I'm entitled to my opinion.
You are entitled to your opinion, particularly about shooting styles. Whether it is worth anything is a separate issue but I digress. I'm curious as to how you have decided that your style is better, but I don't want to drive this thread further off topic. You remind me of the guy on the second season of top shot that just knew his cup and saucer pistol grip was better for him than anything any of the accomplished and very proficient pistol shooters could possibly show him.
You are even entitled to your opinion about whether a person is a "fatty" (of course it would help to know whether the person is actually fat or not). There is a difference between being entitled to your opinion and being entitled to go around acting like a child calling names and disrespecting people and not having anyone call you on it.
I didn't attack a member, so you probably should relax.
How do you know Mr. Vickers is not a member here? Further Vickers is a guy I'm certain more than just a couple people here either know or have dealt with so don't be surprised if people are annoyed with you, for no apparent reason I'll add, disparaging him.
I'm sure he's quite knowledgable, I watch his stuff as much as time allows.
You must watch very very very little of Vickers "stuff." He lost the weight probably a year ago at least. Often people that spout off are not
au courant, so no surprise I guess.
No one took you to task for shooting differently than he does. If your way worked best people would be all over it, instead of the way pretty much all top shooters shoot. They took you to task for needlessly attacking a good guy, and doing so on the basis of something that is not even true.
But, my observation is my business.
It ceases to just be "your business" when you post it on a public forum. Further, I'd point out again the outdated observation is not the issue, its your classes conduct.
Pretty hard to ban me, with no rule broken.
I would say it falls under the catch all of "contrary to the above policies, or to the mission of The High Road . . ." Moreover, the rule prohibiting personal attacks has nothing in it that limits it to a member who is a party to the thread, or to members at all. It would seem axiomatic that going out of your way to call a guy like Vickers a name is not appropriate here. I guess not.
The comment about his weight was off topic, but I think I've covered that already.
And in all that "covering" it there was glaringly no apology for needlessly being very rudely towards someone who deserves a little respect. Interesting, and rather telling.