HankB
Member
Lawful CCW and dealing with "ANTI" Businesses
This story is similar to the San Antonio "Applebee's" thread from last year, where business pressures made a local franchise end it's policy of prohibiting carrying of firearms by persons holding concealed handgun licenses.
I recently made a business trip to Minnesota, which last year passed "shall issue" CCW legislation. (No reciprocity with Texas yet, so I wasn't actually carrying.) When I met up with a couple of colleagues, we went by the hotel restaurant, where a sign said they " . . . banned guns on these premesis."
It was explained to me that this was the Minnesota equivalent of Texas' PC30.06 signs, so we honored their policy and went elsewhere for dinner.
Next morning, at the breakfast buffet near the pool, I encountered the hotel manager and courteously let him know I was made to feel MOST unwelcome by the restaurant's sign, but I and my colleagues had honored it by dining elsewhere . . . and that in the future, I'd most likely STAY elsewhere, too.
He was most courteous, very receptive to my viewpoint (we discussed CCW, licensing, the fact that people with licenses are certified "good guys" and so forth and so on) and he told me that he'd make it his business that day to have the sign removed. And that he'd already been considering it.
It was gone by that afternoon!
In a similar vein, my buddies informed me that a nearby restaurant had also posted signs against licensed CCW . . . but after several of them had complained to the manager there (and passed out little business cards that basically said "no guns = no $$$") those signs came down, too.
Lesson: Unless the business owner is RABIDLY "anti" . . . sometimes all it takes to have a sign removed is to point out the good business reasons for NOT banning lawful carry.
This story is similar to the San Antonio "Applebee's" thread from last year, where business pressures made a local franchise end it's policy of prohibiting carrying of firearms by persons holding concealed handgun licenses.
I recently made a business trip to Minnesota, which last year passed "shall issue" CCW legislation. (No reciprocity with Texas yet, so I wasn't actually carrying.) When I met up with a couple of colleagues, we went by the hotel restaurant, where a sign said they " . . . banned guns on these premesis."
It was explained to me that this was the Minnesota equivalent of Texas' PC30.06 signs, so we honored their policy and went elsewhere for dinner.
Next morning, at the breakfast buffet near the pool, I encountered the hotel manager and courteously let him know I was made to feel MOST unwelcome by the restaurant's sign, but I and my colleagues had honored it by dining elsewhere . . . and that in the future, I'd most likely STAY elsewhere, too.
He was most courteous, very receptive to my viewpoint (we discussed CCW, licensing, the fact that people with licenses are certified "good guys" and so forth and so on) and he told me that he'd make it his business that day to have the sign removed. And that he'd already been considering it.
It was gone by that afternoon!
In a similar vein, my buddies informed me that a nearby restaurant had also posted signs against licensed CCW . . . but after several of them had complained to the manager there (and passed out little business cards that basically said "no guns = no $$$") those signs came down, too.
Lesson: Unless the business owner is RABIDLY "anti" . . . sometimes all it takes to have a sign removed is to point out the good business reasons for NOT banning lawful carry.
Last edited: