headstamp Id.

Status
Not open for further replies.

shenck

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
188
Location
Central PA
This may not be the right place for this, but fellow reloaders may have more insight into headstamps. I've not seen this before. 20220105_194457.jpg
 
Yep. Not much of a mystery. The ID is right on the headstamp. lol

I've shot some many years ago, but honestly can't remember how it performed, and I don't know that I've ever reloaded any of it before.
 
It reloads just fine. And it’s one of the cases where it looks like it’s a crimped primer, but most likely not. These shortages tend to produce a lot of brass for us range chickens that we haven’t seen before. Good luck.
 
I have a couple hundred of them in my mixed range brass pile and they work as well as all the others. Cant remember if they had crimped primers though. Never had one fail as of this date.
 
There's two Geco's (three if you count the one that sells insurance): Geco could be Dynamit Nobel A/G, Troisdorf, Germany; or it could be Gustav Genschow & Company, Durlach, Germany. From what I've seen, they're the same quality. Source for this is the IAA's headstamp codes page, linked above.
 
Geco = RUAG.

Ruag make excellent match quality ammo and primers. box of 2500 primers will fit in a box smaller than a box of 100ct .224 bullets. Cough* Federal. Cough* Overkill
 
There's two Geco's (three if you count the one that sells insurance): Geco could be Dynamit Nobel A/G, Troisdorf, Germany; or it could be Gustav Genschow & Company, Durlach, Germany. From what I've seen, they're the same quality. Source for this is the IAA's headstamp codes page, linked above.
I wonder if that’s why there are two different “spellings” on there headstamps? One being all caps (GECO) and the other just initial caps (Geco).

IAA’s spellings could be incorrect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top