I have to ask: is there actually a major advantage of the dual recoil spring set-up of the gen4 series versus the single spring of previous generations if they are equal in strength/power rating (i.e. aftermarket springs for gen 3's equaling the power of gen 4 spring assemblies)? Perhaps a dual spring assembly would not wear out as quickly and perhaps the widened diameter of the gen 4 spring assembly would help reduce felt recoil, but then again it could just be a gimmick...especially considering the options of increasing spring strength of gen 3's with more stout aftermarket springs.
It just seems like an obvious question. It's been a great while since I took physics, but I am having a hard time explaining the advantages of Glock's new Gen 4 dual assembly compared to single (aftermarket) springs of the same overall strength. Can you help me?
It just seems like an obvious question. It's been a great while since I took physics, but I am having a hard time explaining the advantages of Glock's new Gen 4 dual assembly compared to single (aftermarket) springs of the same overall strength. Can you help me?