Loosedhorse
member
^^I agree with your post entirely. However, we shouldn't overlook the limitations of gel tests.
First: as you said, gel simulates pig muscle. How well it simulates hits into human fat, lung and abdomen is an open question.
Second, I don't believe anyone has come up with a "calibrated" bone simulant (meaning, we know it behaves similarly to human bone when struck by bullets), and so we do guesstimates of how bone hits (ribs) would lessen or increase the penetration of bullets.
Finally, gel is only capable of helping us estimate penetration, not effectiveness at stopping an attacker. Stopping an attacker is what most of us are looking for.
First: as you said, gel simulates pig muscle. How well it simulates hits into human fat, lung and abdomen is an open question.
Second, I don't believe anyone has come up with a "calibrated" bone simulant (meaning, we know it behaves similarly to human bone when struck by bullets), and so we do guesstimates of how bone hits (ribs) would lessen or increase the penetration of bullets.
Finally, gel is only capable of helping us estimate penetration, not effectiveness at stopping an attacker. Stopping an attacker is what most of us are looking for.
Last edited: