wild billz
Member
I’m in the market for a new .22, as seen by some of my previous posts. By the way I believe I am settled on the CZ 452, probably the trainer version. Here is my logic: I want a decent rifle, thus the CZ, it has adjustable sights, and trigger, nice iron sights, and still can be scoped. My range I shoot at only goes out to 100 yards. I shoot mainly at 50 yards right now. I don’t hunt.
Anyhow my brother in law and best friend both say get a .17M2, better ballistics and more range than a .22. I agree, but it’s a way more expensive caliber. Again I don’t hunt, and I won’t be shooting out to moire than 100 yards. If I did hunt with the .22, it would be fine for anything that I would shoot and at the distance I am likely to shoot at. I don’t live out on a prairie.
My brother in law says get an AR15 and a converter so it can shoot .22, wouldn’t you rather have an AR? I say yes, I’d like an AR, but why get a converter for it to shoot .22, buy the .22, and then get an AR for when you want an AR. Then I have 2 dedicated platforms instead of changing one thing into another, and for probably the same price.
Am I missing some virtue about the .17 or an AR? Other rifles to research comparable to the CZ?
Anyhow my brother in law and best friend both say get a .17M2, better ballistics and more range than a .22. I agree, but it’s a way more expensive caliber. Again I don’t hunt, and I won’t be shooting out to moire than 100 yards. If I did hunt with the .22, it would be fine for anything that I would shoot and at the distance I am likely to shoot at. I don’t live out on a prairie.
My brother in law says get an AR15 and a converter so it can shoot .22, wouldn’t you rather have an AR? I say yes, I’d like an AR, but why get a converter for it to shoot .22, buy the .22, and then get an AR for when you want an AR. Then I have 2 dedicated platforms instead of changing one thing into another, and for probably the same price.
Am I missing some virtue about the .17 or an AR? Other rifles to research comparable to the CZ?