Is the 1911 the perfect auto design for a carry gun?

Status
Not open for further replies.

chaim

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,846
Location
Columbia, MD
OK, as many of you know by now I am probably going to graduate school next semester and there is at least a 50/50 chance that I'll be in a carry state. Getting realistically closer to being in a carry situation I have been thinking alot lately about carry guns.

Since I planned to carry a revolver most of the time and lately I've been thinking about keeping the manual of arms as close as possible I have been mostly thinking about DAO or DA/SA guns with the first shot decocked but with the safety disabled to keep the manual of arms as close to a revolver as possible. However, I do love the 1911 and last night I spent some time with it and it got me thinking.

While I am not in a carry state I do carry concealed around the house from time to time (to some degree, it is in case of break-in, but mostly it is for practice and familiarization) and last night I spent a few hours with my 1911.

Anyway, on to the reasons that I think it may be out and out the perfect auto for carry:

-Most carry guns are a compromise. Most people find a full sized gun to be too big to comfortably carry but if you go with a smaller gun you have one with less shootability and a shorter sight radius.

The 1911, however, is a single stack design so it is very thin for a full sized service auto. This means it isn't too hard to conceal (I had this thing in an Uncle Mike's IWB holster with my shirt tucked around it while around anti-gun family members and they didn't have a clue that I was armed). In an IWB holster this thing would practially disappear and it would probably still conceal pretty well OWB as well. However, this is still a full sized auto so you have enough heft that it is very controllable for fast follow-up shots, and you have a long sight radius for relatively easy accuracy. Being a single stack you lose a little in capacity v. a double stack full-size but it is far easier to conceal than the full-sized double stack (and even many compact double stacks) and 8+1 rounds of .45acp (most modern 1911 mags hold 8 and fit flush or nearly flush) is certainly respectable and 10rnd mags are available for reloads if needed.

-Also, despite not having a problem with DA/SA or DAO autos, I certainly see an advantage to the SA only (the way I see it they all have advantages, which is more important to you, or me, is what is important). With a SA auto one does need to keep the safety engaged and one must disengage it in a self defense situation (a potential drawback), however having a consistent trigger pull is a large advantage as it is simply easier to have almost the same POI which you lose with a DA/SA and the shorter faster trigger pull v. a DAO means quicker follow-up shots (that fraction of a second could be the difference between being shot or not being shot). So, I do see disadvantages of each (the use of a safety does cost a fraction of a second on the first shot) but they all have real advantages over each other as well. For me, if it wasn't for the desire to keep a fairly consistent manual of arms and my desire to mainly use a revolver I would prefer the advantages of condition one carry (part of why I got my CZ 75 at first and part of why I like the Taurus safety design so much).



I spent a couple hours sitting in front of a computer with my 1911 on and I found that the 5" barrel was acceptable IWB while sitting, however I wouldn't mind a shorter barrel. For those who don't need, or want, a full length gun the 1911 design is available in many barrel lengths (most manufacturers offer a 4" version and a 3 1/2" version, many offer a 3" and I think one or two have 4 1/2" versions though I'd have to double check that one). For me, I don't think the weight of the gun would be an issue, though just wearing it around the house I haven't been that active with it on. For those who do want lighter guns there are plenty of options as well depending upon how much weight they want to shave off- the steel framed 3, 3.5 and 4" guns shave a few oz off, and most manufacturers who make 1911s also have aluminum alloy models (some at affordable prices) that cut the weight down to 24 or 25oz up to about 31oz depending upon the barrel length. So even for someone who wants a small light gun a 1911 can be had in a 3" or 3.5" barrel and as light as 24oz, we are getting close to pocket gun size/weight here.

So, even in its steel framed variations, and certainly when getting into the short barrels and aluminum frames, the 1911 offers a very attractive carry package. Easy to conceal, powerful, in steel frames or full-size aluminum frames it is easy to control, they tend to be very accurate, and most people can carry them comfortably (the thinness adds to comfort and for those who need it one can go aluminum alloy for weight).

What do those of you think who are already carrying?
 
Last edited:
I used to carry a Commander and did so for years. Now I believe that the SIG or Glocks are better designs for conceal carry for most people.

Both the SIG and Glock can be brought into action by drawing and firing. The 1911 must be carried cocked and locked (no problem there) but requires a lot of training and practice to make the removal of the thumb safety second nature during a high stress confrontation ( more than one expert has attempted to pull the trigger only to find nothing happens).

Most people don't have the time, money, training or oppertunity to learn the 1911 to make it an effective carry gun.
 
Ya make your choice, you pay your money. Good belt and holster trump pistol selection for carrying.

All platforms have pluses and minuses. That said I carry a full-sized 1911. I like: thin grips for control and concealability, the weapon is flat, the mags are easier to handle, the mags are flat, the weapon is easier to manipulate with one hand, the weapon is heavy and soaks up recoil, the weapon is big.

I've been carrying for twenty years now. Dig the 1911 but that is what I was "brought up" on and skuled with at first. Lots of good guns out there.

Lots of guys get all hung up on the magic sword as if the sword is some sort of talisman or think that if they have a "cool gun" that means they are cool. Pistol is a (small) factor but certainly not controlling. Get a good gun, get one just like it, get a lot of mags for them, get to skul. HTH.
 
"Perfect" is a highly subjective term, but the 1911 certainly has a lot going for it. I like 1911s for all the reasons mentioned already: flat design, easy to carry IWB, excellent trigger, serious caliber, flat magazines, easy to shoot, and easy to operate with one hand if needed. It's not the magic sword, but the sum of its good features makes it a pretty darn efficient fighting tool.

It does, however, require a good bit of training and practice to get the msot out of the 1911 design. It's not for people who are not willing or able to train to use it properly and maximize its strong points.
 
A carry gun is reliable, smallish and as safe and simple to carry and fire as possible.


So is a large, steel pistol with a manual safety ideal?

Is a design that varies greatly from model to model and manufacturer to manufacturer "reliable"? Sometimes yes, othertimes not so much. The variation is so great that the gun needs to be test fired extensively before it is declared a good one.


On the other hand, many people would be comfortable buying a Sig (for instance), loading it and shoving it immediately into a holster, or even a waistband. The gun would carry lighter, be almost 100% reliable from the first shot on, and fire with just a pull of the trigger.


There are lots of different "ideals", and the 1911 fits for some tasks (Swat use, IPSC, etc.), but are you sure about this one? It's narrow than some, but wider and squarer than many others. It's full of sharp edges.

If you purpose is to draw and fire .45 bullets at someone 7 yards or less away, what is the general 1911 doing better than a Glock 30, Sig 245, or even a Bersa?
 
I don't know if there is an ideal carry gun... I've been shooting 1911s ever since I've been shooting anything. I never fail to engage the grip safety and can't think of a time when I drew and forgot to thumb off the thumb safety. Having said that, I'd rather the grip safety not be present though I've never had the desire to pin one. The only advantage I think it has on a modern firearm is that it ensures adequate grip pressure. I assume this is why a quasi-grip safety is present on the Smith & Wesson 952.

It also might be a bit heavier than the ideal pistol would be for concealed carry. I think about 24-28 Oz or so would be a better goal.

I have complete faith in the 45ACP round and believe that 8 or 9 rounds is sufficient, for a civilian anyway (no flame intended, just going by statistics).

I think something like the Springfield Armory Compact or the Brian Bilby Special of a Commander-length slide on an Officer frame is about the ideal carry weapon. Night sight (front at least) with a Novak-type rear, a modest meltdown just to get rid of any sharp edges, and reliability job, 4 lb trigger, plunger adjusted, Aftec extractor, smooth G10 or linen micarta grips and a tuckable IWB holster is about the ideal carry setup, along with at least two magazines, probably Wilsons with rounded followers loaded with Ranger +P 230 Gr ammo. And a training class or two along with a couple hundred rounds a month use and you should be good to go.
 
So is a large, steel pistol with a manual safety ideal?
Well, it can be (size anyway). It is long but IWB that can easily hide away and it give you a full sight radius. For those who really want something shorter, 1911 platforms are available in 3", 3.5" and 4" barrels from just about everyone who makes 1911s. If weight is an issue, there is always aluminum alloy (some 1911s are down to 24 or 25oz). As far as width there really aren't many options out there that are smaller, even in compact pistols. The safety issue is one reason I was thinking DAO or DA/SA and just decocking it (not so much due to the safety but because I plan to primarily carry a revolver and sometimes trade off w/ an auto and I'm concerned w/ a consistent manual of arms). Unfortunately, if I go 1911 I'd probably have to make it the primary and only occasionally go w/ a revolver, but w/out that issue I don't see why one couldn't address the safety "issue" with training (which one should do regardless of platform anyway).

Is a design that varies greatly from model to model and manufacturer to manufacturer "reliable"?
Well, with any gun, especially any auto, one needs to really test it out before relying on it for self defense since even the most reputable companies can make lemons. My Charles Daly, a make with somewhat more lemons than average, has been extremely reliable and I DO trust it for home defense duties already (it alternates w/ my CZs as backup to my revolvers) so I'd have no qualms about its reliability for carry. I don't see why this means one needs more testing w/ a 1911 than another option as SIG, HK, Kimber and SA are all on a similiar quality level. If you were really worried about this and wanted a 1911 you should simply go with a Kimber, SA or something comprable.


All

Several people did mention the training issue w/ a 1911. The way I see it, training is important regardless of platform. If I can find a class that doesn't conflict with the sabbath (the Jewish sabbath is Fri evening to Sat evening) I hope to go to SIGArms Academy or someplace similar this summer, I assume there are classes offered during the week (heck, a week long course would probably be ideal). If not I will seek out a more local self defense oriented course. I certainly plan to get some professional training this summer and I plan to make it an ongoing effort into the future as well.

cratz2

It also might be a bit heavier than the ideal pistol would be for concealed carry. I think about 24-28 Oz or so would be a better goal.

To me the absolutely perfect 1911 for carry would be one of the 4" Kimber CDPs. "Melted" treatment, aluminum alloy frame, carry instead of competition based "options", etc. And right in your weight standards. Maybe one of the other aluminum framed Kimber or SA options would be better simply due to the rather high price of the CDPs.
 
A carry gun should be as mechanically reliable as possible, and 1911s certainly can be made that.

A carry gun should be easy to shoot accurately and rapidly. The 1911s very good single-action trigger, large size, and overall ergonomics make for a very easy-to-handle package. Most popular carry guns, IMO, are too small to shoot well. Decent triggers are also the exception rather than the rule.

In my three years of daily carry of an SA auto, I have not once failed to hit the safety during training, competition, or administrative handling. Hitting the safety is not an issue with even a modicum of training.

Now that all said, I don't prefer the 1911. Good guns, but not for me. However, without a doubt, the 1911 will do if you will do.

If you handle and shoot the 1911 better than other guns, then carry it. If not, then pick something else that you shoot better. :D

- Chris
 
by chaim
Is the 1911 the perfect auto design for a carry gun?

Short answer, yes. Less than an inch thick and shoots a .45. Ultimate carry gun as far as I am concerned is a LW Commander in .45. Very happy with mine. Slim, light, reliable, and makes big holes, what more do you want?
 
I think the 1911 is too large, too heavy, too limited by a 7/8 round mag, and the hammer and grip safety are snag points.

A Glock 27 or 33 with a +1 Pierce mag extension will hold 10 rounds of .40 or 357SIG, has no snag points, is lighter, and much smaller.

Indeed, "perfect" is very subjective.
 
The full size 1911 is the perfect carry gun....until Glock comes out with a full size 10mm single stack slim line.
 
I carry a Springfield Amory Loaded Operator on a daily basis. Its concealed in a OWB holster under a button up shirt. The weight doesnt bother me and I feel extremely confident carrying a full size firearm.

I dont believe mag capacity is a big issue. I carry Wilson Combat 8rnd mags. That means 8 in the mag and one in the chamber. I also carry two extra 8 rnd mags in a alessi mag pouch. Thats a total of 25rnds of .45. How many rounds do you have on you?
 
Most people don't have the time, money, training or oppertunity to learn the 1911 to make it an effective carry gun.


If you dont have the time and money to train you shouldnt be taking on the responsability of carrying a deadly weapon on you.
 
How many rounds do you have on you?
Well, if I could carry then I would carry my Glock 17 with my +2 extensions. With one round loaded, that's 20 rounds ready to go...don't need any extra mags.
 
Yeah but thats 20 rounds of 9mm. The same 9mm that the FBI found to bounce of car windshields.
 
chaim,

You sound like you really like the 1911 platform. It's generally a love it or hate it prospect. Personally, I love it and if I carry a different full size gun, it will be a revolver.

I have decided to standardize on .45ACP and .38/.357 for defense. So when I move to CCW land, it will be the 1911 and the J frame.

Whatever gun you get, you need to be 100% confident in it. I had a Colt Defender (3" AL frame) and it was a nice package, but I just could never trust it enough - even after I had it ruinning pretty well.

Lots of people that probably know say stay with 4" or 5" 1911s and if yours is not reliable, get one that it.

That said, me and the other Valtro owners are just head over heels in love with the gun. Mine never chokes and I have as much confidence in it as I will ever have in any gun.

I say don't listen to the nay sayers - do your dry practice, your practice draws, etc and just own it. I used to carry a BHP clone and while I did not have any formal training, the one thing I did do was dry practice - draw, align, swipe, click, etc. When I did finally have to draw it one night, everyting was automatic - because practice makes permanent.

Carry your 1911, enjoy it, enjoy the mythology and the history -its definately part of what makes it the best auto pistol ever designed.

Oh, and for the people who are nervous about 8+1, I would just ask: how much missing do you plan to do? ;)
 
Hey,Tejon......

I thought that my old 1911, the one I call Excalibre, would make the ideal companion on my quest to re-unite the land. Am I wrong?
 
For me it is. Most of the people that complain about the size/weight haven't tried it in a quality holster and belt rig. Once you do, you can carry a bonafide horse pistol concealed in all weather, all day. Pretty sweet.
 
Quoting El T:
Lots of guys get all hung up on the magic sword as if the sword is some sort of talisman or think that if they have a "cool gun" that means they are cool. Pistol is a (small) factor but certainly not controlling. Get a good gun, get one just like it, get a lot of mags for them, get to skul. HTH.

And there in lies the magic. Changing platforms causes your brain to fart at the worst times. I only shoot 1911 style weapons. No two of mine are the same manufacture. But they all have the same controls, trigger, and sight picture.

Find a gun, any gun, that you are comfortable with and have the utmost faith in. Buy another one just like it, or as close as possible. Get training, practice, get more training, more practice. Stick with the platform you have chosen.
 
Sounds like you got it all worked out chaim. Its been a perfect carry gun for me for around 19 yrs now, virtually daily.

My observations are, you're going to want to forgo the Uncle Mikes holster pretty quick. The nylon or whatever breaks down and doesn't afford the support required for a 39 oz gun. Go with leather.

I challenge the statement that having to disengage the safety makes it slower into action over a DA auto. Releasing the safety is part of the draw and is second nature after 5000 practice draws in the comfort of your own home. Mine is released automatically as the gun comes up from the draw at about a 45 deg angle to target.

In my three years of daily carry of an SA auto, I have not once failed to hit the safety during training, competition, or administrative handling. Hitting the safety is not an issue with even a modicum of training.

This has been true for me also albeit 19 yrs. On the DA/SA consideration, I watched a guy at the range practicing double taps with a Sig 220 from the holster at about 5 yds repeatedly put the first two rounds within 2" of each other COM on the target. So if thats the way you wind up going, training will get you there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top