I am not a trophy hunter but I am still confused about the problems with 'trophy' hunting. It is against the law to shoot animals just for the antlers and to let the meat go to waste. Even those hunters who pursue 'trophies' eat the meat or make sure it is donated to someone who will. Those that don't are lawbreakers and not members of the real hunting community. When caught, they can be subject to heavy fines and adverse publicity.
Somewhere out there, anti-hunting groups are spreading the message that my above statements are not correct. And a whole lot of folks seem to believe that nonsense.
This is just my personal opinion but...
I hear a lot of "hunting folks" that share their "love of nature" as an integral part of the
hunting experience... all the while... intending to kill or destroy a portion of that nature.
I am sure many are able to separate the two, but to me personally, this seems a little hypocritical.
Kind of hard for me to say that I cherish the rainforests, but work as a logger. Easy for me to say that I enjoy "sitting amongst them in the early morning"... but then participate in their demise
I also don't understand the "thrill" of using an advanced rifle with optics and "long-range" capabilities as some form of "conquering nature". If my family needed the nourishment I wouldn't blink... but I hardly think that is the case here on THR with those of us that have computers and internet access.
I don't have any problems with killing of varmint, or overpopulated species that effect other natural resources, etc.
I just do not find any enjoyment in killing something that does not NEED to be killed.
I don't see how a creature that has fought and survived nature and all it's obstacles, deserves to hang on my wall dead as some "trophy" to me and my advanced tools
You hunt me, man or beast, I'll kill ya best I can... otherwise live and let live... but that's just me.