Looking for a .22 pistol "budget"

Status
Not open for further replies.

chetrogers

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
515
Location
Oregon
I have not fired a firearm in over 7 years. I really want to get back into it. I had a stroke 3 years ago, and I want to start everything from scratch. I am thinking of going to some classes just to get back on track. I have a .45 that I have for home protection, but like i said, I haven't shot it in a long time. I am also thinking of joining a local gun club. I don't really want to use my .45 for training, even though it would work. I am thinking of buying a .22 pistol for plinking and something that would be cheap to practice with. I don't really mind if its a revolver or a auto. I do want at least 8 shots though. The kicker is though I dont want to spend over $400 dollars. Must be a new firearm. My question is can anyone suggest what firearm i should be checking out. The Ruger Mark 3 looks good, but I have heard that is is hard to clean. Thanks for your time and for any suggestions.
 
You may be able to find a .22 heritage revolver for around that price and have money left over for a bunch of ammo. The only reason I recommend the revolver is because of the stroke, my uncle had a stroke and lost 90% of the function of his left hand so it was nearly impossible for him to operate a slide on a semi auto. He did the same thing as you after his stroke and now carries a .357 magnum for daily carry.
 
The Ruger take-down is a 'rite of passage' for gun owners. Now with YouTube, it is a lot easier to do correctly. But you can clean either the buckmark or the ruger wtih a patchworm for the most part and limit the field strip to once a year or so depending on how much you shoot.
 
Is your 45 a 1911? Why not consider a 22 conversion for that? About $300. Then you would be getting trigger time on your primary weapon. Just a thought.
 
Don't overlook the Ruger SR22.
It's a good shooting easy to maintain little pistol with great ergonomics.
Weighs around 16 ounces unloaded which is less than the true semi auto target pistols.
I am very happy with mine.
 
Another vote for the SR-22 Ruger.

Other good choices in that price range include the Bersa Thunder 22, the ISSC .22 (looks like a Glock, but has a hammer-fired mechanism), and pretty much any other Ruger (Mk-III, 22/45, etc.)

A CZ Cadet (discontinued, but still commonly-available) runs right around the top of your price range. At the bottom is the Phoenix HP22A, a fun and dandy little plinker, but not really "gun club" material.

Revolver options include the already-mentioned Heritage Rough Rider, though it is most-often found with only a six-shot cylinder (but, hey, it also frequently comes with another one in .22WMR!) Another decent revolver option is the Taurus M94. Charter Arms makes a quite-handsome version of their venerable Pathfinder called the Target Pathfinder, but, like the HRR, it does hold only six rounds in its cylinder.

Guys, what's a S&W M&P22 going for these days?
 
Guys, what's a S&W M&P22 going for these days?
Probably can be found a little cheaper these days?, but on 10-13 I paid $374 for mine (does not include taxes).
 
Another vote for the SR. 22. I have all the .22 pistols I need 7 or 8 maybe. I was at my LGS 2 weeks with my 30 years old daughter,she liked the SR22 . $300 out the door with 333 rounds. The little gun punches way over it's weight. A neat little piece.
 
The $400 cap on the budget puts some restrictions on your choices. Not a lot but it does limit it somewhat. And I'm guessing that if we could keep the price lower that you won't complain, right?

You said that you don't mind the idea of a revolver. But I think you'll find that your budget and your insistence on 8 rounds minimum limits your choices.

The three main semi auto handguns for .22 shooting would be the Ruger MkIII or 22/45, the Browning Buckmark and the S&W 22a. We don't hear a lot about the 22a in threads similar to this but it's one of those guns that shoots well, seems to be very reliable for those that own them but for some reason doesn't get a whole lot of internet respect. But they are worth looking at.

The Ruger isn't HARD to clean. It's just a little tricky until you learn the order of the steps. But once you've done it a few times it's actually faster and easier to field strip than the other popular guns. But you need to work on learning the correct order before you get to where you can do the job with your eyes closed.

It's actually far less work to strip for cleaning than most of my other .22 semi auto pistols and only "just" as easy as the easiest other one I've got.

For out of the box performance where you don't want to mess around with aftermarket parts or tinkering with the insides I'd suggest the Browning Buckmark. The STOCK trigger is enough nicer than the STOCK Ruger trigger to justify this. So if you simply want to buy and shoot with no tinkering other than cleaning I'd have to say go with the Browning.

Truth be told I liked the rental 22a that I shot for about 500 rounds. I rented it and used it as a flinch buster gun between magazines of 9mm. It shot well with good accuracy (better than me :D) and worked with a variety of ammo. Being a rental gun it got used lots and cleaned seldom. I was enough of a regular at the range that when the staff was busy one day and I wanted to get the gun working that they took me out in back to clean the gun myself. The 22A was easy enough to strip and clean and re-assemble. The trigger was nice on this well used and therefore well broken in example but it wasn't as nice as the trigger of the Browning. But it was at least as good as the triggers on the stock Ruger I've got.

If you like the idea of a 1911 the GSG gun is worth consideration as well. The trigger isn't as nice as the other three options in stock form. But it's a 1911 setup so it's easy to get it slicked up either by doing it yourself or having a 1911 smith do the work. Mind you that may take it out of your budget.

For 8 or more shot revolvers you'll need to decide if you want DA or SA. The folks I know that are recovering from strokes have SOME effect even on the supposedly unaffected side. So being able to operate the gun in DA with good control over the sight picture will need to be addressed by you and based on your own condition.

But in SA mode they all work really nicely. But one of the nicest guns, the Ruger Single 10, is over your budget. But not by much. For classic bullseye shooting it's an option that might just tickle your fancy. And really over the next few years of use the extra cost to buy whichever gun you really like won't amount to a hill of beans. So don't get locked in TOO strongly if you see something that is over but only by a little.
 
Hi
I bought a Taurus 22 4" revolver 3 years ago. Hold 9 cartridges. Has been a very reliable and fun gun to shoot. Priced right also. I know a lot of people bash Taurus, but honestly no probs at all with this gun.
 
Beretta Neos can be found for $250 used, is super easy to clean, and mine has been 100% reliable.

H&R 929 revolvers can be found for 100.
 
Maybe consider a Beretta Neos. Can get one for around $250 and it's very easy to shoot and maintain. Magazines are well made and are easy to load too.
 
Consensus as to what is the best around $400 through opinions .Not likely.
I`d suggest you try your local Gun shop, Bass Pro ,what ever and see how they "feel" in your hand. How they look.
What I like does not automaticity equate into a weapon you might like. Good luck.
 
I was at Cabela's the other day an saw the Neos at $269 nib. I like mine and am considering a second. Easy to maintain and more accurate than I am with a .22 (for some reason I shoot better with my .45).
 
Another +1 here for the Beretta Neos - it's a good gun for a good price. Very easy to disassemble/reassemble. I have the 6" blued version and it has been reliable and accurate. I added a reflex sight.
 
You can buy a really nice Ruger 22/45 Target with bull barrel and adjustable sights for well under $300. I own the target model as well as the model with rails top and bottom and threaded barrel.

I don't think you can beat the Ruger in the price range discussed. I don't have any trouble disassembling and reassembling my 22/45s, but then, I do pride myself in having "walking-about" sense. ;)

IMG_20140219_095521_zpss9z43w27.jpg

IMG_20131019_134416_zps35f1d5b0.jpg
 
About the Beretta NEOS,,,

Beretta Neos can be found for $250 used, is super easy to clean, and mine has been 100% reliable.

I agree with everything but the price.

budsgunshop dot com has new Beretta NEOS in 4.5" or 6" for $248.00

If you can handle the smallish grip it's a wonderful pistol.

Aarond

.
 
Can't go wrong with a Ruger SR-22 or the 22-45....I have both ,for plinking I prefer the SR-22......A S&W model 63 kit gun is great too or the Ruger SP-101 in .22 but both of these are a bit more expensive.........
 
I appreciate all the suggestions and so far like most people have I am leaning towards to the Ruger SR-22. I like that if i get one it will be close to my other firearm. I need to practice with something that will be like what im going to shoot with other pistols. The 22-45 might handle better and have less recoil, but i need to train with something that will show me closer to the real cartridges :).

I Know that the rimfires are going to be dirty and know that no mater what i get im going to get some FTF's, FTE, etc, but is the SR-22 going comparable with the 22-45 with miss fires etc. Thanks again for all the suggestions, and would love to hear more about the original question if anyone has any more suggestions.
 
I have seen the Beretta Neos for as little as $239 (New) recently. I have had mine for a few years and would do it again.
 
Chetrogers..
My SR22 is really reliable.
After winning one on a GunBroker auction I cleaned and lubed mine and set around racking the slide about 250 times and then took it down and relubed the slides.
I took seven brands of .22 lr which was a total of 320 rounds and this included a box of Federal Lightnings I bought in early 1992.
The first few CCI would not cycle.
I then started shooting the other brands.
After about 100 rounds I switched back to the mini mags and all was fine.
At the end of the shooting session of those 320 rounds 2 of the Federal Value pack did not eject and 1 Federal Lightning did not eject.
I was impressed.
It loved the Aguilas Super Extra 38 gr. and the Winchester M-22.
And the CCI once it had the first 100 rounds of other ammo run through it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top