rogerjames
member
Hey guys... Sam, Justin, oneounce,...etc. I appreciate all the advice. That's why I love this forum. I will always defend my point of view and I hope this facilitates dialogue and is not seen as a source of conflict.
Sam addressed that already in the end of post #25.I disagreed and challenged those that feel a 12 gauge pistol set up is not relevant to home security... to illegally enter my property and verify their opinion. I received notice that nobody is interested in verifying their bull****... as I expectected... so here we sit
Well spoken.Speaking for Zach, I think he was intending to take your hat, and your $100, if you were willing to take the bet.
How 'bout we turn the table? You break into my house. Be sure to bring $100 and a hat.How many are willing to test that opinion in real life? I am not trying to threaten anybody. I just bet that many of those who say the PG is a BS SD setup would never challenge that situation if confronted with it in real life, thus discreditting their opinion that it is not a reliable form of self defense.
You said:I'm not asking anyone to break into break into my house or support my arguement,
You said:I disagreed and challenged those that feel a 12 gauge pistol set up is not relevant to home security... to illegally enter my property and verify their opinion.
For those of you that think the pistol grip is "strictly hollywood'... how many of you are willing to break into my living room?!!!!! Put your money where your mouth is!
I am serious...
and I am quite confused that you think you are part of the equation
rogerjames
<SNIP>
My point is... for all of those that are so convinced that a pistol grip is an incompetent shot gun set up.... How many are willing to test that opinion in real life? I am not trying to threaten anybody. I just bet that many of those who say the PG is a BS SD setup would never challenge that situation if confronted with it in real life, thus discreditting their opinion that it is not a reliable form of self defense.
Um,.............No.A pistol-grip-only shotgun is obviously not the best choice. Its been said. Everyone gets it. I think (hope) everyone agrees.
Well, first you have to be willing to advocate .410 bore over the 12 ga. he already has. Now there are valid reasons someone must choose the tiny .410 over a more powerful round with a higher payload, but if you are an adult in reasonably good shape (outside of looking for a challenge on the skeet field) those reasons don't really apply to you.As an aside, why hasn't anyone suggested the Taurus Judge line as an alternative? It would seem ideal for a HD scenario, especially in the confines of a condo.
Clearly, since I've never been attacked by any tigers, my tiger-repelling rock is the best defense against such creatures.
Just because someone is a moderator doesn't mean they give up their right to express a valuable opinion based out of many years of experience. He's not abusing his authority, he's aiding to spread truth and value in a conversation that needs it. To tell the Mods that they can't share their experience and wisdom just because there are some less-, or "differently"-experienced folks who disagree with them would be to cut the heart and the light out of THR. Good moderation applies the standards of decency and responsibility for which this site stands but that doesn't mean that these well-educated folks are not allowed to share their experience and add value to our conversations.I can't believe that moderators in this thread are are carrying gasoline instead of water to quench a conversation that does more to set back reasonable RKBA interests than the Brady bunch. Our interests in firearms, training and self discipline CANNOT surrender to our egos or competetive nature.
No one was really even joking about that. The OP got a little overboard with his hyperbole, but even he eventually realized he was saying more than he meant. No worries -- we got it reigned back in. No one was advocating dueling pistols at dawn.regardless of what our real opponents think we do not even joke about using firearms to settle simple differences of opinon.
If you have a problem with a post or a thread, report it -- there's a button just for that. Don't be rude and snipe at the Mods, or claim to tell them their jobs. Thanks!Remember moderators? Moderator-one who moderates.
It is funny but silly.... a tiger repelling rock...
I'm sorry but that's the best quote of the thread , it's on topic and it speaks volumes about some home defense scenarios.
shuttin up now boss
Get a couple of wooded dowels from any hardware store and cut it to the length of a pistol-gripped shotgun and one with a full stock. Now, try walking around your house and see how each works, especially in corners and stairwells. I think you will find that the shorter "shotgun" allows you the easier ability to keep the weapon aimed. And at close quarters, (less than 10'), you will find it to be as accurate as any other weapon, to include a pistol. The bad rap people give pistol-gripped shotguns for HD is undeserved, but once you own one and practice with it you will realize that it is the best set-up.
A positive aspect to a conventional stock, also, is that if you carry at a rather vertical port arms position while searching for the Bad Guy, you obviate his ability to grab and disarm; you can turn in any direction without snagging the barrel on anything, and you can quickly lower to a firing position. Last, your wrist is not bent in an uncomfortable manner, which is the case on a PG long-stock shotgun. Push down with the weak hand, pull the stock to your ribcage with the strong-side elbow and turn your body to point.
It was not a constructive analogy -- a pistol grip only shotgun is far from a pet rock. IMO.
Sam, I didn't miss the point. And you can see I'm not really taking sides except for an informed and friendly debate.You missed Justin's intent. He was saying that the PGO shotgun must be adequate since the OP hasn't been killed in a bedroom gunfight yet. Then again, he hasn't had a home invasion yet, and hasn't done realistic head-to-head testing, either. Similar to someone keeping a tiger-repelling rock and knowing it works because there haven't been any tigers in his yard, in Omaha or Antarctica. "Yup, no tigers today...this is one GOOD rock!
He was pointing out that assuming an item does a particular thing well -- without testing it realistically to see how well or poorly it may perform that function -- is absurd.
-Sam
Sam1911
Quote:
As an aside, why hasn't anyone suggested the Taurus Judge line as an alternative? It would seem ideal for a HD scenario, especially in the confines of a condo.
Well, first you have to be willing to advocate .410 bore over the 12 ga. he already has. Now there are valid reasons someone must choose the tiny .410 over a more powerful round with a higher payload, but if you are an adult in reasonably good shape (outside of looking for a challenge on the skeet field) those reasons don't really apply to you.
Second, you have to be willing to suggest a handgun over a long-gun when it is solid, unassailable FACT that the average un- or semi-trained shooter can make much more accurate hits, faster -- in just about all situations -- with a long-gun than a handgun.
That's kind of two strikes against. Consider that the most effective load you can stuff into one is 3 pieces of 00 Buck (that's three projectiles at .33 caliber and about 55 gr.), and the Judge kind of defeats the best arguments of EACH of the schools of thought on defensive terminal ballistics. (Small/light projectiles instead of larger, heavier bullets from a handgun. Only three of them instead of the "cloud of death" proposed by defensive shotgun fans.)
Taurus has great marketing. But serious, experienced, defensive shooting folks are staying away from it in droves.