1. CheaperI am working on laying in a retirement ammo supply. Looking to make a bulk purchase soon. I know that some shooters prefer non-jacketed lead bullets over FMJ , but I do not know why. I would be pleased to hear opinions on the pros and cons of the two different bullet types.
'Ski
Leading is more a function of lubrication than anything else. Two very easy and effective "lubricants" are liquid Alox and powder coating.Don't hold me to this, but I think you may start to get leading up around 1000 fps with lead bullets.
.
Actually wrong, soft lead can be driven to 1400+fps without leading, if proper lube is used, and alloyed with linotype can be driven to 2200+fps with proper lube, both with little to no leading depending on roughness of the barrel. I've been casting and reloading for 30+ yrs and I also fire lap ALL my guns using the LBT method. Since I found his fire lapping I've rarely seen any leading in any of my guns and most of my bullets are casted by me, from soft for B/P to almost pure linotype for rifle and rifle caliber pistols. I have some plated and jacketed bullets for my son's H&K that doesn't do lead so well.Howdy Again
The purpose of jacketed bullets is they can be driven at higher velocities without needing a bullet lubricant. Lead bullets will reach a certain velocity, I don't remember exactly how fast, when the heat of friction of the bullet against the barrel will cause the lead to soften. This can cause leading as the softened lead fuses to the barrel. Jacketed bullets can be driven faster because the copper jacket melts at a higher temperature than lead. The copper itself is slippery enough to serve as its own lubricant, so jacketed bullets will not heat up as much, and can be driven at a higher velocity than lead bullets, without any leading.
Most of my revolvers are pretty old, I never load jacketed bullets for them because I have no need to drive bullets that fast.
Exactly what do you mean by 'the areas of escaping gasses'?