RAY WOODROW 3RD
Member
For the New Jersey people out there.......
How a gunowner in NJ should respond: (my personal opinion)
Officer: Are there any drugs or firearms in the vehicle I should know about?
N.J. resident: No officer there are no drugs or ILLEGAL firearms in the vehicle.
Officer: May I search the vehicle?
N.J. resident: No sir. I do not consent to a search.
Reason:
All my firearms are legally owned and legally carried to and from the range. I will not give any information that will allow the officer to go on a "discovery hunt" thru my vehicle. I feel it is not the officer's business if they are legally transported, owned, and he cannot see them because they are cased and covered. He should not be worried about it. If he is pulling me over for another reason besides a traffic stop, he will find the cased guns soon enough. The mention of guns in this state is a NO, NO.
In the State of New Jersey, as soon as I say, "Yes officer they are in the back cased" to the gun question, I feel that I would be taken out of my vehicle, handcuffed, possibly arrested just for having the balls to own firearms, and my stuff taken into custody/destroyed. How is that for the feeling that police give to the adverage law abiding citizen!
(yea, I can fight to get them back in court but I do not have the tons of money it would take to do so and neither do many other NJ residents.)
There is an anti-gun mentality in a good portion of the police in this state. (Kind of sounds like the SF area doesn't it?) Not all police but a good majority. When dealing with firearms, the less information you give them the better off you will be. At least in this state.
(again, just my personal opinion.)
How a gunowner in NJ should respond: (my personal opinion)
Officer: Are there any drugs or firearms in the vehicle I should know about?
N.J. resident: No officer there are no drugs or ILLEGAL firearms in the vehicle.
Officer: May I search the vehicle?
N.J. resident: No sir. I do not consent to a search.
Reason:
All my firearms are legally owned and legally carried to and from the range. I will not give any information that will allow the officer to go on a "discovery hunt" thru my vehicle. I feel it is not the officer's business if they are legally transported, owned, and he cannot see them because they are cased and covered. He should not be worried about it. If he is pulling me over for another reason besides a traffic stop, he will find the cased guns soon enough. The mention of guns in this state is a NO, NO.
In the State of New Jersey, as soon as I say, "Yes officer they are in the back cased" to the gun question, I feel that I would be taken out of my vehicle, handcuffed, possibly arrested just for having the balls to own firearms, and my stuff taken into custody/destroyed. How is that for the feeling that police give to the adverage law abiding citizen!
(yea, I can fight to get them back in court but I do not have the tons of money it would take to do so and neither do many other NJ residents.)
There is an anti-gun mentality in a good portion of the police in this state. (Kind of sounds like the SF area doesn't it?) Not all police but a good majority. When dealing with firearms, the less information you give them the better off you will be. At least in this state.
(again, just my personal opinion.)