Gonna buy my first handgun (trying to decide between P22 and Ruger 22/45 etc)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
19
Location
WessiiiiIIIIIiiiide
Hey guys.

Ok so basically, I used to shoot on a regular basis (usually once a week, for about a year and a half when I was about 11 years old (I went to the range with my Dad)). My dad only owned rifles though. No shotguns or pistols. We never went hunting, as neither of us were into the violent aspects of shooting, we only enjoyed target shooting, for marksmanship, because we enjoyed the simple fun of trying to aim really well and shoot more and more accurately with practice (much like people who go bowling enjoy getting more and more accurate at bowling as they practice, or people who play golf, etc). I was almost exactly as good as my father at rifle target shooting. We both shot with a .22 rimfire, and we both shot prone, with a sling (no sandbags or gun-rests or anything like that, as that would take all the fun/skill out of it, as you would no longer have to hold the gun steady if it was just sitting resting on something or whatever). I generally shot from a 50 foot distance to the target, and I had quite a few very good sets (I used aperture sites btw, no scope and shot at small I think it was 2 inch diamater targets). I think my best set of 10 ever was getting all 10 on the target, with like 5 shots inside the size of a U.S. quarter, and 3 shots within the size of a U.S. dime, and 2 through the same hole (it looked like an oval lol)). So anyway, I'm not exactly a novice to shooting or anything, and I was actually a pretty good shot. I think I got to the rank of Sharpshooter Bar-1 before I quit shooting, but probably could have gone all the way up to Distinguished Expert if I had stuck with it, though I became bored with it once I was 12 and entered Junior High and got more into playing video games with my friends, and playing sports etc.

However, since we only owned a .22 rimfire rifle, and a .22 centerfire rifle (this was our "toy" that we only shot 5 or 10 rounds with at the end of the day every so often more for amusement than anything (it was a custom built Anschutz that my dad made, with a special barrel with looser than normal rifling so that he could shoot these ultra rare low grain bullets that he put into cartridges that he loaded by hand (it was one bad as motherf***er of a rifle, shooting at, I kid you not, nearly 6,000 feet per second lol) the only times I ever got to shoot shotgun or pistol was when some random person at therange was friendly enough to let me try out his shotgun or pistol. So I only shot shotgun like 2 or 3 times ever, and I think pistol maybe 8 or 9 times. Probably 3 or 4 times I shot revolver, and 4 or 5 times I shot semi-auto. So I have shot less than 100 rounds of handgun in my lifetime, and it was about 11 years ago too...

Anyway,

My father has since passed away, but I found out that some of my best friends from high school are now heavily into target shooting, to my surprise (they didn't care for it at all when I knew them in junior high and high school). Apparently they don't shoot rifles though, only shotgun and pistol.

Personally I actually enjoyed pistol shooting the most, more even than rifle shooting, although I was a total novice on pistols, but I just thought it was the most fun form of shooting, though less pure of a marksmanship sport than rifle shooting I suppose, but more fun overall.

So now I want to buy my first pistol, so I can go out to the range with my friends and blast through a bunch of ammo while i learn how to get half decent on the pistol.

I do not however want to spend a bunch of money on the gun, and more importantly I DEFINITELY do not want to spend much money on the ammo. This is why I don't want to buy some big expensive pistol or anything for my first gun. I want a small, light, easy for beginners, .22 rimfire shooting pistol that is cheap, and can shoot cheap bullets, and won't break or need me to be very knowledgeable about pistols etc. Just something fun and easy to start out with while I blow through my first few thousand rounds.

After I've become decent on the pistol, I'll upgrade to something a lot nicer and more accurate etc, but I don't want that for my first gun.

Anyway, so from what I've seen, the two most talked about .22 caliber semi-autos that shoot cheap .22lr ammo seem to be:

1. The Walther P22

and

2. The Ruger mk3/ mk3-22/45

From what I've seen, in my very brief investigating:

The P22:

- Is lightweight

- Sexy looking

- Easier to take apart and put back together than the Ruger

- Is prone to having lots of FTF and FTE problems, particularly on low quality bulk ammo. (although I've heard that if you use CCI Mini Mags in them, they work just fine, and can even be "broken in" to where you can pump cheapo federal bricks through them afterwards?)

- Is fairly innacurate, even with the 5" barrel model


The Ruger:

- Is heavier (than the P22)

- Is ugly looking

- Is a major pain in the ass to take apart and put back together

- Is very well made and never breaks

- Is less finicky about crappy cheap bulk ammo (is this true?) in terms of FTF or FTE problems than the P22



Personally, I'm one of the few people who actually prefers a lighter weight gun to a heavier gun, so this edges me more towards the P22.

However, I am a bit disgruntled about stories of the P22 FTF or FTE'ing like 1 time ever 10 shots or something absurd, and having less accuracy than a coked-out Haitian spraying freehand in a drug war shootout with a freaking uzi or something.

So although most people tell me to go with the Ruger, I guess I am still on the fence.

So, here's what I'd like to hear from you guys:

1. What are your opinions on the Walther P22?

2. What are your opinons on the Ruger mk3 and mk3-22/45?

3. What are your opinons on any other .22lr semi-autos other than those above mentioned guns (are any of them even better that I'm overlooking?)

4. Would there be any sense in buyin a revolver if it is going to be my first pistol, and I'm going to be shooting .22lrs, and I don't want my gun to weigh too much? Are all revolvers, big, heavvy, expensive, and hard to learn on for a pistol-novice, or am I just being ignorant? etc

Ok, thanks in advance!

Ready go!
 
also

Just out of curiosity...

The P22 says it has a 10 round capacity, whereas the Ruger says it has a 10+1 round capacity (the +1 being 1 in the chamber). I don't know much about semi-auto handguns. Can someone explain why they would write it like this?

Does it mean that you load 11 rounds into the magazine, and then when you pop it into the Ruger, the top round automatically slides into the chamber upon the magazine being put into the gun? Does it mean that you put 11 rounds into the magazine, and then once you put the mag into the Ruger, it loads the top round in if you pull the slide back to load it into the chamber? Does it mean that you are supposed to put 10 rounds into the mag and then pull the slide back, and manually insert the 11th round into the chamber, before you pop the mag in? I have no idea, can someone explain why it is a 10+1 instead of an 11? How does it work/what does it mean?

Thanks
 
10 + 1 means you load a ten round mag. Insert it in the gun, chamber a round, drop the mag and insert another round, reinsert the mag. 10 + 1.

I have a Ruger 22/45. It's a neat pistol and I love to shoot it. You don't have to take it apart very often, if at all.

BTW, no .22 ever went 6000 FPS.
 
10+1 just means ten in the magazine and one in the chamber. Pop in a loaded mag, hit the slide release to load the top round, put it on safe, drop the mag, top off the mag, and re-insert.

Edit: NC-Mike beat me to it, I guess I shouldn't go to the kitchen in the middle of typing a post!


I like the ergonomics and "cuteness" of the P22 a lot, and I have a friend who has one, the 5" barreled version, and it's an accurate little gun. My friend uses Federal bricks and doesn't have any problems, but says that takedown is a PITA. Oh well, no free lunch. I've heard people say that they are just crap, some say they are great, and many are somewhere in-between. YMMV. I have no experience with the Ruger but between the two I would take the Walther P22, I just like the ergonomics so much. When I turn 21 I will most likely be buying one along with a 1911.
 
If you get the Ruger 22/45, take a course in mechanical engineering, you will need it to field strip and put back together.
Floydster
 
22/45 hands down IMO.

I didn't find takedown to be nearly as bad as everyone claims. I just read a little bit over on RFC, and went at it. That being said, the last time I took the gun apart was to add some VQ parts; since then (well over a year) I just hose the gun down with CLP and rock on.

I've had three P22's, and have several friends with them. I couldn't get any of them to run right, the plastic front sight has flown off one of mine, and the trigger/ergos are crap compared to the Ruger autos.
 
Ok, I see what the 10+1 means now.

However I'm curious:

If I don't want to go through the hassle of putting the mag in, and taking it back out, and putting it back in again each time, as this could get kind of annoying, can I just put 10 rounds in the mag or something and not have to do all this chambering and dropping and putting mag back in stuff all the time, or do I HAVE to do this every time?

Also:

To NC,

The .22 that my dad created that was shooting bullets at over 5,000 fps was a centerfire rifle. Also not sure if I should have said ".22" I think maybe I should have said .223 or .224 or whatever it is that the badboy 22s are supposed to be called, I can't remember. All I know is that he had to buy literally about a dozen books and talk to a lot of gun experts to manage to put together a custom rifle that was able to fire bullets at the speed his rifle could. This is seriously one monstrous frankenstein of a rifle. I am guessing it would go for a rather large of money if I were to sell it on ebay, as it really was shooting WELL OVER 5,000 FPS (not 6,000 fps though, just somewhere inbetween 5,000 and 6,000 which is still ungodly fast). So yea, its true that no normal stock .22 is shooting anywhere NEAR that speed, but this was no normal gun. It is a one of a kind rifle. You would probably have to see it to believe it.
 
If I don't want to go through the hassle of putting the mag in, and taking it back out, and putting it back in again each time, as this could get kind of annoying, can I just put 10 rounds in the mag or something and not have to do all this chambering and dropping and putting mag back in stuff all the time, or do I HAVE to do this every time?

You don't HAVE to put the extra round in the chamber. It's just a way of getting one more shot off before having to reload.
 
Between those two, the Ruger hands down.

I would like more info on the rifle that allegedly shoots over 5000fps. Velocities around 5000fps are not completely impossible but require pretty insane design features and I'm highly skeptical that it was achieved with a .223 type cartridge, though if you show me a .50 BMG case necked down to .223 I might be slightly less skeptical. I don't think 6000fps is even possible at 65,000psi pressure levels.
 
Being a Mark III owner and having to deal with the regular take down and clean up, I would lean towards looking at a different gun altogether. Look into a Browning Buck Mark. I've heard they're easier to fieldstrip and clean than the Mark III. You should also be able to pick one up for about $205-215 new. Course this is the entry level version--just like the Ruger 22/45.

Personally, would stay away completely from the Walthier P22. You'll definitely regret it. THe Ruger is well made, accurate and will last a lifetime...BUT it is a pain in the rear end to clean up. Actually only one part is a pain in the rear and that's getting the pin into place at the end. However, once you've accomplished this part the whole cleaning goes pretty easy.
 
can someone explain why it is a 10+1 instead of an 11

"10+1" is a relic of the days of the old AWB. Your new gun, could not come with a new magazine that held more than 10 rounds. But, you could take the 10 rounder, insert it, chamber one round, then eject it and put another round in it. Hence "10+1". Stupid, isn't it?
 
I looked at the Browning Buckmark one time. IIRC you must remove any scope you've mounted in order to do any field stripping of any kind. I view that as a serious disadvantage, since I would be planning to put a red dot on it. If you're going to use the irons, it shouldn't matter.
 
The MkIII 22/45 isn't as bad to take apart as everyone says. If you can read instructions well enough to build a model airplane, then you are qualified to clean a Ruger.

That said, mine is at 13k+ rounds, with under a dozen cleanings.
 
I chose to buy a bore snake for my Mark III. I may choose to learn to take it apart or I may take it back to the shop once or twice a year to use their reasonably-priced Ruger-cleaning service.
 
A crap POS vs one of finest .22 pistols ever made-----hhhhhhhmmmmm let me see............

















Get the Ruger--in case you didn't figure it out already.

If you have opposable thumbs you can take it apart and put it back together with little problem.:banghead:
 
Get the one that feels best. My take on the models I own and shoot regularly.

Accuracy and reliability: S&W 22A, Ruger MKII/III, Browning Buck Mark. All are about equal.

Materials of construction: Steel Rugers, Buck Mark, 22/45 and 22A. I'd down grade the 22/45 because the polymer grip frame won't last as long as steel. The 22A is an aluminum alloy. That being said, my 22A has about 15k rounds and shows no wear whatsoever. Don't use them as hammers and they will last a very long time.

Reliability: 22A, Ruger, Buck Mark are equal.

Accuracy or ability to shoot accurately: 22A, Ruger, Buck Mark are about equal. I think the shooter makes more difference in accuracy.

Ability to upgrade or tweak: Ruger, Ruger, Buck Mark,,,,,22A (you can change barrels and grips on the 22A, that's about it.

Field Strip Ease: 22A (slide back, press the take-down button and remove the barrel). Ruger, then Buck Mark. Guys, I hate removing the screws on the site base. I'm waiting for may degree in mechanical engineering. Rugers are pretty simple to field strip if you follow the directions. Do it regularly. NBD.

Cute, light, sexy: P22 is in a class by itself.

The P22 is notch below the rest in materials of construction (zinc alloy slide, plastic sights) and manufacturing. It won't last as long as the others, but will last a long time if you are willing to totally disassemble it and do some serious polishing so it won't eat itself.

If I were making a decision between the MKIII 22/45 and the P22 for a target pistol, the Ruger would win without a thought.
 
Between the Ruger 22/45 and the Walther P22 I would choose the 22/45.
There are tools available that assist in field stripping and they really aren't that hard to do once you have actually taken them down three or four times.

I have been on the lookout for a 4" standard barrel 22/45 Mkll for some time.
One day I will get lucky and find one for sale.

I owned a P22 with both barrel assemblies and the gun caused nothing but problems from spotty reliability to really disappointing accuracy.
I sold mine and bought a Manhurin made Walther PP in .22LR to replace it.
A much better pistol in this caliber.
 
question about cleaning

Back when I used to target shoot with our .22 rimfire, I made a habit of cleaning my gun at the end of the session day at the range of cleaning my gun (they had a gun cleaning table at the range I used to go to, so I just took my gun to the table and cleaned it there). It was very easy and simple. I used a bolt action rimfire rifle, so all I had to do was pop the bolt out, and brush it clean with a brush, and then stick one of those tiny little square shaped cotton thingies onto the end of a long narrow wire rod, and push it through the barrel, and do that a few times until there wasn't a bunch of lead/gunk on the swabs after I ran it through the barrel. It was very simple, quick and easy, and I did it after every shooting session.

However I've never cleaned a handgun before, as I've never owned one, and only fired a few rounds on other people's guns back when I was at the range every so often, so I know nothing about it.

What's the deal?

Are you supposed to clean the gun after every session? If I use CCI Mini Mags instead of cheapo federal brick bulk lead, will I not need to clean my pistol nearly as often? Would I need to clean the Ruger less often than the P22? How often would I need to clean either of them? Do I have to take the pistol apart in order to clean it?

Any info on this would be useful, and might sway my decision on which handgun to buy, because I don't want to waste much time dealing with cleaning a handgun if its all neurosurgery style or something after each session and takes me the whole freaaking afternoon to clean it or something just because I went down to the range earlier that day.

So, what should I know, as far as this goes?
 
So, what should I know, as far as this goes?

Several people have already commented on that...

And no, you don't have to field strip the pistol every time you shoot it. If you are so inclined to do so, you certainly may.
 
Ruger. Read the manual when you are field stripping. There's one trick and its easy.

The 22/45 with four inch barrel is not that heavy.
 
If you get the Ruger 22/45, take a course in mechanical engineering, you will need it to field strip and put back together.
Floydster

...or, you could just read the manual...
 
You really shouldn't have to clean a .22 too often. I clean mine when the spirit moves me which is somewhere between 500 and 1500 rounds. I use a bore snake or wet patch on the barrel and Breakfree CLP for the other parts.

This link is better than the manual for field stripping http://www.guntalk-online.com/fsprocedures.htm

As far as ease of disassembly, this is farther than you will ever want to go unless you want to replace the trigger and sear, which for me was about a 20-minute job. And I'm the original twelve-thumbed klutz.
DSC00394.gif
DSC00395.gif
 
thanks for the link

also, I know for the P22 everyone was saying that I needed to break it in with CCI mini mags, so do I need to do the same thing for the ruger? Or can I start off right off the bat feeding it the cheap crap? Do they really eat anything right out of the box? Or should I break it in with some hotter stuff before I downgrade to the feds?

Also, can I get away with pumping like 3,000+ rounds without cleaning it if I stick to cci mini mags instead of dirty cheapo lead, since the mini mags I think leave a lot less gunk in the barrel, or not really?
 
I have a P22 that's been very reliable. The gun itself is accurate, the sights aren't exactly target sights though. Mine has never flung pieces off, stopped working, or cracked a slide. I like it for just plinking away and introducing new shooters to the sport. It looks like a large center fire pistol and the controls are all similar (save the slide safety). I started off with mini-mags but quickly switched to bulk ammo to save more money, and it works fine with those. It regularly goes 500-1000 rounds between cleanings and doesn't seem to care. It certainly is dirty after 1000 rounds though! :p I guess it's somewhere between 8k-9k rounds now with no issues aside from the occasional bulk round dud. :)

If I were to get another 22LR I'd probably go for a 22/45 Hunter with the hi-viz sight and ~7" barrel, for the accuracy. If I didn't have a 22LR and was only going to get one, I'd probably flip a coin. I've really enjoyed my P22 and I've introduced nearly a dozen new shooters on it, and they all seemed to like it as well. I've seen another half dozen owned by various shooters I've known, and they all like them as well. While I'm sure the ones that refuse to work well exist, I haven't personally seen them. Pick your poison. :D
 
I've got a P22 and a MKII, and the MKII would b my choice. Sights, Accuracy, reliability, trigger, modifications are all far superior...the only downside is the take-down, and the weight.

Have you considered a revolver. They are very simple to operate for someone new to handguns.

And even though this is a autoloader forum, Check out the S&W 63, 317 kit gun, or a 617, but more $$
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top