How many are willing to test that opinion in real life? I am not trying to threaten anybody. I just bet that many of those who say the PG is a BS SD setup would never challenge that situation if confronted with it in real life, thus discreditting their opinion that it is not a reliable form of self defense.
Are you really willing to settle for such a poor argument? No one here is going to break into your house (as you yourself said, "illegally") whether you're armed with an RPG-7 or a dirty look and an unkind word. Claiming that these contributors' suggestions are irrelevant because they won't go to great expense, great inconvenience, and some level of risk of injury (however slight
), to BREAK THE LAW, is so short-sighted as to appear deliberately daft. As I gently alluded to before, no one here cares quite THAT much about your safety as to perform this service for you.
Obviously a shotgun, even a .410 bore single-shot with no stock and a bent barrel, can inflict an uncomfortable, life-threatening, or even lethal wound. Even if fired by a man in his pajamas lying on his back, firing between his feet from his waterbed, after being rudely roused from a deep sleep!
That doesn't make such a set-up a wise idea. If it's all you've got, it's better than a paper cut or bad breath to scare off an attacker. If your PGO is all you've got, make do with it until you can improve your gear. But don't fool yourself into thinking it is nearly as effective as a slightly improved weapon would be.
If you come to a site peopled by knowledgeable, experienced, well-trained, and deeply studied practitioners of various forms of armed self-defense and you ask, "what's the best way?" Why do you argue when you're handed the answer? If you just wanted confirmation that you had it all figured out, you could have asked the mirror.
-Sam