guys,
By way of introduction, I have been involved in IDPA ( club officer level) for the past few years (1998) and have organized the Utah Defensive Pistol League's (IDPA affiliate) non-sanctioned, of course 3 gun match branch. We had 5 matches last year that I was match director, and this year Larry Correia is on board as asst match director.
So I hear now and again that IDPA is just as "non-real" as IPSC and other stuff that tends to raise the back of my neck hair just a bit, I would like to say that the two IDPA clubs that I have been involved with have been real good at putting on tactically correct matches. I feel that if you want to go to an IDPA match and have the outlook of a martial artist, then you have a venue to do that, and if it is more like a game, then you can go and have a good time too.
The main problem from a match-organizational level is that if you wanted to stay "tactically correct" at an IDPA match, then you would have 4-5 stages, one or two targets at each one, and you would probably have 15 total match rounds shot, because after all, the real life encounter would be an ave. of 1-3 shots fired total.(per gunfight-FBI stats) Now, I could guarantee if i showed up at a match and shot 15 rounds, I wouldn't come back, so there has to be a little bit more out there for even the martial artist type of guy ( which is the category I feel more comfortable in).
So my question is founded from the motivation that I want to ensure IDPA stays real as possible, and that is, what do you guys want to see happen at a match that keeps the match "real" as possible? What pisses you off, what do you like?
Thanks,
John L
By way of introduction, I have been involved in IDPA ( club officer level) for the past few years (1998) and have organized the Utah Defensive Pistol League's (IDPA affiliate) non-sanctioned, of course 3 gun match branch. We had 5 matches last year that I was match director, and this year Larry Correia is on board as asst match director.
So I hear now and again that IDPA is just as "non-real" as IPSC and other stuff that tends to raise the back of my neck hair just a bit, I would like to say that the two IDPA clubs that I have been involved with have been real good at putting on tactically correct matches. I feel that if you want to go to an IDPA match and have the outlook of a martial artist, then you have a venue to do that, and if it is more like a game, then you can go and have a good time too.
The main problem from a match-organizational level is that if you wanted to stay "tactically correct" at an IDPA match, then you would have 4-5 stages, one or two targets at each one, and you would probably have 15 total match rounds shot, because after all, the real life encounter would be an ave. of 1-3 shots fired total.(per gunfight-FBI stats) Now, I could guarantee if i showed up at a match and shot 15 rounds, I wouldn't come back, so there has to be a little bit more out there for even the martial artist type of guy ( which is the category I feel more comfortable in).
So my question is founded from the motivation that I want to ensure IDPA stays real as possible, and that is, what do you guys want to see happen at a match that keeps the match "real" as possible? What pisses you off, what do you like?
Thanks,
John L