nice Allen head screws for the grips.
 
I was unfamiliar with the pistol and cartridge. Thanks for introducing both to me. That is a very sexy firearm. Enjoy!
 
Here's Tim from the Military Arms Channel doing a review of this pistol:


As the OP stated, it looks interesting and the workmanship is first rate, but at the price, most of us can only dream.

I'm looking forward to the torture test video where he throws it up in the air and whips a $7500 gun at a steel target, and then acts surprised if it breaks or malfunctions.
 
Here's Tim from the Military Arms Channel doing a review of this pistol:


As the OP stated, it looks interesting and the workmanship is first rate, but at the price, most of us can only dream.


Thanks for sharing that video, I dont watch MAC all that often but it was a good one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top