GOA: 2004 Election Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
2004 Election Report
-- Guns a major factor in races all across the nation

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

November 5, 2004


The 2004 election might be remembered as "The Year of the Gun Owner."

Presidential candidate John Kerry, a liberal anti-gun Senator from
Massachusetts, tried to morph himself into 'The Hunter.' Rarely a
day passed during the latter part of the campaign without Kerry
posing with a firearm and speaking about his strong support of the
Second Amendment, in complete contradiction to his 20-year anti-gun
voting record.

Kerry was not alone. All across the country, anti-gun politicians
tried to hide behind gun-friendly photo ops and empty rhetoric about
how much they support gun rights.

Gun Owners of America, through its candidate rating program and
political action committee, was able to expose much anti-gun
duplicity this year, and the results were extremely heartening.

Of course, the obstructionist anti-gun Senate Minority Leader, Tom
Daschle, is finally deposed. Replacing him is former Representative
John Thune, a strong pro-gun ally supported by Gun Owners of America
-- Political Victory Fund (GOA-PVF).

But while ousting Daschle was certainly one of the most crucial races
this year, there were six open Senate seats that anti-gunners had
their sights set on. GOA-PVF played an important role in thwarting
that plan and helping to elect strong pro-gun advocates to five of
the six open seats.


Louisiana: Anti-gun to Pro-gun

In Louisiana, pro-gun Rep. David Vitter shocked pundits by winning
this senate race outright. In that state, all candidates, regardless
of party, are placed on the November ballot. If no candidate were to
break the 50% mark, the top two vote getters would head into a
December runoff election.

Both major candidates, Vitter and Rep. Chris John (D), claimed to be
pro-gun. Rep. John, though, had voted against arming commercial
airline pilots and for the unconstitutional campaign finance reform
law, earning him a "C" grade by GOA as opposed to David Vitter's
solid "A" rating.

GOA-PVF was the ONLY national gun rights group to jump into the race,
contacting thousands of Second Amendment supporters highlighting the
differences between the candidates. At the end of the night, Vitter
had 51% of the vote and is now the Senator-elect. He replaces
retiring anti-gun "F" rated Senator John Breaux (D).


Oklahoma: Moderately Pro-gun to Very Pro-gun

One of the most exciting races of Election Day was the one to replace
retiring Senator Don Nickles (R). Running were former Representative
Dr. Tom Coburn and current Rep. Brad Carson.

Guns were a blazing issue right up to the end.

On Friday before the election, GOA got a call from Sen. Jim Inhofe,
the senior senator from Okalahoma. He was in a campaign bus
somewhere in the state, and he was upset. Coburn's opponent had sent
out a large postcard claiming that he was the real pro-Second
Amendment candidate in the race. In addition, the mailing alleged
the Coburn was not really pro-gun.

GOA immediately faxed the campaign a letter labeling the hit piece a
deception and reiterating our endorsement of Coburn, who was a solid
"A" with us (his opponent was a "B"). Moreover, Coburn's leadership
and integrity would have made him the pick even if their voting
records had been identical.

GOA-PVF was the ONLY national gun rights group to make an endorsement
in this race, helping Dr. Coburn to victory with 53% of the vote.

And this in the face of being outspent nearly two to one in a state
with a Democrat registration advantage of two to one. The Republican
establishment did not support Coburn, who is known as a "Dr. No" who
opposes their pork projects.


Pro-gun Candidates Win Open Senate Seats in the Southeast

Other races where GOA-PVF played a role were equally significant:

* The Senate seat in North Carolina was that of vice-presidential
nominee John Edwards, a trial lawyer who earlier this year took a
rare break from the campaign to come to Washington to help sink a
bill designed to protect gun makers from frivolous lawsuits. Running
to fill this seat were pro-gun U.S. House member Richard Burr and
former Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton, Erskine Bowles.
GOA-PVF supported Rep. Burr, who won with 52% of the vote.

* In South Carolina, pro-gun House member Jim DeMint faced off
against Inez Tenenbaum, State Superintendent of Education. Tenenbaum
had the advantage of having won statewide office in 1998 and 2002,
while Rep. DeMint was widely unknown outside of his congressional
district. Rep. DeMint is a man of principle who clearly articulated
his positions and stood by them. Tenenbaum, on the other hand,
refused to make her Second Amendment positions known. Rep. DeMint,
endorsed and supported by GOA-PVF, won with 54% of the vote.

* In the Sunshine State, a former cabinet member for President George
W. Bush, Mel Martinez, faced a formidable foe in anti-gun former
state senator and Florida Commissioner of Education, Betty Castor.
Martinez, though a trial lawyer himself, is an outspoken opponent of
the frivolous lawsuits brought by many cities and states against the
gun industry. Martinez, who replaces retiring anti-gun Sen. Bob
Graham, narrowly won this race with 50% of the vote.


Huge Victory in Colorado

All together, GOA-PVF helped 14 pro-gun challengers get elected in
the House and Senate. GOA's general policy is to restrict our
support to challengers, since incumbents have obvious advantages in
raising money and name ID.

This is why GOA's Executive Director put out a PERSONAL appeal for
incumbent Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO), who was combating a million
dollar TV campaign that attacked her incessantly. Happily, Musgrave
was able to raise $3 million, and she won her race with 51% of the
vote.

Musgrave has been a leader on a whole host of conservative issues,
including gun rights. She was the founder of the Second Amendment
Caucus in Congress and has sponsored and cosponsored numerous pro-gun
bills.

People in Musgrave's district have certainly appreciated her
willingness to fight the Republican establishment in the nation's
capital, just as she fought it in Denver as a state legislator.

GOA-PVF was involved in other House and Senate races. To get the
full report, become a GOA member at www.gunowners.org/ordergoamem.htm
-- this will start your subscription to The Gun Owners newsletter,
which will keep you up-to-date on what's happening with your gun
rights.


The Road Ahead

There is no question that gun owners made significant gains in the
2004 elections. There is the question, however, of what will be done
with these gains.

The ultimate objective is not merely to elect good people; we must
also work to restore lost ground. Consider just a few examples of
gun rights we have lost over the past few decades:

* The 1968 Gun Control Act instituted, among other things, the
blatantly unconstitutional "sporting purposes" test, which stipulates
that imported firearms must be "particularly suitable for or readily
adaptable to sporting purposes."

* Since 1976, the District of Columbia has been under a near total
gun ban. The House voted this year to repeal the ban, but it died in
the Senate.

* In 1986, the Congress banned the manufacture of machine guns for
non-military and law enforcement. Anti-gunners use the argument the
authors of the Constitution never envisioned full autos when they
wrote the Second Amendment. Well, they probably never thought about
radio, television and the Internet, either. Yet, no one would argue
the First Amendment does not protect these.

* In 1993, the Congress passed the Brady background registration
check. Now, citizens must go to the FBI to get permission to buy a
firearm. This is nothing less than turning our Second Amendment
"right" into a mere "privilege." Supporters of the law try to make
it more palatable by pointing out that it is "instant" and hardly an
inconvenience, as if expediency makes losing liberty acceptable.

* In 1996, the Congress passed the gun free zones law (prohibiting
firearms within 1,000 feet of any school property) and the
misdemeanor gun ban (lifetime gun ban for certain misdemeanor
convictions).

These are just some of the unconstitutional laws GOA would like to
repeal. GOA will also continue push for implementation of the armed
pilots program and to pass a lawsuit protection bill for the firearms
industry.

It is an ambitious agenda. How far we are able to move the ball in
our direction, however, depends entirely on the GOA membership. Many
gun owners mistakenly believe the battle is won in the election.
That is only half the battle. The harder work still lies before us.

Gun owners must stay engaged in the battle by calling, writing, and
e-mailing elected officials, urging them to roll back
unconstitutional gun laws. And we need you to stand with us.

Renew your GOA membership today at www.gunowners.org/ordergoamem.htm
-- and work together with the organization that Rep. Ron Paul calls
the "only no compromise gun lobby in Washington."
 
The GOA is being a bit optimistic. See the NRA mass-email for another point of view. Any group being paid to support gun rights should be overly optimistic, because that's the only way to get useful compromises, and a positive attitude is infectious.

Yet another reason the GOA is a better organization that the NRA.
 
yep, me too


edit:

so I just went to GOA's site to sign up, and apparently if you get a life membership for $500, you get a 2-day class at front site. I'd feel good giving the $500 for a life membership without the class, knowing my money is going to pay off pro-gun politicians... but is this class worth it?

I guess what I'm really asking is... is the class worth burning a week of vacation and the drive from TN to wherevertheheck front site is?
 
A double tap. If not on target it is down range.

Pre-emption
I read somewhere about pushing for a federal pre-emption. If it was worded correctly and included some explanation referring to "reform to repair a uniformly unconstitutional assault on individual rights"!
The more constitutional legislators could beat the socialists over the head with this from every corner. Scotus might kick and scream at the thought. Every legislator could find themselves constantly reminded of the oath they and so many of us here have taken.

One bill titled as such containing other repairs and clarifications as clean up efforts of so many other muddy clear rules laws and such. How would these senators look voting against medical and other professional tort reforms Or real teeth in arming pilots now.

Just another random thought. Something if written correctly and acted upon could pave the way to 2A relief.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top