Speedo66
Member
I also panicked with my Corona purchase, I forgot the limes.
Good luck with the Wrangler!
Good luck with the Wrangler!
Mine is very accurate. The ONLY criticism I've heard, looking at the meat of the cylinder, is that they 'could' have made it a 8 shot..But really like mine. Perfect first gun for grand daughters when they are old enough to got shooting with me.Funny you should say that. Just leaving the house right now with my dad to go get him one too.
I like the non indexing cylinder. I hate it when I go too far on one and have to spin the cylinder all the way around.
It’s a heck of a little pea shooter. I’ve done all the reading up on it that I can and haven’t found anyone saying anything bad about it. The only complaint is that some say it shoots low. If that’s the case, it’s nothing a couple of passes on the front sight with a file can’t fix.
Same here.Mine is very accurate. The ONLY criticism I've heard, looking at the meat of the cylinder, is that they 'could' have made it a 8 shot..But really like mine. Perfect first gun for grand daughters when they are old enough to got shooting with me.
You didn’t mention the 22 mag cylinder forheritage makes a nice cheap 22lr/wmr single action roughrider revolver with which to teach your children.
ruger makes a nice inexpensive 22lr single single action wrangler revolver for your children to teach their unborn children.
i observe the wuhan flu (yes, i’m un-p.c.) induced gun panic buying, by our liberal countrymen no less, from my well stocked, socially distanced (yes, i’m a contented lone eagle) perch. imho gun newbies would be best off getting a 22 single action revolver. in fact the roughrider’s safety probably makes it their better choice, and leaves the wranglers on the lgs shelves for us.
Same here.
When I first walked past one of these at a gun show, I was quite surprised that it was NOT an 8 shot.
I wonder, if Ruger doesn't, will someone else come up with an 8 or more round cylinder with the proper additional parts to cycle it correctly?
Todd.
You didn’t mention the 22 mag cylinder for
The HRR and that leaves it cheaper than the RW with more capability... at least on paper. Most people never shoot the mag cylinders which is a shame as every convertible gun I have ever had shot better with 22 mags.
There ya go.im wondering if these guys will step up? http://www.brcrifles.com/manufacture.htm
my 5.5” ruger single six is actually a single eight. it came to me used and value priced, but missing its 22wmr cylinder. i got borchardt’s eight shot replacement from midway for $120. after $20 of gunsmith polishing (i don’t diy much when it comes to firearm mechanics) and 100 break in rounds, this piece shoots 22wmr like a laser.
There ya go.
If they do, it'll be interesting to hear the ninnies whine about the cost of the conversion relative to the low cost of the revolver all the while ignoring the upgrade aspect - if one deems it as an upgrade.
Is there room in a Wrangler frame for a WMR cylinder, I wonder. WKentucky above points out the advantage of the HRR in that respect.
Todd.
Wow. How do they make a profit?
Too funny... the old *make it up in volume* line.They're losing $20 on each gun, they must make it up on the volume.
Same here.
When I first walked past one of these at a gun show, I was quite surprised that it was NOT an 8 shot.
I wonder, if Ruger doesn't, will someone else come up with an 8 or more round cylinder with the proper additional parts to cycle it correctly?
Todd.
They don't.Wow. How do they make a profit?
Ruger
It would almost have to be a Heritage. Dealer cost on the Wrangler is $155 and most distributors have them allocated, so I don't see any way any dealers are getting a deal where they could sell for $149That is a heck of a deal. Are you sure those weren’t HRR guns? That’s more in line with what they sell for. I would have bought three for that price if they were Rugers. One for me and one each for my two sons.
Same here.
When I first walked past one of these at a gun show, I was quite surprised that it was NOT an 8 shot.
I wonder, if Ruger doesn't, will someone else come up with an 8 or more round cylinder with the proper additional parts to cycle it correctly?
Todd.
I certainly get that point of view too.At this current time, I'm glad that they are only six shot. Would like to train granddaughters on these. The one, fine. The other, ...well... let's just say that I would prefer a slower pace. That one is a little impetuous.
I agree Todd. Loading less is nice, but slowing down a little for reloading is not all bad either. Reloading gives the gun a little time to cool down and the shooter more time to look at accuracy.I certainly get that point of view too.
I had a 10 shot revolver once. While I can't really put my finger on it.... 10 seemed somehow, a bit much.
Todd.
Even in autos, I find that I generally fill nothing over a 7 rounder.I agree Todd. Loading less is nice, but slowing down a little for reloading is not all bad either. Reloading gives the gun a little time to cool down and the shooter more time to look at accuracy.
Part of the reason why I like shooting my revolvers more than my semiautomatics.
You save a little money tooEven in autos, I find that I generally fill nothing over a 7 rounder.
I too, like the breaks.
Todd.