M629-2 $975 (ouch)

This was my understanding....and I may very well be wrong. That 44 Mag chamber pressures were lowered by SAAMI(somewhere around 1995)from 43,500 CUP to the current 36,000 psi, which was a realistic 10% reduction, not just a different type of measure. Similar to the change from 46,000 CUP to 35,000 psi in .357. Not only just a change in the way pressure was measured, but also a real reduction in chamber pressure(even more than with .44mag). This had to do with K-Frame S&Ws not holding up well. These changes not only helped the longevity of S&W revolvers, but every other revolver on the market too.....including Ruger. I believe this was something told to me by a retired gunsmith from another forum.

But in either cartridges that change from crusher to transducer does NOT result in a change of actual pressure.

If you have a pressure barrel that was instrumented with both a crusher and transducer measurement system and loaded a 44 Magnum cartridge that produces 40,000 CUP (Crusher) then we would expect a measurement of ~36,000 PSI (transducer) on the transducer system. This relationship is only true for 44 Magnum. Another cartridge would produce a different relationship between the two measurement systems.

For all the examples I gave above if you had a duel sensor pressure barrel and loaded it with a cartridge that produce the max pressure for one measurement system we would expect a measurement very close to the Max value listed for the other system.

I have photo copies of SAAMI specs going back to 1993 for the 357 Magnum and the pressure values did not change. I am still looking for copies of the SAAMI spec that pre-date 1993 but so far no one has shown me consecutive SAAMI publications that have changed the pressure for an established cartridge.

ETA when you mix in Europe's CIP values that use another different way to measure peak pressure and things are a mess unless you really know where the data is coming from and how it was measured.
 
Last edited:
If you have a pressure barrel that was instrumented with both a crusher and transducer measurement system and loaded a 44 Magnum cartridge that produces 40,000 CUP (Crusher) then we would expect a measurement of ~36,000 PSI (transducer) on the transducer system. This relationship is only true for 44 Magnum. Another cartridge would produce a different relationship between the two measurement systems.

The standard formula for converting CUP to PSI is to multiply the CUP by 1.516, then subtract 17902.

40,000 X 1.516 = 60,640

60,640 - 17902 = 42,738

....am I missing something or just corn-fused?
 
The standard formula for converting CUP to PSI is to multiply the CUP by 1.516, then subtract 17902.

40,000 X 1.516 = 60,640

60,640 - 17902 = 42,738

....am I missing something or just corn-fused?
That formula is simply a linear fit to a bunch of SAAMI MAP (Maximum Allowable Pressures) CUP and MAP Trans pressure data and though an accurate representation of the general trend on which the fit was applied it can lead to some very dangerous results when we look at specific cartridges.

There is no conversion from LUP/CUP to transduce PSI that works across all cartridges. For any one specific cartridge we can, in theory create a good reliable conversion but that will not be the same mathematical formula for a different cartridge. This is due to how the two measurement systems works making a general one for one conversion not possible.***

Quoting SAAMI (https://saami.org/faqs/#lup-cup-psi-preassures):
This is important, since the pressure values determined by one method cannot be mathematically converted to values for another, despite claims to the contrary. Likewise, the limiting pressure values for the different systems are not interchangeable.

Try this yourself download the SAAMI spec (https://saami.org/technical-information/ansi-saami-standards/) and use that formula to convert MAP CUP to MAP PSI on a cartridge at random. Some of the time (especially for rifle cartridges) the formula work acceptably well. Some of the time the results are down right dangerous and there is no way to predict which cartridge the formula works on without already knowing both values.

7mm Rem Mag has a .1% error using the formula.

Try it with 32 S&W and the 12,000 MAP CUP is converted to only 290 PSI for the transducer. Actual transducer it 17,000 psi A safe, but 98% error.

Try that with 357 Magnum and the 45,000 MAP CUP is converted to 50,300 PSI for the transducer. Actual transducer is 35,000 psi A very dangerous 44% overpressure.

Even with our topic at hand of 44 Magnum. the 40,000 MAP CUP is converted to 42,700 PSI for the transducer. Actual transducer is 36,000 psi A 19% overpressure, or nearly shooting proof loads.

***If you're curious on the difference in the method I would point you to this post I did awhile ago that goes into the four major testing methods used (SAAMI CUP/LUP, SAAMI Transducer, CIP (Europe's equivalent to SAAMI), NATO EPVAT) and I think that will give you some insight into why there cannon be a conversion between CUP/LUP and Transducer. (box below will take you to my post in an old thread.)

Remember the whole pressure event happens on the order of .002 seconds or less (2 milliseconds) and the peak pressure is experienced for a very small fraction of a millisecond. Even with modern computers (they sample the pressure at ~1,000,000 times a second during a test), high tech piezo sensors, and well trained technicians this is a fairly difficult measurement to make accurately despite it being done daily by dozens of ammunition manufacturers. Any mistake in the setup leads to serous errors and very small factors can have big effects on the measurements.
 
Last edited:
It's a prelock Smith. Most are around $800-$1000+. A NIB 629 with the lock is $1000+, and those are less desirable by many vs a prelock.
someone put it in hold before I could get there. So $975 was a good price then
 
That first production of 629's was neat.....pinned/recessed et al, but at about that point Smith had begun to let it's quality control slip.........had mine back to the factory several times, ranging from bbl index to an off center bbl.................believe it or not they solved that one by bending the frame! Really nice if you got a good one, but a real disappointment if not. I will give it this, mine'll hold very tight groups with Elmer's old top end .44 spl load.
 
That first production of 629's was neat.....pinned/recessed et al, but at about that point Smith had begun to let it's quality control slip.........had mine back to the factory several times, ranging from bbl index to an off center bbl.................believe it or not they solved that one by bending the frame! Really nice if you got a good one, but a real disappointment if not. I will give it this, mine'll hold very tight groups with Elmer's old top end .44 spl load.
I put many hot Keith bullets over 21 grains of 2400 and 280 hard cast through that 82. So many that it went to the gunsmith when it started ratcheting the cylinder backwards upon firing. I also had a 2X Leupold, on a Buehler no/drill mount on it and shot two deer with it. One at 85 yards and the other at 160 yards. I no longer load my 44s that hot as I am getting old. Truth be told I shoot way more 38, 44 Special and 327s now days. I like this one a lot too. 29-5.
1709608048605.png
 
DD, I have 11 further up in the series, #355. Small world, excellent guns. Joe
CISl9Md.jpg
 
I used to pass any S&W by if fit had a lock, but I found a dirt cheap 4" 629-5 online that was a little rusty and grimy, and after some cleanup it's become a favorite, despite the lock. The trigger is extremely good.
Here is the auction pic.
20201228063023-6469.jpg

Funny story with this one, when it came the gun was locked up, couldn't unlatch the cylinder. I called the seller at the FFL's desk and told him the news, and he offered a refund in full if I wanted to send the gun back, or a partial refund if I would accept as is. I accepted the partial refund, told the seller I had an idea of what the problem was and if I was right it was a simple fix, and left it up to the seller to decide the amount. I slipped a flathead screwdriver under the ejector rod release, popped the cylinder open, tightened the ejector rod, and viola. A little elbow grease and this $450 629-5 looks ok again.
IMG_20221121_144220.jpg
 
Last edited:
just wondering why it’s $975 for a used gun

When people sell stuff, they either want to get rid of it or make money.

You can only sell something at a cheap price once. If you start too high, you can lower the price any number of times, in order to catch the biggest fish. It cost nothing to ask and you are leaving money behind not asking top dollar.

Why is gun powder $50/lb? Because people kept buying it at $45/lb. Had they stopped buying at $45, it would have went to $40 because everyone has to eat and pay bills. If they keep buying at $50, expect $55 shortly...
 
When people sell stuff, they either want to get rid of it or make money.

You can only sell something at a cheap price once. If you start too high, you can lower the price any number of times, in order to catch the biggest fish. It cost nothing to ask and you are leaving money behind not asking top dollar.

Why is gun powder $50/lb? Because people kept buying it at $45/lb. Had they stopped buying at $45, it would have went to $40 because everyone has to eat and pay bills. If they keep buying at $50, expect $55 shortly...
well Pistol powder us $40-$50 a pound but that’s 1500 - 2000 loads, so that don’t really count. Anyway, i’m good at certain things but negotiating gun deals… poor at it. get those ⭐️ in my eyes
 
There was a 629-6, 4" with Hogue grips at the LGS this morning when I was there. Tag read $899.00. Given the difference in local markets and such, sounds about the same, but you could talk them up I'm sure. ;)
 
There was a 629-6, 4" with Hogue grips at the LGS this morning when I was there. Tag read $899.00. Given the difference in local markets and such, sounds about the same, but you could talk them up I'm sure. ;)
U’m second in line for the 629-2!

hopefully the 1st buyer back outs or times out
 
I would pay $975 again for mine, no problem:
vP38fm.jpg

I wouldn't give you much for a new one. Not interested.
I’t still listed in their website. So the 1st person interested didn’t buy it yet. I’ll stop by today and see what sup! because I’m #2 on the list for that gun
 
The factory wood grips are for show, rubber pachmyrs for actual shooting.
 

Attachments

  • 629-1 (2).jpg
    629-1 (2).jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 4
The factory wood grips are for show, rubber pachmyrs for actual shooting.
Yep! I found that out the hard way! Got a BEAUTIFUL GP100 MC with cool guy grips that shoots like poop! but put a donated Finger Groove Pac Grip! Nail driver
 
Back
Top