http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34328
ELECTION 2004
Hillary close to decision
on run for White House
Inner circle set for pow-wow on possible bid for presidency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: August 29, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Joseph Farah
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON – Is she, or isn't she?
Sources close to former first lady Hillary Clinton say she is no longer discounting any chance of jumping into the 2004 race for the presidency.
Buoyed by polls that show President Bush's job-approval rating sagging and inspired by the fact that none of the nine declared Democratic presidential candidates' campaigns has caught fire, Clinton and her closest aides will huddle next week to explore their options.
Yesterday Clinton made an appearance on the "Today" show, a friendly media environment for her. Two weeks ago, her staff told the press she wouldn't be doing any interviews until October.
"The race for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 has changed totally in the past few weeks," wrote Richard Reeves in his column yesterday. "At the beginning of the summer, Hillary could comfortably deny having national presidential ambitions, because the comfortable conventional wisdom was that it didn’t really matter who the Democratic candidate would be, because President Bush had a lock on re-election."
However, several recent polls show Bush vulnerable – even trailing presidential aspirant Dick Gephardt in one survey. Clinton, who has previously leaned toward a run in 2008, in a wide-open contest with no incumbent in the White House eligible for re-election, now must factor in the possibility of a Democrat actually winning against Bush next year.
Practically, Clinton must decide to run or not before the end of the year to meet filing deadlines in November and December for the critical early primary elections.
Reeves and other analysts believe the nominee will be selected, for all intents and purposes, by March 2 – an election night Super-Tuesday, with primaries in California, New York, Texas, Ohio and eight smaller states.
If one candidate wins both the Iowa Caucuses Jan. 19 and the New Hampshire primary Jan. 27, it could realistically spell the end of most of the competition within the Democratic Party.
"Sen. Clinton is in the same high-stakes dilemma as one of her predecessors was 35 years ago," writes Reeves. "In 1968, New York Sen. Robert F. Kennedy was the most celebrated Democrat in the country after President Lyndon Johnson announced he would not run – after almost being defeated in New Hampshire by a critic of the war in Vietnam, Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota. Kennedy threw caution and old non-candidate promises to the wind and entered the contest against McCarthy and Hubert Humphrey. There are great similarities between then and now, and between New York's carpetbagger senators – Bobby from Massachusetts, Hillary from Arkansas – beginning with their name recognition, their armies of admirers and enemies and their dominating position in polls."
The four top current Democratic presidential candidates – Sen. John Kerry, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean – each poll between 15-20 percent of the vote in most surveys. When Clinton is thrown into the mix, she gets between 37 percent and 48 percent of the vote, according to national pollsters.
"In other words," said one insider, "it's Hillary's race to lose. The nomination is hers for the asking. The only question is whether she is ready to take a risk on beating Bush."
ELECTION 2004
Hillary close to decision
on run for White House
Inner circle set for pow-wow on possible bid for presidency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: August 29, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Joseph Farah
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON – Is she, or isn't she?
Sources close to former first lady Hillary Clinton say she is no longer discounting any chance of jumping into the 2004 race for the presidency.
Buoyed by polls that show President Bush's job-approval rating sagging and inspired by the fact that none of the nine declared Democratic presidential candidates' campaigns has caught fire, Clinton and her closest aides will huddle next week to explore their options.
Yesterday Clinton made an appearance on the "Today" show, a friendly media environment for her. Two weeks ago, her staff told the press she wouldn't be doing any interviews until October.
"The race for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 has changed totally in the past few weeks," wrote Richard Reeves in his column yesterday. "At the beginning of the summer, Hillary could comfortably deny having national presidential ambitions, because the comfortable conventional wisdom was that it didn’t really matter who the Democratic candidate would be, because President Bush had a lock on re-election."
However, several recent polls show Bush vulnerable – even trailing presidential aspirant Dick Gephardt in one survey. Clinton, who has previously leaned toward a run in 2008, in a wide-open contest with no incumbent in the White House eligible for re-election, now must factor in the possibility of a Democrat actually winning against Bush next year.
Practically, Clinton must decide to run or not before the end of the year to meet filing deadlines in November and December for the critical early primary elections.
Reeves and other analysts believe the nominee will be selected, for all intents and purposes, by March 2 – an election night Super-Tuesday, with primaries in California, New York, Texas, Ohio and eight smaller states.
If one candidate wins both the Iowa Caucuses Jan. 19 and the New Hampshire primary Jan. 27, it could realistically spell the end of most of the competition within the Democratic Party.
"Sen. Clinton is in the same high-stakes dilemma as one of her predecessors was 35 years ago," writes Reeves. "In 1968, New York Sen. Robert F. Kennedy was the most celebrated Democrat in the country after President Lyndon Johnson announced he would not run – after almost being defeated in New Hampshire by a critic of the war in Vietnam, Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota. Kennedy threw caution and old non-candidate promises to the wind and entered the contest against McCarthy and Hubert Humphrey. There are great similarities between then and now, and between New York's carpetbagger senators – Bobby from Massachusetts, Hillary from Arkansas – beginning with their name recognition, their armies of admirers and enemies and their dominating position in polls."
The four top current Democratic presidential candidates – Sen. John Kerry, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean – each poll between 15-20 percent of the vote in most surveys. When Clinton is thrown into the mix, she gets between 37 percent and 48 percent of the vote, according to national pollsters.
"In other words," said one insider, "it's Hillary's race to lose. The nomination is hers for the asking. The only question is whether she is ready to take a risk on beating Bush."