DM~
Member
Wasn't a bunch of investors & nobody bought the name.
Denis
I was referring to Winchester and some "others" when I made that comment...
DM
Wasn't a bunch of investors & nobody bought the name.
Denis
can't speak for the others but I wouldn't touch a new Henry out of principle - it's not really a Henry and I don't like the loading method
I can't speak for the others but I wouldn't touch a new Henry out of principle - it's not really a Henry and
Really, did you miss this page???I keep seeing references of this sort, but don't quite understand them. I've looked the website over several times and never can find where the current Henry company claims a connection to the original.
No, I didn't miss that page. I just understood it to be about the history of the original Henry company, hence the page title "Henry History". That page seems to be about the original company while the page, "Henry Today" is about the current company. I guess it could be taken either way, kinda like the glass half full concept, but I never took it to be a claim to any link other than the name, which is a simple marketing tactic. Either way, I commend their efforts to keep jobs in the US and to promoting the shooting sports.Really, did you miss this page???
To be fair, all tube-fed .22's are like that.Does not need to be removed for loading but a PITA for cease fires at my range. Tubes need to be empty and action open.