This is moving from an observation into an argument, and before it goes too far into personalities, let me back up a bit and explain my original intention.
The issue here seems to be a question of terminology vs. common usage. Please forgive me if I gave the impression that "Eastern Arabic Numerals" is correct or accurate; what I attempted to show that the term has entered common usage. Right or wrong, this term has become a
thing.
Since THR discussions can be both social and academic by turns, I was pleased by Roverguy's informed statements. I think it is better to learn what is correct than insist that I always am. My intention was to contrast (rather than deny) his statement against examples of common usage.
BTW, Roverguy's comments encouraged me to ask Jonathan Ferguson at the Royal Armouries for his opinion on this specific usage. There may be more to his reply later since he asked for a second opinion, but here is our verbatim email exchange from today:
-----Original Message-----
From: David DeLaurant
Sent: 05 December 2022 16:34
To: Jonathan Ferguson
Subject: Quick question, possibly loaded
Would you kindly spare an opinion regarding a recent discussion from The High Road's rifle forum.
The attached photos show the rear sight markings from a Persian Mauser and an Egyptian Hakim. How would you refer to the numeral systems used on these?
Some possible answers:
Arabic numerals
Hindu numerals
Eastern Arabic numerals
Indo-Arabic numerals
Persian/Egyptian numerals
indigenous numbers
curious foreign numbers
Would your choice likely be different during a chat with a general audience than in the text of a museum monograph?
Personally I don't believe there is a wrong answer here, just degrees of rightness.
You opinion will not be later used against you in court. - Dave
-----Reply-----
Hmm. Probably "Arabic" although if I was just looking at the Persian rifle I'd likely call that "Persian" as it seems easier to be specific there.
I might instead (depending how much time I had) check with my colleague who looks after Asian and African collections. Although 'modern' firearms like these are my responsibility, they are more culturally and linguistically aware as they cover all arms and armour of those continents from the year dot until the late 19th century.
What do you think, Scot?
Jonathan
Jonathan Ferguson
Keeper of Firearms & Artillery
Associate Editor, ARMAX - the Journal of Contemporary Arms (
https://www.armaxjournal.org/)
National Firearms Centre
Armouries Drive, Leeds, LS10 1LT
01132 201875