Alchymist
Member
I was told that linking to another site where I was asking for help was "not an action plan", so here's my "action plan"....
1) Write book on Constitutional rights - Done
2) Find publisher willing to publish - Done
3) Raise enough $$ to publish, put up web site, and get
book listed on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc - In progress
4) Hope the book makes an impact.
An extract from the other site (From the 8th chapter concerning 2nd Amendment):
"One of the most specious arguments against the individual right to keep and bear arms is the one that interprets the second amendment as referring to the militia or the army as having that right, and not the private citizen. Just about every army ever raised was equipped with weapons of some sort, from clubs, swords, spears, and axes to rifles and machine guns; the list is endless. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that the founding fathers knew that any militia or army would of necessity have arms, thus there was no need codify it. What did need spelling out was the belief that all citizens had the right to keep and bear arms. This was an inherent right, not a privilege bestowed by the Constitution, and was thus spelled out in the Second Amendment to guarantee that right “shall not be infringed”. Those are the word from the amendment, not mine. The Second Amendment reads:
“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”.
It doesn’t say the right of the militia, or the right of the state, it says “..the right of the people…”. How can anyone misconstrue this? One has only to look to the writings of many of the statesmen and founders to realize that the true interpretation was meant to be that the private citizen was the recipient of that right".
Here's a link to the other site:
http://forum.pafoa.org/commercial-business-132/77434-serious-request-help-donations.html
Interestingly enough, the site linked to had no problem with the post, THR said it wasn't a plan, (which I guess it really wasn't, but the intent was clear), and a third site killed it completely!
1) Write book on Constitutional rights - Done
2) Find publisher willing to publish - Done
3) Raise enough $$ to publish, put up web site, and get
book listed on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc - In progress
4) Hope the book makes an impact.
An extract from the other site (From the 8th chapter concerning 2nd Amendment):
"One of the most specious arguments against the individual right to keep and bear arms is the one that interprets the second amendment as referring to the militia or the army as having that right, and not the private citizen. Just about every army ever raised was equipped with weapons of some sort, from clubs, swords, spears, and axes to rifles and machine guns; the list is endless. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that the founding fathers knew that any militia or army would of necessity have arms, thus there was no need codify it. What did need spelling out was the belief that all citizens had the right to keep and bear arms. This was an inherent right, not a privilege bestowed by the Constitution, and was thus spelled out in the Second Amendment to guarantee that right “shall not be infringed”. Those are the word from the amendment, not mine. The Second Amendment reads:
“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”.
It doesn’t say the right of the militia, or the right of the state, it says “..the right of the people…”. How can anyone misconstrue this? One has only to look to the writings of many of the statesmen and founders to realize that the true interpretation was meant to be that the private citizen was the recipient of that right".
Here's a link to the other site:
http://forum.pafoa.org/commercial-business-132/77434-serious-request-help-donations.html
Interestingly enough, the site linked to had no problem with the post, THR said it wasn't a plan, (which I guess it really wasn't, but the intent was clear), and a third site killed it completely!
