How did you decide to get the caliber(s) that you have?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I currently own 2 full sized .40 caliber pistols because I believe .40 to be a good defensive round.

I also own a subcompact 9mm. This little pistol only weighs 14 ounces unloaded. I wouldn't want to shoot .40 in a gun this size.

.357 magnum revolver-I like it for the woods. I like the fact that revolvers are not dependent on ammunition to cycle properly like autos are. It can be loaded with the first round snake shot & the rest heavy hard cast ammunition & I know it will function properly.

.22 mine happens to be a revolver. I'd like to get a good .22 target pistol. The ammunition is inexpensive, they are fun to plink with & it works good if I need to eliminate a small pest around the house.
 
My calibers were based on what the best "steals" there were at local Gun Shows...Not from Dealers, but from those selling in the aisles...I can't recall ever getting a lemon that way...Unlike a vehicle, never purchased n.i.b. So, I enjoy all the calibers for range duty, but narrow it when carrying...
 
Everyone needs a .22LR so that is where I started with a Colt huntsman in 1968 after acquiring my NYS permit.

Then the second purchase was for a hunting pistol so a Ruger Blackhawk in .357 with 6 1/2 barrel was added, smiths were few a far between in my neck of the woods. Also checked out all gun shops in most of VT (pre gun laws of ‘68) and no smiths in .357.

Then the bullseye bug bit and a .22 S&W model 41 was purchased-it still shoots better than I can.

Found a 6” S&W mod 28 and purchased it--still single!!

Had to have a .45 for bullseye 3 gun so acquired a .45 gold cup in 1970. Caught enough beaver and sold the pelts to purchase that one. This is the only one I regret selling.

Then in the 80's IPSC, .38 super Colt Enhanced and springfield .45 supermatch then 2004 SASS Ruger bisleys in .45 Colt and .357's and of course all guns had to be purchased to shoot those and improve on those and etc, etc.
 
Last edited:
While I own a few calibers, the ones I'm most intrigued by are those that bridge the gap between serious defense against human attackers and defense against animal attackers (not grizzly, as my hiking is chiefly done here in New England). Those all tend to be odd-ball calibers: 10mm, .41 Mag, .460 Rowland--although .45 Colt counts, if carried in a revolver that handles "magnum" loadings).

If you want the capacity and ease of reloading that a semi-auto offers, the "least odd" caliber is 10mm.

Besides that, I like it. :)
 
many of mine are because I love guns with original or unique designs and have got a nice collection of most of the ones I like for one reason or another.
7.62X25 = CZ52
9X18 = Makarov
45 acp and 38 Super=1911
32acp= Walther pp and Seecamp
9mm= BHP,HK P7,CZ and P38
I've got a few 10mm cause 10mm rocks
I have a couple 25acps I inherated
and I have quite a few 22s cause they're great
Love me some wheelguns to so 38/357, 44sp/44mag and 45 Colt are well represented too.
I kinda have a thing for Rugers too so when CDNN was closing out Super Redhawks in 480 Ruger I decided I needed one of those too
 
.40 S&W - when I was shopping for my first handgun, I did alot of research into the various calibers available. 9mm had okay stopping power, but made up for it in magazine capacity. .45ACP is sheer power, but its capacity was a bit lacking. I felt the .40 was bridging the gap between the two, with good capacity and respectable stopping power.

12-Gauge - My original HD weapon. Buckshot, Birdshot, Slug. Repeat until full. If the first two don't drop 'em, the last one will! My dear old dad lovingly refers to this loadup as "Fruit Salad".

.303 British - Now that my finances are stabilizing, I wanted to get a dedicated hunting rifle. Something that can bring down a deer effectively, as well as drop an irate feral hog or two. The Enfield was priced right, had a datestamp of 1943, and the guy I bought it from pulled out the whole Used Car Salesman act on me...I guess time will tell if I bought a lemon or not.
 
I try to keep it simple. .22, 9mm and .45acp. Couple .38spl's which I hardly ever shoot.
Same thing with shotguns, 12ga and 28ga. Everybody should reload if you like to shoot.
 
9x19- because its cheap and fun to shoot, high cap for ccw
45ACP- waited until I was set up for reloading before I bought a 1911. Guns are cheap, feeding them is expensive.
30-06- great overall hunting round
12ga- there's just something about pushing the field with an old LC SxS
 
I own a .380 and a 9mm but honestly cannot remember the last time I shot either.
I no longer own a .40 or a .44.

I shoot mostly .45 acp, next would be .45LC, and handload for both.
I shoot a fair bit of .22LR as well.
I own several .357s and a .41 Mag and load for them as well.
Recently bought a 10mm and load for it too.

Mostly, I "decided" to shoot what I shoot well. Then I decided to handload so I could shoot more. :)
 
It was quite the evolution, for me.

When I first started out, I started with 22, because it is cheap to shoot, and easy to shoot accurately. This hasn't changed, and it is still probably my favorite caliber, both for rifle and pistol.

My next gun was a 45. I liked the idea of the good stopping power, without having to rely as much on bullet expansion. If one is to rely on bullet expansion, the 45 can get AWFULLY big. It kicks more than a 9mm, but not so much as to be uncomfortable. But enough that it takes twice as long to get back on target.

For several years, all I had was a 22LR handgun (my Ruger Mk. II) and the 45 ACP. (Ruger P90)

The next gun I added was a Ruger 10/22. I wanted a 22 rifle. No brainer. Lots more accurate than the pistol, free extra velocity from the longer barrel.

After that, I finally broke down and bought a 9mm Glock. I had been wanting one since they came out. But I bought the 34, which I never really bonded with. My rationale was that it was cheaper to shoot, and I was shooting a lot more, and paying $20 a box for 45 was starting to really hurt. 22 is fun, but sometimes I want a bit of a kick. By this point, I was hand-loading all my ammo. 9mm was not worth reloading. I believe I could handload it for around $6 a box (remember, I needed to buy FMJ bullets to be suitable for the polygonal rifled Glock barrel) and I could buy it for $9 a box at the time. My reloads were slightly more accurate.

45 is GREAT to reload for. There is real cost savings, and handloads are noticeably more accurate than factory rounds. It is a low pressure round, and so it is pretty forgiving, although one has to watch for double-charges. The cases are big enough so as to be easily distinguished from all the 9mm and 40 S&W that is always laying around.

Then, I got a bad S&W 64. Stainless or nickel 357/38 4" revolver. I had grown tired of chasing brass from the 45. It was ever so nice to just dump the empties into my hand and put them back into the box for later use. A light 38 Special handload feels almost the same as a hyper velocity 22. I liked loading light 38 Special level loads in the 357 Magnum cases, so as not to worry about chamber etching.

Then, I figured: "I like the size of 45 ACP better, and I know that light hand loads are fun. I should get a 44 Magnum, and I can do everything from target shooting with light loads to deer hunting with heavy loads. Or just occasionally touching off a few Magnums just for the fun of it." I was not disappointed. I found a 7.5" Ruger Redhawk Hunter in 44 Magnum used. It is easily the most accurate centerfire handgun I've got. I've got it scoped, and can shoot smaller groups at 25 yds with it than I can shoot at 7 yds. with a 1911. I can keep them all on a paper plate at 50 yds. offhand. It has me wanting another Redhawk, with a 4" barrel, which I'd use as the home defense gun. (with 44 Special defense loads)

Next, I wanted a Makarov in 9 mm. I had a friend who had one, but wouldn't sell it. But he DID have a Bersa Model 83 (predecessor to the Thunder 380) in 380 ACP. It is an all-around finer gun; just not quite as powerful. 380 ACP is super-expensive to shoot; more than 45 ACP for some damned reason. So I bought the dies, and can reload this for 1/3 the cost of factory ammo. I came to find out that 380s can be inherently accurate, due to the fixed barrel design of the blow-back guns designed for them. I shoot this little 380 as well as I shoot a 1911. Probably better, actually. Makarov would have the advantage of having cheap factory ammo available, but this is a finer gun. I'm torn, but it is too late now. Makorovs used to go for $100, which I believe they are worth. But not $250 they're selling for now. I'll burn in hell before I'll pay $250 for a crudely made Russian gun, no matter HOW big the cult following is for it. (I am looking for a CZ-82 locally though....)

Next, I bought a Hi-Power for my wife in 9 mm. I still had the dies from before, and it is still questionable as to whether it is worth reloading for. Much nicer gun than the Glock 34, IMO. Much easier to shoot accurately, with its single action trigger.

Then, my great uncle gave me a bolt action Remington 788 in 6 mm Remington. This cartridge is still dying a slow death. I'm damned glad I reload. My hand loads are 100% more accurate than the sole factory load I can find locally.

I tried an SKS. I thought it was a cool gun, because it was the daddy of the AK-47. It's 7.62 mm round, I thought was superior to the .223 that the AR uses. I still believe the round is better, when a hit can be made. The problem is the gun was not to accurate. Maybe 6" at 100 yards, if I'm really having a good day. Not at all in the same league as an AR. But then, this was a $100 gun, not a $800 one. ;) My local range only allows single loading of rifles, so this gun wasn't much fun to me. I sold it before I tried reloading for it.

So, after 14 years of shooting and about 10 of reloading, my favorite rounds are:

  • 22LR
  • 44 Magnum
  • 45 ACP
  • 380 ACP
  • 357 Magnum
  • 6 mm Rem

I'm betting I would like 243 Win and 223 Rem in rifles, if I ever loaded for them and had a gun for them. I also bet I would really like 9 mm Makarov.

If I had to choose based on today's prices and factory loadings, I would probably pick as such:

  • 22LR
  • 9mm Luger
  • 9mm Makarov
  • 223 Rem
  • 7.62 x 39

I'm sure that post put everyone to sleep, but I'm hoping the original poster got something out of it, at least. ;)
 
When it comes to caliber selection, my main concerns are:

1) price: deer hunters who shoot 3 shots in a season are free to shoot the most esoteric thing out there. Likewise, in the complete non-possibility that I were being run down by a Cape Buffalo, I would be happy to pay quite a bit (at that moment) for the perfect, laser-guided, hand-crafted piece of ammunition. I'd rather be able to shoot more at the range, so the per-piece matters. (I reload, though I'm still really a novice, for .45ACP.)

2) availability / longevity: I want calibers that have been around for a while and that (I hope) will be around for a while, in reasonable supply. Which is why I go for .22, 9mm, .45ACP, etc. Military calibers, or former / classic military calibers, help that. And since I live in the US, and the U.S. is a NATO country, that's the inventory I care about ;)

3) versatility: Guns and ammo have an interplay, with this factor. I like to shoot ammo for which there are guns that can take more than one kind of ammo. It's not an overriding concern (my .45ACPs don't shoot .460 Rowland, or even .45 Super), but I like it. A bolt action .22 can that can shoot various kinds of .22 ammo, for instance, a .223 that can shoot the military or civilian variants, and (one day) a .357 that can also shoot .38s. I also like calibers for which there are both pistols and longarms readily availble. (Sure, there are .50BMG pistols, sorta, but that's not quite what I mean.)

Calibers I've "settled on" (bearing in mind that I get to ponder shooting far more often than I have the chance to actually go, and that I have a wishlist that's a mile long for "one day, by and by, time and money depending") :


.22LR - cheap, fun, far quieter than any non-suppressed centerfires I know of, and with a variety of great (and affordable) guns. Also suitable for allowing appropriate kids to find out for themselves whether it's fun to cause action at a distance ;) There are also some outlandishly expensive .22 guns out there, which I'm glad of, because it expands the possibilities and raises the standards. Also, this is one caliber that is fairly neutral wrt available gun *types* -- there are autoloader pistols and revolvers, not to mention aftermarket kits that let you shoot it from a Cz-75, 1911, and others. There are rifles -- bolt action with magazine, bolt action single-shot, autoloaders with all kinds of variations ... I'd pine for reloadable .22LR if only it wasn't (thus far and still) so cheap in bulk. The .22s I've got (Ruger 22/45, Savage bolt action rifle) all run fine on the cheap stuff.

[.22 magnum: Had one rifle in this; enjoyed it a lot, but didn't like the cost of the ammo, got rid of the rifle.]

9mm: cheap for centerfire. Tons of guns available, and the few I've got are great fun. Though only one of mine is, I am glad that there are now (this year, a bumper crop!) quite a few CCW-appropriate 9mms, which have made me re-think one wish-list item, namely a "mousegun" in .380. Still might happen, but the 9s seem like a better overall choice now. My Kel-Tec Sub2000 is also an excellent way to send money downrange -- almost no recoil at all. (And there are other carbines in 9mm.)

.45ACP: Classic, feels good to shoot, and the most accurate gun I own (in my hands) is a .45ACP -- S&W 625. Though range time with 9mm also beats getting hit with a sharp stick in the eye, shooting .45 is my favorite. Just too expensive, and the preference isn't so strong that I turn down shooting with my Cz-75 :)

.223: I like to ponder some of the little history I know when I take note that both my Saiga and AR-15 shoot .223 :)

12ga: common. If I were to branch into other shotgun sizes, it'd be 20ga next, as next-most common.

timothy
 
.22LR - very cheap, target practice, train trigger skills, etc

9mm - fairly cheap, target practice, self defense, shtf, zombies, etc

.45 - self defense, shtf, etc

I'm a crappy shot with a revolver so these are the only 3 handgun calibers I need. If I need something more powerful, I need one (or a few) of my long guns
 
9mm for firepower - 18 rounds fast as you can pull the trigger.

.38 spl for IPSC and target shooting.

.357 for HD - because 7 rounds of Corbon DPX .357 will leave a mark.

12 ga. When you absolutely, positively, must lay down the law.
 
22's are just natural, easy to shoot and cheap to feed. I now have a dozen of them. My first centerfire handgun was in 45, and now I have six of those. Then the 44 magnum. I've had a couple, just the SRH now. Had to buy the big bores when I was young. The next was a 686 six inch 357, I was really disappointed by the recoil after the hot 44's. Very accurate gun that I haven't fired in years. I bought several 44 specials so I could shoot the 44 caliber in a smaller gun. A couple three 9mm's, just because. Throw in a few 25's and a 7.62X25 and that about covers it. If I had too, I could get by on just two handgun calibers, .22 and .45. I just glad I don't have too.:)
 
9mm- started here because I love the wundernines.
.22- cheaper plinking.
.45- made the mistake of buying a 1911. Now I have six .45 cal pistols.
.32- bought a Vz 61 Skorpion, just picked up a Colt 1903.
 
The only weapon I own that I put thought into caliber preference was my self defense/carry/home defense piece.

I decided on 9mm. I haven't seen definitive proof with all the testing that has been done that leads me to beleive 45 (my old choice) or 4o s&w are such huge improvements. With kids and medical bills, cost is important to me. I can shoot 9mm way more often to maintain and build proficiency. What's that? You reload you say? Well If I start reloading, I can still reload 9mm cheaper than 40 or 45.

Other than that...I own the standard variety stuff. 303, 223, 7.62x39, 45 acp, 40 s&w, 22, 12 &20 guages...I'm not even sure what all I have honestly...there's even some 32-20 thrown in there. :)
 
I started with .380 ACP and I kept it as my defense caliber for years. Then I moved up to 9 mm. because it is very controllable and powerful enough to be considered as a serious and reliable personal defense caliber. Now I am thinking about getting a .45 ACP 1911 handgun, mainly because all the glamour inherent to these guns. I would like to have a .22 LR conversion kit for my GLOCK 19, because I think it is an ideal caliber for plinking. It is fun and cheap. For home defense I also have a couple of pump shotguns, 12 gauge loaded with 00 buckshot.
 
I choose 9mm. I have .45's, 38/357's and had .40's. I like something I can shoot a lot on the cheap and find everywhere. With all the defensive 9mm choices out there and capacities they allow, I feel just fine with it. Good practice is the key to good shooting, and ya gotta be able to afford it.
 
well, the .380 was strictly was a consideration of something that i could carry in any clothing. especially HOT weather clothing. 45acp was something i have wanted for years. 44 mag is a hunting rig, i wanted something with enough oompf to kill anything i am likely to come across in the woods, without having so much recoil that i could shoot it with one hand if necessary without breaking or spraining my wrist. the 44 mag, with full power loads is right about at the limit. 22lr is a nice plinker, i have a ton of fun with that little gun, and the kids both enjoy shooting it.
 
My two cents

I'm old and gettin' more feeble by the day, and I wanted the biggest caliber I can handle. I actually qualified with a 45, but I can't carry one of those around all day - or pay for the ammo - so I chose the 9mm. Winter weather and wearing heavy jackets made me think revolver so I bought a 38 spl. to carry in an outer pocket.

I've practiced quite a bit with these and am comfortable with the 9mm. The revolver beats up my hand pretty much but I can stand two or three loads alright. Practice has made me stronger and I'm having fun.

And meeting a lot of good guys at the range and on the forums.
 
.357 SP101 was my first gun. I wanted a home defense and cc gun, that was affordable to practice with. I had decided on a judge, and then realised I didn't really care for the quality of Taurus. So I changed my mind.

Second Gun was a S&W 460 magnum in a 5" bbl. I got it because I wanted a bear stopper, trail gun, and I wanted a hand cannon in my collection. The versatility of the chambering really drew me in. It's my favorite gun I ever shot.

Next was a .22 LR Buckmark, because it's inexpensive to shoot, and fun to plink with.

Then I got a .40 S&W Stoeger Cougar, just for the hell of it. It's relatively inexpensive to shoot, and I wanted a center fire auto loader. Since then I've realised that revolvers are what really float my boat, so I probably won't buy another auto until I get a 1911 in .45 acp.

My latest is a Bond Arms in .45colt/.410 bore. It's just a fun gun, that seems like a classier version of a Judge. It's a snake slayer 4. It isn't terribly practical, but it's fun. It does drop in the pocket fairly easy, but more than that, it's just really well made. I tell my buddy who has a judge "If your gun is a Judge, well then this gun is the prosecuter."

Latest
 
I have always been a .45acp guy ever since i was a kid and my dad had his Colt 1911 he carried for business and shot while in the navy.
The other calibers i tried as i went along and learned about guns. The only one that disappointed me was the .40S&W.
I was never a 9mm guy as ive always felt the bullet was too small despite its faster speeds.
But i soon learned to over look that as it was less important than the recoil issues i hated with the .40
I love the 10mm and pray i can find another one i like and ammo becomes more available and cheaper as i just love shooting these at full power loads, Amazing round imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top