The concept of discerning what "your lane" is, and rigorously staying within "your lane" is occasionally quite lost on people who have one set of knowledge but are asked to speak to a related area on which they are unconsciously quite ignorant.
The effects of this goofball lady on Fox are probably pretty minimal, other than providing deep humor for thousands of gun forum sorts all over the country.
But I've witnessed a shockingly similar situation nearly destroy a gun club.
A couple of years back our own shooting club went through a crisis of leadership in which one party decided to pass a really odd and sweeping set of unusually draconian new range rules. Lots of bizarre and selfish and self-serving and inexplicable stuff.
(As an example: No rifles over .30 cal. Forgetting and ignoring that we have hundreds of members who'd probably really like to be allowed to continue to sight in their .35 Remington or .45-70 deer rifles. Lots of stuff just that absurd.)
In the ensuing backlash, as the leadership came under threat of revolt by the membership, the Board hired a "forensics expert" to come in and do a study of our ranges and write a report on our safety standards -- ostensibly to defend all the weird new rules.
Well the "expert" was indeed a respected long-time member of our state's forensics cadre, but he was a TOOL MARKS expert. In other words, the guy who looks at the marks left on spent cases or recovered bullets to match either one to the gun that fired it. NO training or experience in exterior ballistics, range design, or the practicalities of containing rounds fired at targets.
And, probably predictably, he wrote a brief report condemning everything and anything anyone ever did at the range, concluding with the memorable statement that "You couldn't PAY ME to shoot here."
This being a range that's been in constant use for half a century and has had exactly ONE "suspected" (but never confirmed) pistol round leave the property, ever.
The upshot of it was the membership revolt the Board feared, the Board was ousted and replaced with people they'd tried to throw out of the club for trumped up "safety violations", and the range rules were comprehensively re-written to reflect reality and common practice.
But the whole place was scared and shaken by having this "expert's" paid report condemning every aspect of our practices. So when our new range rules came out they were, indeed, a lot more restrictive than they had been.
Slowly, over the course of the last two years, we've walked step by slow step back down from our death-grip on overheated "safety" restrictions back to about 96% where we were before the initial kerfuffle.
But there was serious damage done and we're still healing as a group. Friendships broken, long-standing members lost or driven away, and a lot of negative "press" within the membership that those "at the top" have no sense and make up stupid rules and then change them all that time. It will probably be a decade before all of that is smoothed away.
NEVER miss the chance to show how intelligent you REALLY are by admitting, "I don't know. That's not my area of expertise."
