Is Taurus a Good Brand for Revolvers

My experience with taurus revolvers has been do not buy online you want to be able to inspect them and know what to look for before you put your money down. I own 5 of them and 3 of the 5 I had to do a little work on them to make them right all 5 of them were online purchases.
 
The Executive Grade is just a sales gimmick. Revolver Guys reviewed the gun. They said the grips sucked to the point that they interfered with reloading and ejecting, plus, that the gun internally is the same as every other Taurus. Also, they weren't at all pleased with the sights.

View attachment 1196961



View attachment 1196962

Get a Rossi RP63 for less money. It has the same finish, but is in .357 Magnum, and costs less.
I never had enough interest in the executive grade Taurus to research it but that definitely seems like an issue to me. I agree that if I were in the market for this class of revolver I would be taking a hard look at the Rossi.
 
I have a couple of Taurus revolvers from the mid 1980s. They are both all steel 3" barrel 6 shot 357 magnums. I have shot them thousands of times. Almost all reloads although never max loads. Many 80-90% of max. at most. Most are moderate loads but in the 357 range. They are still as tight as new and timing is perfect. My experience is that the 1980s Taurus revolvers are very good. I can only speak from my experiences. Best wishes!
 
Last year my LGS had a 3in 856 in the sales case.
Tritium front sight with orange outline.
Light, 6 shots, good barrel length.
I've had bad experiences with Taurus from years back, hadn't touched one since.
So I asked to see it, I started messing with the trigger DA then SA.
Seemed ok.
I started staging the trigger slowly in DA, right after the cylinder stop engaged, with a little more trigger pressure the hammer would drop.... halfway.
I was able to replicate this several times for the sales clerk.
....he put it back in the case. 🤔
That's the common issue a lot of people have been having with the 856. The timing has been off or goes out. They've been DIYing to fix it.
 
I really like that Taurus model and am happy that Taurus is trying hard to keep revolvers tastefully contemporary and relevant.

However, I have such a bad taste from selling them (admittedly 30 years ago) and have to deal with warranty/repair, I just can't bring myself to buy one. On another site, some folks bit the bullet and there were mixed results. Some seemed to be OK and others had problems right off the bat. The problem ones needed new springs, minor fitting, or a return to Taurus. I just don't want to get involved in that. These were Executive Grade guns that are supposed to have a higher level of fitting and attention to detail.

I know Taurus is trying to improve quality and I wish them the best. I would love to buy a few of their models without having hesitation lurking in the back of my head.
 
Trigger can easily be improved especially with all of the aftermarket support for Ruger and Smith. The QC, warranty service, availability of spare parts, build quality, and resale/trade-in value will favor Ruger.


No, it's from recently. I'm objective. I'm not a fanboy of any one manufacturer. If you check my post history, I have gone back and forth with other Taurus haters on this forum and others. I've been a member of TaurusArmed.com for a decade now. I've owned 8 Taurus firearms in the last decade, and inquired and researched about others I was interested in. I can't say that I would recommend them to anyone knowing what I know now at this time.

TaurusArmed and social media is full with people who only had good experience with their examples, defended Taurus against naysayers, and then years later learned their lesson when they got a lemon and had to deal with Taurus CS. I take what people who are snobs or who are holding a decade old grudge against Taurus with a grain of salt. What I'm personally basing my opinion on is current information.

Yes triggers can be improved. I've done it a time or two over the years. But if I am choosing between two guns why choose the one that needs improvement? That Redhawk I mentioned earlier that has a really nice trigger and shoots accurately had to go back to Ruger before it got right. Virtually any brand out there has lemons. That is why I won't order online.. If I can't put my hands on before buying then I am not interested.

I admittedly don't have a great deal of exposure to Taurus. But the two I have were bought recently and I've had no problems with them. I also don't have the inventory many here have. My guns were all bought for specific reasons. But I have never so far bought a lemon. And I can't put that tag on either of my Taurus revolvers. Very happy with them.
 
They're cheap....
Well, they used to be.
I have a Taurus revolver and it's fine. Like has been said above, it is not a shining example of flawless craftsmanship, but that's not what they were going for. Mine is a police trade in 4" .38 Special that I paid $200 for. For that gun at that price, it was worth it.
But now you see threads where people are asking if they should buy a particular Taurus revolver for $900 or something like that. That's where they lose me.

It's like buying tools at Harbor Freight. If you don't want to spend a lot of money and need to get the job done, it will work fine.
But the prices have been going up with Taurus. If Harbor Freight tools cost what Snap On or MAC costs, no one would buy them. I feel like Taurus is moving that direction.
 
Well, they used to be.
I have a Taurus revolver and it's fine. Like has been said above, it is not a shining example of flawless craftsmanship, but that's not what they were going for. Mine is a police trade in 4" .38 Special that I paid $200 for. For that gun at that price, it was worth it.
But now you see threads where people are asking if they should buy a particular Taurus revolver for $900 or something like that. That's where they lose me.

It's like buying tools at Harbor Freight. If you don't want to spend a lot of money and need to get the job done, it will work fine.
But the prices have been going up with Taurus. If Harbor Freight tools cost what Snap On or MAC costs, no one would buy them. I feel like Taurus is moving that direction.
Inflation, rising labor costs, and rising material costs is causing EVERYTHING TO BECOME MORE EXPENSIVE.

I still think anything over $300 for a bog-standard S&W Model 642 is too much. Yet they go for more than that these days. Heck, used run-of-the-mill S&W Model 10s are $500-$600 guns these days.

Look at Ruger GP100s, they're in the $700 price range online. And that's before you add shipping, FFL transfer fee, background check fee (some states add that), and sales tax. To me, a GP100 is a $400-$450 gun because prior to all the craziness for the last decade. That's what they've been priced at..

Yes, Taurus is rising their prices. But so is everyone else. With the dollar being weaker, overall, guns are staying the same in the pricing hierarchy.

Also, Taurus is rising their prices for another reason. The buying public perceives a higher sticker price to mean higher quality. I'll give you a great example. Back in the 1980s when HK released the P7 to compete against the Beretta 92, the P7 was actually priced lower than the 92. They didn't sell. So, HK raised the price and labeled it as being a luxury quality item and suddenly, the gun sold.

Look at foreign car manufacturers too. Hyundai used to be a basic 4-banger econo-box sedan. Nothing fancy, nothing special. Just a low-tier car for folks. Now, they have a luxury brand, are making sports cars, and their base brand is far more expensive and viewed as a quality product.

Taurus is one of the largest firearm manufacturers in the globe. Outside of the US, they're viewed in better regard. My contacts in South Africa love 'em because they're reliable and cheaper than GLOCKs, Beretta, CZ, S&W, etc...

As for the Executive Grade line. They took a standard stainless 856, gave it a satin bead-blast finish, had Altamont make some fancy (useless) stocks for it, had the laser engrave a different logo on it, and throw it in a fancy package.

People will buy it and are buying it.

But inside, it is a bog-standard 3" Model 856.
 
Last edited:
I am to the point where I don’t trust ANY manufacturer. I enjoy bashing Taurus as my 94’s transfer bar broke. But, I had to send a Ruger SP101 back due to the cylinder binding and a S&W 629 back because 1 of the 6 chambers was basically unfinished. It would not eject a casing and left the expensive brass ringed with machine marks.

Whatever you buy, examine it closely before signing the paperwork.
 
I can't add much except I've owned quite a few products from Taurus over the years but only one revolver, an early Gaucho. It hits where I aim it and has never given a problem. I had a PT1911 that would hang with my Colt Gold Cup nation Match but let a grandson talk me out of it. I retain a PT1911 in 9mm. The others are gone due to me finding something more interesting but none ever had a problem. Maybe I am just lucky. Maybe all the Taurus internet hate is undeserved. Reading bad reviews of products over the years will clue you in that many people have no clue as to how things are suppose to work and that isn't just with firearms.
 
I have been carrying taurus revolvers for around 15 years. Owned several from older 80s stuff to present. I currently edc a model 605 357 mag with 2 inch barrel. It's been my main carry piece for the last 7 or so years. Has had plenty of range time and I trust it with my life. There has been duds I've heard of but even the mighty Smith and Wesson and similar put out duds. I've never had an issue with any of the taurus wheelguns I've owned and I will continue to buy them.
 
I've had nothing but good luck with taurus but my sample size has been small, a 651, a 431, and a PT99.
 
There is always a niche for anything made.
As far as tools go I buy a lot of harbor freight Chinese tools that I may only use only a few times instead if buying higher prices, higher quality tool that will just sit around after it gets used.
But for tools I use for work everyday I buy higher quality name brand tools with a warranty that I can turn in when it breaks or strips out.

I'm not bashing Taurus or other lower quality Firearms or gun related items.
I'll stick with Ruger or Smith & Wesson for my revolvers for the most part.

Same with reloading, most of my stuff is RCBS, Hornaday and Dillion, but I do have some Lee stuff that I like.
Their hand primers, their bench prime Their lead hardness tester.
But the majority is the other higher priced, higher quality stuff.

It all works, just have to see what works for your price budget and needs.


I've got over forty revolvers, I do have two OLD Rossi 971 - 357 magnum revolvers with the barrel compensator and a Rossi 44spl, can't remember the model. They do shoot good and I've carried one of the 971s off and on over the years. Switched out to a Smith 642 airweight in 38spl about ten years ago and I have one new in the box if this one takes a ****.
Some times when I take my twelve year old grandson out shooting up in the Cascade mountains I'll carry a 971 and my grandson will carry one. But lately he likes to carry the Glock 20 in 10mm.

It's all good, that's why I like to buy used, Firearms or reloading supplies.

If I don't like what ever I buy I generally recoup what ever I paid for the item and move on.
 
I don't think that a cheap tool is a good comparison. In my experience, cheapo tools are made of worse materials, skimp on materials, don't work as well, don't last as long, etc.

IMHO, it's more like nicer 2x4's versus cheaper ones. You can grab a bunch of the nicer ones and you just have to kind of glance at them to make sure they're straight. The bin of cheaper ones will have more that are crooked and some of them have a shaved corner or something, but the straight inexpensive ones work just as well as the more expensive boards (maybe not quite as pretty).

It seems like what people are saying about Taurus is that you're more likely to get one that doesn't work correctly. If they work fine, though, they work fine. Maybe a little bit of a stiff trigger or unbeautiful finish, but I've got a bunch of them that are decades old and continue to go bang with boring regularity.

I got this one last year (used). Didn't have a small-frame 357, and this one was under $300 OTD. It goes bang just fine. Trigger is reasonably good. Nothing wrong with it. I could have paid more for a Smith or Ruger (as I do sometimes), but they wouldn't actually work any better. They're just a little nicer-looking. Just my opinion, worth what you paid for it. :)

 
Last edited:
If I were on a budget I'd consider a Taurus revolver but I'm not so I'd rather pay more for a used S&W or Ruger. I wouldn't consider a Charter Arms due to what I read on various forums. I am curious about Taurus but not $400 curious. I've no personal experience with Taurus or Charter
 
That's the common issue a lot of people have been having with the 856. The timing has been off or goes out. They've been DIYing to fix it.
Had that problem with my brand new 856. It was in my possession for less than a day before it was on the way back to them to be repaired. Came back still not right and I DIY'd it myself. Last Taurus I'll ever buy unless I can have it in my hands and give it a complete checkout before I lay my money down for it.
 
I was in the market for an inexpensive .357 for farm chores and general plinking. I chose the Taurus 66 7 shot. While it's not a S&W or a Colt, I've been nothing but impressed with it. It's done everything requested of it. I also have S&Ws...They're nice but not worth double the Taurus.
 
The main reasons I own some taurus revolvers is because I like 3 inch barrels and taurus offers or has offered in the past a lot of models with 3 inch barrel's. The other reason is I carry them daily here on my place working and I may be feeding hay, cutting wood, crawling around under a truck or tractor etc. sometimes they get banged around scraped against stuff or dropped. When I drop one in the dirt I pick it up and dust it off and don't give it another thought. Wouldn't subject a S&W,Colt or Ruger to that.
 
I bought one about 40 years ago…
I read about them …
Yada, yada…

Buy once and cry once… Then put it in your safe and don’t shoot it. A Colt or S&W will hold value…

Taurus like other manufacturers should not be trusted. Inspect it thoroughly before purchasing. Not to many years back every S&W revolver came with a canted barrel.

I personally know a YouTuber that has shot a lot of rounds thru a Taurus 38/357 revolver. I can’t recall the model. It is also probably 15 years old. He feeds it hand loads.

Gun Sam Revolver Aficionado on YouTube has not had good luck with Taurus. He just purchased a G3C in 40 caliber and is sending it back. He has had issues with a Taurus Revolver too. His Glock has issues too !!!

Taurus does stand behind their products. They seem to be moving more production to USA.

I look at Davidsons Gallery of Guns. There is a reason if they don’t sell a brand or model. They warranty any gun they sell with a lifetime warranty.
 
I have a grand total of two Taurus ownership experiences. I still have both and they are better than good. I have owned a pile of Rugers. Ruger customer service knows me well. So well that I have avoided Rugers when making recent purchases. I have a Ruger SP101 right now that's a pretty bad example of QC. Stainless finish is rough and sight is maxed out in up adjustment and POI is still low. Ruger subscribes to the principal that they don't have time to get it right the first time, but they do on the second.
 
As an over a decade long (former) Taurus fan and verbose defender, I cannot recommend them. A Ruger SP101 isn't much more expensive than the Taurus Executive, but it's a much better revolver built by a company with a much better track record and reputation. The newer 856 revolvers are hit or miss reported by TaurusArmed forum members who actually own them. I started a thread about whether I should trade my Taurus 85 for the new 856 before I wanted the extra round and pinned front sight. The overwhelming response was NOT to do it, and the reasons why were with various on going issue they've personally had AND customer service horror stories.

When they were $200 and S&W and Ruger where $500-$800, it was worth the gamble for me. In the $450-$500 range, I rather put a $650 NIB Ruger on layaway or save $150 more to buy it outright. It will be worth it in the long run and grand scheme. It will also retain it's resale and trade value unlike a used Taurus will.
Can you provide any specifics about your negative experiences with Taurus?
 
Back
Top