Little take up in the trigger before it breaksThat's a nice looking one right there, don't know what you mean by "creep"
I have a Security Six, SP101 and a Super Redhawk no creep in those. But those were also not NIB when I bought them. So who knows if they were cleaned up. Its not a huge deal, Im going to enjoy the heck outta this gun. To me it just appears the tolerances are slightly off. The machining in this revolver isn't anything to brag about, the outside is pretty but inside burs and rough spots that IMHO should be cleaned up before its shipped out. My fault for not looking it over better. This is the 7 shot and its right up there with S&W prices so this better be a one off for Ruger's sake because people aren't going to pay that once if this is the regular.Now I understand what you are referring to. Now I have to go check mine, I don't remember having a creep, but now I have to check.
It’s not uncommon for ruger not to polish up parts that don’t need to be, that’s part of the reason they don’t cost as much as a Smith & Wesson, that’s said I’ve heard tons of stories on here about recent production Smiths not working right out of the box.I have a Security Six, SP101 and a Super Redhawk no creep in those. But those were also not NIB when I bought them. So who knows if they were cleaned up. Its not a huge deal, Im going to enjoy the heck outta this gun. To me it just appears the tolerances are slightly off. The machining in this revolver isn't anything to brag about, the outside is pretty but inside burs and rough spots that IMHO should be cleaned up before its shipped out. My fault for not looking it over better. This is the 7 shot and its right up there with S&W prices so this better be a one off for Ruger's sake because people aren't going to pay that once if this is the regular.
I understand what you are saying but this 7 shot GP100 is spitting distance in price to the S&W similar offering. and its not that parts weren't "polished" there were burs and slag. And the icing was they forgot to put the little take down pin in the handle. I know its a penny worth of steel and I snipped a finishing nail to take its place any how. But its the attention in QC that will hurt the companies rep. Here's my one story of simple QC issues hopefully more don't surface. I hope they didn't also acquire Marlins production issues with the company.It’s not uncommon for ruger not to polish up parts that don’t need to be, that’s part of the reason they don’t cost as much as a Smith & Wesson, that’s said I’ve heard tons of stories on here about recent production Smiths not working right out of the box.
it looks like the hammer and trigger weren't mated well at the factory the more I read I believe is my conclusion. possible shims could fix this issue?If you know what you are doing, you can fix it with careful stoning. It's pretty easy to screw it up though.
Yeah, that's pretty standard....its not that parts weren't "polished" there were burs and slag.
Shims will reduce friction a little by keeping the hammer from touching the sides of the hammer channel during the DA trigger pull. They won't affect the hammer/sear engagement surfaces.possible shims could fix this issue?
I don't think they forgot, I just think they stopped doing it sometime back.And the icing was they forgot to put the little take down pin in the handle.
I believe they stopped that when they started using the finger groove gripsAnd the icing was they forgot to put the little take down pin in the handle
I have one just a few weeks old and I at least didn't notice having one either when I took the grips off the other day back.I believe they stopped that when they started using the finger groove grips